From unknown Sun Jun 22 17:17:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#55388: 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a feature Resent-From: Jonas Bernoulli Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 18:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 55388 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 55388@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.165238054228626 (code B ref -1); Thu, 12 May 2022 18:36:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2022 18:35:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42262 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1npDf3-0007Re-Mj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2022 14:35:41 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:55340) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1npDf2-0007RX-D9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2022 14:35:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52618) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1npDf1-0007AG-EX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2022 14:35:39 -0400 Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]:57936) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1npDez-0008PS-D1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2022 14:35:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19872165AB for ; Thu, 12 May 2022 20:35:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bernoul.li; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :subject:subject:from:from:received:received; s=sel2011a; t= 1652380532; bh=AE0Ki6kES8TYVEt4xcW2OcwEf2e2Zke7H6kd0CRXvO0=; b=c C1ZOLZV8HkTaOJyemaUioDSUOvwSuf1iAzoXrjfBpKmvgGAZwYSaD1PY4ph6nPoh BrGFGKFoNv1qdRomUo/XSehyS2GoqeCRd5yqSEq0RMJ+XE6auUxLKIDRc8Dl16ms 8hFgf4KgVdDprXOKIeMDyBhGa0ByKjI/6vfA7jbkHc= X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail0.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id bNOF5TIyhL-K for ; Thu, 12 May 2022 20:35:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB02B1658A for ; Thu, 12 May 2022 20:35:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Jonas Bernoulli Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 20:35:31 +0200 Message-ID: <8735hetx8s.fsf@bernoul.li> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: none client-ip=212.243.197.30; envelope-from=jonas@bernoul.li; helo=mail.hostpark.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) "lisp/emacs-lisp/shorthands.el" doesn't provide a feature and lacks a "Package" library header. I think "Package: emacs" should be added. Like other files in that directory "lisp/leim/quail/cham.el" neither provides a feature nor is it explicitly made part of a package. Would it make sense to add ("leim" . emacs) to `finder--builtins-alist'? Maybe another such entry should be added for the "obsolete" directory? Unlike other "epa-*" libraries, "lisp/epa-ks.el" isn't made part of the "epa" package and fails to provide a feature. From unknown Sun Jun 22 17:17:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#55388: 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a feature Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 12:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55388 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Jonas Bernoulli Cc: 55388@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 55388-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55388.165244591328516 (code B ref 55388); Fri, 13 May 2022 12:46:01 +0000 Received: (at 55388) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2022 12:45:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43129 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1npUfR-0007PV-4K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2022 08:45:13 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:36748) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1npUfP-0007HV-8S for 55388@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2022 08:45:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=k3yqphzM4xjMYyQQsN5IjdAJ/U56GTHx8JJob+/jt4E=; b=nFQ6Z6voLiMqqRSk7d99Gq2Wvd 3l3j5qDfiBAFdb9hPYmTKp6PncEPQcnuMmKpjuVprVJll6LjEURNRFpxV8ojVgCFVvdf0qCcKTCot pu7aCYmWURT5tFwrSzd5I+eW734E7Nkh8SZpfdaW6OQvLGUPd8Z102hd1qOYF856AS6w=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1npUfG-0000f6-6Q; Fri, 13 May 2022 14:45:04 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <8735hetx8s.fsf@bernoul.li> X-Now-Playing: Band Apart's _Marseille_: "Marseille" Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 14:45:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8735hetx8s.fsf@bernoul.li> (Jonas Bernoulli's message of "Thu, 12 May 2022 20:35:31 +0200") Message-ID: <87ilq9vbxu.