GNU bug report logs - #55606
[PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add hare.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Antero Mejr <antero <at> mailbox.org>

Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 01:24:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Merged with 55187

Done: "(" <paren <at> disroot.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #111 received at 55606 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: Antero Mejr <antero <at> mailbox.org>
Cc: 55606 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, me <at> tobias.gr, liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com,
 paren <at> disroot.org
Subject: Re: [bug#55606] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add hare.
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 16:53:59 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Maxime Devos schreef op zo 26-06-2022 om 16:44 [+0200]:
> Antero Mejr schreef op zo 26-06-2022 om 10:33 [-0400]:
> > I was going to use
> > "Hare programming language build driver and standard library"
> > in the next patch.
> 
> I don't have a clue what a ‘build driver’ is (a kernel-style driver +
> something about building -> a compiler inside the (Linux) kernel? 
> Doesn't seem to apply here).  I'd use ‘compiler’ instead, which I
> believe to be more widely understood (e.g., it has an entry on
> Wikipedia).
> 

Maybe nevermind.  From #guix:

14:47 < nckx> 'The build driver is responsible for collecting input files, 
              resolving their dependencies, and producing a plan for 
              compiling your program.' — 
              https://harelang.org/blog/2021-03-26-high-level-data-structures/
14:48 < nckx> Seemingly not synonymous.

although:

14:51 < maximed> (OTOH, technically 'gcc' isn't the compiler but 'cc1' is ...)

and yet we call 'gcc' a compiler and seems a bit of an implementation detail
to me, so I dunno.

Greetings,
Maxime.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 300 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.