GNU bug report logs - #55609
"ruby-stackprof fails fails to build (armhf-linux)"

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>

Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 08:29:01 UTC

Severity: normal

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 55609 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#55609; Package guix. (Tue, 24 May 2022 08:29:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 24 May 2022 08:29:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: ruby-stackprof sometimes fails to build (armv7h)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 10:28:30 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
To reproduce:

$ guix build ruby-stackprof <at> 0.2.17 --system=???
# if it was substituted
$ guix build ruby-stackprof <at> 0.2.17 --system=??? --no-grafts --check

where I don't know what the value of ??? is (maybe armhf-linux?).
Maybe it fails on other architectures too, but I cannot reproduce
it on i686-linux.

Apparently this can cause "guix pull" to fail, see
<https://issues.guix.gnu.org/54651>.

Greetings,
Maxime.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#55609; Package guix. (Tue, 24 May 2022 08:38:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 55609 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: 55609 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: ruby-stackprof fails fails to build (armv7h)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 10:37:13 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
title 55609 ruby-stackprof fails fails to build (armhf-linux)

Actually, it fails reproducibly:


$ guix build  ruby-stackprof <at> 0.2.17 --system=armhf-linux --check --no-grafts --check

  1) Failure:
StackProfTest#test_gc [/tmp/guix-build-ruby-stackprof-0.2.17.drv-0/gem/test/test_stackprof.rb:221]:
Expected 38 to be <= 25.


The exact ‘expected ???’ can differ though, on the next run I saw

  1) Failure:
StackProfTest#test_gc [/tmp/guix-build-ruby-stackprof-0.2.17.drv-
0/gem/test/test_stackprof.rb:221]:
Expected 47 to be <= 25.

Greetings,
Maxime.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#55609; Package guix. (Tue, 24 May 2022 08:40:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 55609 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: 55609 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: ruby-stackprof fails fails to build (armv7h)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 10:39:21 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
title 55609 ruby-stackprof fails fails to build (armhf-linux)
thanks

Actually, it fails reproducibly:


$ guix build  ruby-stackprof <at> 0.2.17 --system=armhf-linux --check --no-grafts --check

  1) Failure:
StackProfTest#test_gc [/tmp/guix-build-ruby-stackprof-0.2.17.drv-0/gem/test/test_stackprof.rb:221]:
Expected 38 to be <= 25.


The exact ‘expected ???’ can differ though, on the next run I saw

  1) Failure:
StackProfTest#test_gc [/tmp/guix-build-ruby-stackprof-0.2.17.drv-
0/gem/test/test_stackprof.rb:221]:
Expected 47 to be <= 25.

Greetings,
Maxime.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#55609; Package guix. (Tue, 24 May 2022 08:42:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 55609 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: 55609 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: ruby-stackprof fails fails to build (armv7h)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 10:41:02 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
retitle 55609 "ruby-stackprof fails fails to build (armhf-linux)"
thanks

Actually, it fails reproducibly:


$ guix build  ruby-stackprof <at> 0.2.17 --system=armhf-linux --check --no-grafts --check

  1) Failure:
StackProfTest#test_gc [/tmp/guix-build-ruby-stackprof-0.2.17.drv-0/gem/test/test_stackprof.rb:221]:
Expected 38 to be <= 25.


The exact ‘expected ???’ can differ though, on the next run I saw

  1) Failure:
StackProfTest#test_gc [/tmp/guix-build-ruby-stackprof-0.2.17.drv-
0/gem/test/test_stackprof.rb:221]:
Expected 47 to be <= 25.

Greetings,
Maxime.


[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Changed bug title to '"ruby-stackprof fails fails to build (armhf-linux)"' from 'ruby-stackprof sometimes fails to build (armv7h)' Request was from Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 24 May 2022 08:42:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#55609; Package guix. (Tue, 24 May 2022 08:46:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #19 received at 55609 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: 55609 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: ruby-stackprof sometimes fails to build (armv7h)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 10:45:40 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Reported upstream at <https://github.com/tmm1/stackprof/issues/178>
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#55609; Package guix. (Tue, 24 May 2022 21:09:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #22 received at 55609 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: 55609 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#55609: ruby-stackprof sometimes fails to build (armv7h)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 23:08:44 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Looks like a rather flaky test, depending on GC behaviour
and timing.  So I think for now the test could simply be
disabled, at least for arm?

Greetings,
Maxime.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 21 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.