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Jonas Bernoulli writes: > "lisp/emacs-lisp/shorthands.el" doesn't provide a feature and lacks > a "Package" library header. I think "Package: emacs" should be added. > > Like other files in that directory "lisp/leim/quail/ch [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Jonas Bernoulli writes: > "lisp/emacs-lisp/shorthands.el" doesn't provide a feature and lacks > a "Package" library header. I think "Package: emacs" should be added. > > Like other files in that directory "lisp/leim/quail/cham.el" neither > provides a feature nor is it explicitly made part of a package. Would > it make sense to add ("leim" . emacs) to `finder--builtins-alist'? Are all .el files supposed to have either a Package: header or a `provides' these days? I wasn't aware of that... Hm... I see that Chong did something like that with all the preloaded .el files in bd78fa1d544, so I guess that's true? > Maybe another such entry should be added for the "obsolete" directory? > > Unlike other "epa-*" libraries, "lisp/epa-ks.el" isn't made part of > the "epa" package and fails to provide a feature. I think it's separate thing, but it should have a provides, so I've now added that. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Sun Jun 22 17:17:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#55388: 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a feature Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 21:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55388 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 55388@debbugs.gnu.org, Jonas Bernoulli Received: via spool by 55388-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55388.16564522771795 (code B ref 55388); Tue, 28 Jun 2022 21:38:02 +0000 Received: (at 55388) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2022 21:37:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56562 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o6Iu5-0000Sj-Dj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 17:37:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f173.google.com ([209.85.215.173]:43777) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o6Iu4-0000SX-8K for 55388@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 17:37:48 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f173.google.com with SMTP id 68so13393126pgb.10 for <55388@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 14:37:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=w/La5LlwjZTf6r72fiAQHGEglFWyiUWT23HdPeGADsg=; b=ulV6un6oOLbhR5D/w63Dl3XV/nZDi9TcgUtuEHB9jD4MG4vtqJSh7v2BEs1PGMC3f1 p+BrdayvNJiFLqTfCSkep5fCwKeQ1F+4FHMtc8ENvcsRGxwURgwft/9RcPNB3Bj+eRds /iTJDlE7rmuku6vG1SqzW46EoYwNtdPBeGRC38YPafroKqLCencyuYXC+sQaaChvWCTs Ll/LW/tEuTY8wK90cX5ka7G5PmB9hZlyBAK/h0b0T26XvMz21rcAI6SqZP+CXwRLkgRJ iRQZSlzcH85Zg4jkdXB4voG4vdb6EcUf2Q5dEeLCFG0LTi9gp8cPSmacY4MrIJ/ODTdF ilPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/mOwhC8ppw9ZR5+b7VxoUYdsTNBBE7xnlB30XeWJRfD0ZOo5X5 7F+GdQWkKKYZPajeCTIgMasdRiwCWv0KA/MKoB4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tKLrMRIHC8q7C3wsA47ryz0/sHg2O4VIWU3UMGiIaJSkaUyDHOAQjzYNvDQJa+A+3XRGJ3BTYTWZPNUAkqDJ4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:b48:b0:525:348b:438b with SMTP id p8-20020a056a000b4800b00525348b438bmr5883170pfo.2.1656452262113; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 14:37:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 14:37:41 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <87ilq9vbxu.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 13 May 2022 14:45:01 +0200") References: <8735hetx8s.fsf@bernoul.li> <87ilq9vbxu.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 14:37:41 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Jonas Bernoulli writes: > >> "lisp/emacs-lisp/shorthands.el" doesn't provide a feature and lacks >> a "Package" library header. I think "Package: emacs" should be added. The same is true for smie.el, syntax.el, tabulated-list.el, testcover.el and possibly others. Should they have such a header as well? >> Like other files in that directory "lisp/leim/quail/cham.el" neither >> provides a feature nor is it explicitly made part of a package. Would >> it make sense to add ("leim" . emacs) to `finder--builtins-alist'? > > Are all .el files supposed to have either a Package: header or a > `provides' these days? I wasn't aware of that... > > Hm... I see that Chong did something like that with all the preloaded > .el files in bd78fa1d544, so I guess that's true? It seems like it's not consistent. What do we use such a header for? