GNU bug report logs - #55606
[PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add hare.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Antero Mejr <antero <at> mailbox.org>

Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 01:24:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Merged with 55187

Done: "(" <paren <at> disroot.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #81 received at 55606 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Antero Mejr <antero <at> mailbox.org>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 55606 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>,
 Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>, "\(" <paren <at> disroot.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add hare.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 10:00:28 -0400
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:

>> +                     (string-append "HAREC=" #$harec "/bin/harec")
> Should have a (this-package-input) or (this-package-native-input) for
> harec.  If it's the latter, (which "harec") might also be acceptable.

Done.

>> +                     (string-append "QBE=" #$qbe "/bin/qbe")
> As with harec.

Done.

>> +                     (string-append "SCDOC=" #$scdoc "/bin/scdoc")
> As with harec.

Done.

>> +                     "HARECACHE=.cache"
>> +                     "BINOUT=.bin")
> I suppose neither of those ought to be installed?

Right, they're temp dirs. I checked the build output and made sure they
are not included.

>> +                 (delete 'configure))))
> Why delete configure here, but not in harec?  I'm pretty sure we can
> use the same hack for both packages.

hare doesn't have a configure, so we have to set the flags for the
build manually. harec does have a configure that correctly sets many
of the build flags, so I used it.

Thanks,
Antero

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 300 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.