GNU bug report logs - #55388
28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a feature

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li>

Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 18:36:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Found in version 28.1

Fixed in version 29.2

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#55388: closed (28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a
 package nor provide a feature)
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 23:16:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2023 16:15:29 -0700
with message-id <CADwFkm=_wCNc3fX+FPKVY_jVmisMNR869LU8nCULd1z20s2ypA <at> mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#55388: 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a feature
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #55388,
regarding 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a feature
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
55388: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=55388
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a
 feature
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 20:35:31 +0200
"lisp/emacs-lisp/shorthands.el" doesn't provide a feature and lacks
a "Package" library header.  I think "Package: emacs" should be added.

Like other files in that directory "lisp/leim/quail/cham.el" neither
provides a feature nor is it explicitly made part of a package.  Would
it make sense to add ("leim" . emacs) to `finder--builtins-alist'?

Maybe another such entry should be added for the "obsolete" directory?

Unlike other "epa-*" libraries, "lisp/epa-ks.el" isn't made part of
the "epa" package and fails to provide a feature.


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li>
Cc: 55388-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#55388: 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package
 nor provide a feature
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 16:15:29 -0700
Version: 29.2

Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li> writes:

> "lisp/emacs-lisp/shorthands.el" doesn't provide a feature and lacks
> a "Package" library header.  I think "Package: emacs" should be added.

Done.

> Like other files in that directory "lisp/leim/quail/cham.el" neither
> provides a feature nor is it explicitly made part of a package.  Would
> it make sense to add ("leim" . emacs) to `finder--builtins-alist'?
>
> Maybe another such entry should be added for the "obsolete" directory?

Fixed in Bug#62751.

> Unlike other "epa-*" libraries, "lisp/epa-ks.el" isn't made part of
> the "epa" package and fails to provide a feature.

Done.

Thanks for paying attention to this aspect.  I installed the fixes on
emacs-29 (commit 71a1f0fdc9e), and am consequently closing this bug
report.


This bug report was last modified 1 year and 250 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.