GNU bug report logs - #55439
[PATCH] Add support for the Modi script

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 23:35:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #118 received at 55439 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Visuwesh <visuweshm <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 55439 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Pankaj Jangid <pankaj <at> codeisgreat.org>
Subject: Re: bug#55439: [PATCH] Add support for the Modi script
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 20:01:40 +0530
[வியாழன் மே 19, 2022] Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>> From: Pankaj Jangid <pankaj <at> codeisgreat.org>
>> Cc: 55439 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 19:10:47 +0530
>> 
>> >> As I said, a language speaker might conclude it wrong even though
>> >> Emacs supports the language.
>> >
>> > I don't think I understand how could a language speaker arrive at some
>> > wrong conclusions, please elaborate.  If the problem is caused by this
>> > blurb we have at the beginning:
>> >
>> >   This is a list of ways to say hello in various languages.
>> >   It is not intended to be comprehensive, but to demonstrate
>> >   some of the character sets that Emacs supports.
>> >
>> > then we could amend that text.
>> 
>> We can just add this or something like this at the end of the above
>> paragraph - "Search for the script name of your language to see if your
>> language is supported."
>
> Sorry, I don't think I understand.  Could you explain how that text
> could mislead someone into incorrect conclusions?  Armed with that
> explanation, I think I will be able to understand your suggestion.

I will use the case of Devanagari to explain the proposal: a number of
languages uses Devanagari as the script---Hindi, Marathi, Bhojpuri,
Konkani, etc.  Pankaj says that one might not know that their language
uses the _script_ called Devanagari as people rarely speak about the
_script_ itself but more about their _language_.  At least to me, it is
far less natural to speak about the script a language uses; we mostly
speak of the language itself and refer to the script as "the way we
write X language" (note how I don't use the word "script" at all here).




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 8 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.