GNU bug report logs - #55423
[PATCH]: gnu: Add mogan.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Zhu Zihao <all_but_last <at> 163.com>

Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 03:23:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Zhu Zihao <all_but_last <at> 163.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #8 received at 55423 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: Zhu Zihao <all_but_last <at> 163.com>, 55423 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#55423] [PATCH]: gnu: Add mogan.
Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 13:57:29 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Zhu Zihao schreef op zo 15-05-2022 om 11:21 [+0800]:
> +    (home-page "https://gitee.com/XmacsLabs/mogan")))

Appears to be a mirror for <https://github.com/XmacsLabs/mogan>.

Also, what kind of fork is this?  Is the idea to (eventually) merge the
fixes and features into upstream, or are they going separate ways, or
...?  Basically, why package the fork (which comes with some technical
and social cost) instead of working with upstream?

Not saying it's forbidden to package forks, but rather for me the
default option is to only package upstream.

> + Its goal is to customize GNU TeXmacs for everyone to enjoy it
> + fluently and develop new feature for everyone to learn and create
> + science and technology.

This description sort-of suggests TeXmacs doesn't want everyone to
enjoy it and such, which I don't think is good for relations with
upstream.  Maybe like ‘(guix)Synopsis and Descriptions’ suggests, write
about some use cases and features (that were added by the fork)?

Greetings,
Maxime.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 198 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.