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 28 17:38:00 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2022 21:38:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56566 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o6IuG-0000T9-Fp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 17:38:00 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f177.google.com ([209.85.210.177]:36547) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o6IuD-0000Sn-Ab for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 17:37:59 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f177.google.com with SMTP id x138so10491878pfc.3 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 14:37:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NWh0mKyQVCNjjuCuVTewqE19674O03fG/1jX14S+Bf8=; b=8Kij+vspa9pVD9RqG5We05d7KS+AKMV+AFxXk08tvRBxEMQgvxAHV1pw9eLs64gB63 dKMBHJiArWICFW3ioDLAaU7eRikUTvMxj2JzF1rkFewmpfz4WuNdVnPL3H5wCJpE09M7 C8c/8B3X/QL1BYqOSiRZ9jv+pWPvgsOOPHBX2oaAlZrPcpv4HVqFB43Xn6rNvmDMhPSP Pbf3UfFBgnLtjBDJuVqZZDde5u8Rk1EANxxe/6L/QwXSfdOzR7UCyhI/jMweqQMAIhX1 AoTD3dlQbeBLym20K3CPYN3Ui7q/obsmBSVfS4YFDfSjlKVAWC9eKpLIZ/dtTkpbs/uK 5+IA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9Tlj8//VShMnQ1nF9uiMcPHi04idlBpnEK4pVz1JgMrE4e7DNO O68j2CC0eG97zmql6Hy3H6GqhVA3f83BB7ql7TC9Ewzq X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1stFCYTupPAYEzpDPn3swiFrvCBtW5E2yWPy/eARIU20mID64iKR25k+DeefXm6ZaQK8COcJIfC50eNR/M+750= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:814c:0:b0:51b:b3ee:6be2 with SMTP id d12-20020aa7814c000000b0051bb3ee6be2mr6852435pfn.3.1656452271702; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 14:37:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 14:37:51 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 14:37:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: control message for bug #55388 To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) severity 55388 wishlist quit From unknown Sun Jun 22 17:17:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#55388: 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a feature Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 09:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55388 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Stefan Kangas Cc: 55388@debbugs.gnu.org, Jonas Bernoulli , Stefan Monnier Received: via spool by 55388-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55388.165649671118217 (code B ref 55388); Wed, 29 Jun 2022 09:59:01 +0000 Received: (at 55388) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2022 09:58:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57492 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o6USs-0004jl-Nt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 05:58:30 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:57832) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o6USr-0004jY-0k for 55388@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 05:58:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=jm/ORvKaQFASSPIW9q6/T+56ZPq3GYUCXZUGY0V0q9o=; b=nhm/xKBLwXzb3EId1wxU2pjmYW pFuYqFDJ4F15WpZI9N2HdAHFGU8oMX8qzbClcE6bn9S6WjJxQTz0+poj7DGYfqfrCYOvkTVyIF8OZ wOuKkMVO1OK/IBZWsKSMV4FHXTHXsYGGRbSejtZFJ5SzErVJbh1fiK+UUZGx42Q27/9I=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o6USg-00061Q-ST; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:58:21 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <8735hetx8s.fsf@bernoul.li> <87ilq9vbxu.fsf@gnus.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAALVBMVEUXExQhGxwuKi1Z LzkpJ2QjGygrK4lkU4jVnXTOLiCuSDmiJRzbTDLoa07////QtD2nAAAAAWJLR0QOb70wTwAAAAd0 SU1FB+YGHQk1EwikkDoAAAF7SURBVDjLnZQxTwIxFMdfD1i4pWdgcIMT4ooysUG8wCpGPoGE+AEw YXRwcHBzau5ucHJwYjDmxMXBoaG3QwLfxV69wqW0Ufwnl7T9vff+fbm2gAAwcrLCgDDCYGGoglXB R4AqcMpHAAlogJSDHP4hHrojlIQ6zi7AODFDoEnhxRxNKYP+HrmveOd6UP11EwduzatduK6rhpZG XGPP8zoacH2XBdYWXGVABdAG9NqFodftKHsojYaTRr437Go8JreXvfFIBXnu0W4d3zT7slQuBV7z uWG/nZGp7Dw1L7LFg28/tsIvxdxmMfUPic+eFI8iDanfiqLwUwE2iVeEkCDYZKSd236wYmtGJcDS nAO+vs6AVDkSxWsaU6YBi/t5uGRTdbtkFi/mH0vZ4NZ8NQuoH5Ft57LUy0zo/VVM0QaUkytTHtQH AzHVnPkfGc82Mh04fAIFfUbf5GEy/8d1qZtA1bC+v4VMsZKi/Lmp8xF/a4SHaAWlf1/EnYuMb6sp Z/wCmHAZAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIyLTA2LTI5VDA5OjUzOjE5KzAwOjAw8pBinAAA ACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMi0wNi0yOVQwOTo1MzoxOSswMDowMIPN2iAAAAAASUVORK5C YII= X-Now-Playing: Django Django's _Glowing In The Dark_: "The Ark" Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:58:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Tue, 28 Jun 2022 14:37:41 -0700") Message-ID: <87sfnnlrk5.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: >> Hm... I see that Chong did something like that with all the preloaded >> .el files in bd78fa1d544, so I guess that's true? > > It seems like it's not consistent. What do we use such a header for? