From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 23 16:46:32 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2022 20:46:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50307 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ntEwh-0002vP-SU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2022 16:46:32 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:55100) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ntEwf-0002vH-Vn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2022 16:46:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41506) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ntEwf-0007Oj-Ou for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2022 16:46:29 -0400 Received: from jpoiret.xyz ([206.189.101.64]:50418) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ntEwc-0004pj-Jv for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2022 16:46:28 -0400 Received: from authenticated-user (jpoiret.xyz [206.189.101.64]) by jpoiret.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DD9EC184CCF; Mon, 23 May 2022 20:46:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpoiret.xyz; s=dkim; t=1653338784; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9ar4cZkS+A1Ey1yTcC5lU0eyTG7lHqY81+frEoFDUhU=; b=BluJMxCkefMwnXixFTcWGQgr+3Eswqx/rlYdDlZ6qj4hJcB+kky8jKxcRjvzWa2T/7vVTo 697riKLohrmgIh7N5K99lqICqso12Fej6vmh11gwAO/tHe+7QXPBNrQwtpQv+q8cUEOv7P 8rU45zzf4M59ZyHDyiGC1grp/lTzyov1pyGvArddIvRoZjstWKsf9kiIwuQ42xCwQgNkYy Kun7F5mA8igHJj00dRn0oihJCo73i2EvOM2gWJfIhEWPVK0cDCI5zEWKsA9SnXMJ49UFL5 5HrL/HQjHWKXq4rIHU3kKx4W+aBxw/UCcLa4Z+Xlg6EzB6UQAOz8qieMBAn1GA== From: Josselin Poiret To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] gnu: acpi-call-linux-module: Update hash because of upstream retag. Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 22:46:21 +0200 Message-Id: <20220523204621.3959-1-dev@jpoiret.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Authentication-Results: jpoiret.xyz; auth=pass smtp.auth=jpoiret@jpoiret.xyz smtp.mailfrom=dev@jpoiret.xyz X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=206.189.101.64; envelope-from=dev@jpoiret.xyz; helo=jpoiret.xyz X-Spam_score_int: 24 X-Spam_score: 2.4 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam_report: (2.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.499, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=1.997, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.997, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * gnu/packages/linux.scm (acpi-call-linux-module): Update it. The old hash was for commit 9f1c0b5d046bdfdec769809435257647fd475473, 3 commits behind commit fe9dc95a83a95e4826c1a7c809d41c2f16de40a6 whi [...] Content analysis details: (2.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom; id=dev%40jpoiret.xyz; ip=209.51.188.17; r=debbugs.gnu.org] 1.6 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)] -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Josselin Poiret X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) * gnu/packages/linux.scm (acpi-call-linux-module): Update it. The old hash was for commit 9f1c0b5d046bdfdec769809435257647fd475473, 3 commits behind commit fe9dc95a83a95e4826c1a7c809d41c2f16de40a6 which is where the tag 1.2.2 now points. --- gnu/packages/linux.scm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm index 95a9bbe39f..78aed94b95 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/linux.scm @@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ (define-public acpi-call-linux-module (commit (string-append "v" version)))) (file-name (git-file-name name version)) (sha256 - (base32 "1s7h9y3adyfhw7cjldlfmid79lrwz3vqlvziw9nwd6x5qdj4w9vp")))) + (base32 "09ljx0jl987753r2kjqj5kxms95bijw0xn14kf82ryn38ck5c8cf")))) (build-system linux-module-build-system) (arguments (list #:tests? #f ; no tests -- 2.36.0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 23 17:02:33 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2022 21:02:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50316 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ntFCC-0003OB-Ez for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2022 17:02:33 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56344) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ntFC8-0003Nz-M0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2022 17:02:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45294) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ntFC8-0002mR-EB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2022 17:02:28 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:43076) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ntFC5-0007JA-Po for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2022 17:02:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=y/5o7MfYcCGA4 um3doWjAfI1cq+ydybpV8s3bjYIr2U=; h=in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to: from:references; d=tobias.gr; b=YQWs2/I24voqHdg+ONJN6K4gWNJl7hVhFCtM1S rhkfalSWK+FCG3fdfi3bed2oGf0U1VWsZ3pec+CznYWTDBhwRKCwfpGfUg2Aatcm4dYmle 9SwV51BKI9ecoMTSwz9pMgeRuPJ43lnmboSFoWbxotP5EDJBLjqBkBVI98UMW1Plmd0VGS 0c9iGPUDh51x7qyBUCaEOG0ZkrkPEx2oO3Bgw3kikLbf9EK+XmJL2opDOs8RhCU+l+O2l/ EwuI3ii2kS5ZWeeiw6FZBDsOHjQITCtk1SCMKrSMF+sEGkKrYNPgJv2ZbkPNvLgg+agjqS fRejdb++sfxsra99tRer3yZQ== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 0db3557a (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 23 May 2022 21:02:21 +0000 (UTC) References: <20220523204621.3959-1-dev@jpoiret.xyz> From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: Josselin Poiret Subject: Re: [bug#55603] [PATCH] gnu: acpi-call-linux-module: Update hash because of upstream retag. Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 22:59:27 +0200 In-reply-to: <20220523204621.3959-1-dev@jpoiret.xyz> BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; Message-ID: <871qwk2c9v@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 55603-done@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-patches@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Josselin, I moved the general explanation to its own paragraph above the=20 (conventionally factual & short, but use your judgment) changelog=20 section, and expanded it even more (although the paranoid will=20 verify that anyway =E2=80=94 and should). Then, reader, I pushed. Thanks! T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCYov2XQ0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15FuQA/2dqKkW1VhzL34g8WAD9oylDcMdKC4kvXw9OdIAb ovxNAP95m7wSICU3t+5nwuK/7XM+pDfY7T0o88y9y15heENNAg== =GJFv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Thu Aug 14 21:57:14 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator