GNU bug report logs - #55424
[PATCH 000/602] Purge Python 2 packages

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 04:45:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #376 received at 55424 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 55424 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gnu: Add back the distinction between python-renpy
 and renpy.
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 15:35:37 +0200

Hi,

Am Freitag, dem 17.06.2022 um 09:14 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > [...]
> > +    (arguments
> > +     `(#:tests? #f ; see python2-renpy
> 
> The comment should mention 'python-renpy' instead, right?  Also, the
> arguments could use gexps...
Thanks for catching the typo.  I don't think the conversion to G-
Expressions should be in this patch, but I can follow up with a
modernization.

> And the trailing #t can be removed.
Sure.

> > [...]
> > +    (inputs
> > +     `(("renpy.in" ,(search-auxiliary-file "renpy/renpy.in"))
> > +       ("python-renpy" ,python-renpy)
> > +       ("python-tkinter" ,python "tk")
> > +       ("python" ,python) ; for ‘fix-commands’ and ‘wrap’
> > +       ("xdg-utils" ,xdg-utils)))
> 
> Can we use new style inputs here?
Not without G-Expressions, and only if I'm allowed to inline the aux-
file into the build via #$.

Cheers
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 340 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.