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Stefan Kangas writes: >> Hm... I see that Chong did something like that with all the preloaded >> .el files in bd78fa1d544, so I guess that's true? > > It seems like it's not consistent. What do we use such a header for? The commit message only says: Add "Package:" file headers to denote built-in packages. So... I don't know? Perhaps Stefan M remembers; added to the CCs. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Sun Jun 22 17:17:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#55388: 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a feature Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55388 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Stefan Kangas Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Jonas Bernoulli , 55388@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 55388-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55388.16565025606465 (code B ref 55388); Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:36:02 +0000 Received: (at 55388) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2022 11:36:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57836 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o6Vyz-0001fx-Ju for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 07:36:00 -0400 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:44021) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o6Vyx-0001fj-Lc for 55388@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 07:35:44 -0400 Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 83EF28070D; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 07:35:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3358580625; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 07:35:36 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1656502536; bh=q3ETo0v7Eu5HqSgxmqVcu/uCoLRWrt80rV3AANt+pcQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=N/1IIpcWsmKfxleMbrWMOLBPtHlnASuBxoO/XG/FbxD6owXbMqpunK9kvFoajlcZI TsUP20x41yCsRAOQCBr57m9zG/E4cNnx7lD5qYjEnxWOMagP9fV7yLqq+3rQsRRIas FigMpXUi/gCefm0F5/fWVGL8jxn68Qrm2UT1A1rz86ysxbmUBXzbbrIJmg7VFzI5HT QQ9o6b/l9tP9tRDaAdZd3q5PbfMSfnnQ8Mea91QODM6/r761ZGc88e+XqM5VJIs5AN fbAktQ1Hze1SGcCkiosDF7CxQtfIElWTKYfN4/UNj2Dxac9WSCzVzkybqTtOa2U2vW cQGZPODHodWUg== Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.196.165]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7A59120329; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 07:35:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier Message-ID: References: <8735hetx8s.fsf@bernoul.li> <87ilq9vbxu.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 07:35:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Tue, 28 Jun 2022 14:37:41 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL -0.053 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >> Jonas Bernoulli writes: >>> "lisp/emacs-lisp/shorthands.el" doesn't provide a feature and lacks >>> a "Package" library header. I think "Package: emacs" should be added. > The same is true for smie.el, syntax.el, tabulated-list.el, testcover.el > and possibly others. Hmm... smie.el, syntax.el, and tabulated-list.el do `provide` themselves, AFAICT. Indeed it seems to be missing from `testcover.el`. > Should they have such a header as well? [...] > It seems like it's not consistent. What do we use such a header for? IIRC the question is whether we want to present these files as "a package" or as "a file part of some other package" in things like the finder. Stefan From unknown Sun Jun 22 17:17:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#55388: 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a feature Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55388 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Stefan Monnier Cc: 55388@debbugs.gnu.org, Jonas Bernoulli , Stefan Kangas Received: via spool by 55388-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55388.165657955218696 (code B ref 55388); Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:00:02 +0000 Received: (at 55388) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2022 08:59:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60966 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o6q12-0004rU-2B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 04:59:12 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41122) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o6q10-0004rB-C8 for 55388@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 04:59:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ADmEoUQ4Pf7UpjBhSR1jCLH08AaVKX69XfY9mqH1jlQ=; b=pbBPkNgnMxY72l7XmCdo071ty1 Hx1x1zPwchmILZKmB5aFvl5WJa3BEzL6j7Z4j3K/ug56prlfdiP/UpN2eCYaSSrRh9VnEj+sP84pD MUNWFUvPZzxIiPNvBdNpY3AQSHUQgYVf1CularCAsufdhBWPWx4pQOIk5ui67XtlD/9U=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o6q0p-0001b1-C4; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:59:01 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 29 Jun 2022 07:35:34 -0400") References: <8735hetx8s.fsf@bernoul.li> <87ilq9vbxu.fsf@gnus.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAGFBMVEU5MEFBV5OSe3mv S0jgzsGgFi/fqD3////on9Q6AAAAAWJLR0QHFmGI6wAAAAd0SU1FB+YGHggxBYtrJbYAAAGpSURB VDjLjZBRcuMwCIbJDexMD1Bh9T1jojx3VDYHWC0ncKv7H6GAZDvO5GEZjwX6gB8BoDaOo/82G6DZ ycDpAcB/gbXJExhgzT0dNR6aPIB2d+7g9Awc9Xo9Btja9hesUXff9QgjvndFSxs2vXAOoYNhBxcA HMM+915xAQxhn3tdYIDjHjXIA5wx5gMICt6YESPzZKqI7UHhDKPeMdtPq9As5vCGEZA9dOyeJzGD NXLSkFXmDjhHhTTHBlDrKG7gQoQO9DpONHfwpS6ZjgItmaREB5gceIVWZxKJoGk40UT6NY2MUxK5 wtVdooJz18hURAhsbPWp0LyOSyTXP5CvNvVESWzeT9bna6f4AdgBzdNsW+CsEgUTxHh3ELVdW8Yk 8hd7he2EpHgxk4EE6V/lip7n8vwlIoUEaq33Wpk/hBLpyT/iZqDWb+ZUVNO8A6h8T6UImbuDxeOk 05tzXzpYrLXaklI5AE0sNwc9o6YGpINKupXbEcgG6PYCqDo9gdZKtV8DkkTuUToCzSxeUZcnoJ3a vLWD0sO6nq6igLaLI+iNX4Am+EhN/RePAOvmkHezkwAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMi0w Ni0zMFQwODo0OTowNSswMDowMKh9W2cAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjItMDYtMzBUMDg6 NDk6MDUrMDA6MDDZIOPbAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: The Cure's _The Top_: "Bananafishbones" Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:58:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87bkuafrxp.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Monnier writes: > Hmm... smie.el, syntax.el, and tabulated-list.el do `provide` > themselves, AFAICT. Indeed it seems to be missing from `testcover.el`. Yup. I've now added one. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Stefan Monnier writes: > Hmm... smie.el, syntax.el, and tabulated-list.el do `provide` > themselves, AFAICT. Indeed it seems to be missing from `testcover.el`. Yup. I've now added one. >> Should they have such a header as well? > [...] >> It seems like it's not consistent. What do we use such a header for? > > IIRC the question is whether we want to present these files as "a > package" or as "a file part of some other package" in things like > the finder. So somebody should go through all the files that lack a package: and see if they feel it belongs in some package? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Sun Jun 22 17:17:06 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Jonas Bernoulli Subject: bug#55388: closed (Re: bug#55388: 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a feature) Message-ID: References: <8735hetx8s.fsf@bernoul.li> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 55388 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 55388@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 23:16:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1694992562-30741-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1694992562-30741-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #55388: 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a = feature which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 55388@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 55388: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D55388 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1694992562-30741-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 55388-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2023 23:15:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51615 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qi0zU-0007zQ-FC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 19:15:48 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]:54742) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qi0zQ-0007z9-PH for 55388-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 19:15:47 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2c008d8fd07so8687941fa.1 for <55388-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 16:15:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1694992530; x=1695597330; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KhLgg7jHzpQsFCCif1t8b9wy8YRDU37ZDOzcckQqDxQ=; b=Bw26ilQujBK0tyejz52djOOKg5Y8Y3bETcOpenz8wjN1bs6iwNOm36oB/Fbg8nE5iu S2IHB+XltuDfmlEVzFMSlkXvfeWiYShwS3yXm7g2/H/zGtDTy532GQcdBUOLRA3RIrjt KRqkKHuvg+ytUqHrRFXSqzKw9ltwSAhrAlZpuMoIHdlDaX3K2GTSZgUKiBQSX58pkL0V gFtYufzPTNgy5Xd/EntAwfWNJp0a4+LRXflDjG7HMwgY6Q0WqIomgVJw0KvitCimiexw GVOouddk0X4HcORD8a16i4IGLIsVRV9mHJmsOp5JOywbFvFuUd8BcYiKlrAfzI3W374e H6Dg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694992530; x=1695597330; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KhLgg7jHzpQsFCCif1t8b9wy8YRDU37ZDOzcckQqDxQ=; b=xQGWDnxAH9GLm5LXJf60PAKWEwbu6OTjjHg6JbD7m9tXR7bE/+Z4gA72aCpnAcZdKW FECPgQTHasCafmE8uFP2QVyLD7C2m8/4K1oykKP/fs2VZEMyeum+bZ/eI7KLv9WAnwTE c+6mVp1KX7HLQwGYFTYXFmagInx36h3+c9lpYDKxYNMVqG0WyvjknSNSWv/P5vA/DaUL 9XLu0gilcSexpE0IgcZ7Xmy7mCwR62BzjJQaLkWrioHP7Jcw6D2KDsmvopUICo5JrVLr lip/CRk02IT9ku17I/qXMa1sHutOqntskhgUYZ8M6bC4aitbb0JMesBu2XC7lUgzPAXL 1P3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyi563U3JlkgLtzNyZinjqTXWaPcRn5uF1AoamF6seNOWW8xwde UsmnKPxYnfReLPD3468kAEhy3hSDlIWGOOA9+B8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG/i10VVCrojx35MF7DZFg4O22xL4h6RRVUhZ0+uli/iYdEgr95OaNCfNmqDZQFIKSq7zqw7FqHWZSOc6vlcKw= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:700d:0:b0:2bf:6852:9339 with SMTP id l13-20020a2e700d000000b002bf68529339mr6711901ljc.3.1694992529748; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 16:15:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 16:15:29 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <8735hetx8s.fsf@bernoul.li> (Jonas Bernoulli's message of "Thu, 12 May 2022 20:35:31 +0200") References: <8735hetx8s.fsf@bernoul.li> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 16:15:29 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#55388: 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a feature To: Jonas Bernoulli Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 55388-done Cc: 55388-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Version: 29.2 Jonas Bernoulli writes: > "lisp/emacs-lisp/shorthands.el" doesn't provide a feature and lacks > a "Package" library header. I think "Package: emacs" should be added. Done. > Like other files in that directory "lisp/leim/quail/cham.el" neither > provides a feature nor is it explicitly made part of a package. Would > it make sense to add ("leim" . emacs) to `finder--builtins-alist'? > > Maybe another such entry should be added for the "obsolete" directory? Fixed in Bug#62751. > Unlike other "epa-*" libraries, "lisp/epa-ks.el" isn't made part of > the "epa" package and fails to provide a feature. Done. Thanks for paying attention to this aspect. I installed the fixes on emacs-29 (commit 71a1f0fdc9e), and am consequently closing this bug report. ------------=_1694992562-30741-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2022 18:35:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42262 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1npDf3-0007Re-Mj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2022 14:35:41 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:55340) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1npDf2-0007RX-D9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2022 14:35:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52618) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1npDf1-0007AG-EX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2022 14:35:39 -0400 Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]:57936) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1npDez-0008PS-D1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2022 14:35:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19872165AB for ; Thu, 12 May 2022 20:35:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bernoul.li; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :subject:subject:from:from:received:received; s=sel2011a; t= 1652380532; bh=AE0Ki6kES8TYVEt4xcW2OcwEf2e2Zke7H6kd0CRXvO0=; b=c C1ZOLZV8HkTaOJyemaUioDSUOvwSuf1iAzoXrjfBpKmvgGAZwYSaD1PY4ph6nPoh BrGFGKFoNv1qdRomUo/XSehyS2GoqeCRd5yqSEq0RMJ+XE6auUxLKIDRc8Dl16ms 8hFgf4KgVdDprXOKIeMDyBhGa0ByKjI/6vfA7jbkHc= X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail0.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id bNOF5TIyhL-K for ; Thu, 12 May 2022 20:35:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB02B1658A for ; Thu, 12 May 2022 20:35:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Jonas Bernoulli To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 28.1; New libraries that neither belong to a package nor provide a feature Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 20:35:31 +0200 Message-ID: <8735hetx8s.fsf@bernoul.li> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: none client-ip=212.243.197.30; envelope-from=jonas@bernoul.li; helo=mail.hostpark.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) "lisp/emacs-lisp/shorthands.el" doesn't provide a feature and lacks a "Package" library header. I think "Package: emacs" should be added. Like other files in that directory "lisp/leim/quail/cham.el" neither provides a feature nor is it explicitly made part of a package. Would it make sense to add ("leim" . emacs) to `finder--builtins-alist'? Maybe another such entry should be added for the "obsolete" directory? Unlike other "epa-*" libraries, "lisp/epa-ks.el" isn't made part of the "epa" package and fails to provide a feature. ------------=_1694992562-30741-1--