GNU bug report logs - #55370
[PATCH] Add support for the Syloti Nagri script

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh
 <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 55370 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#55370: [PATCH] Add support for the Syloti Nagri script
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 22:40:02 +0530

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Yes it was not correct, this seems more appropriate.

;; Syloti Nagri composition rules
(let ((consonant            "[\xA807-\xA80A\xA80C-\xA822]")
      (independent-vowel    "[\xA800\xA801\xA803-\xA805]")
      (vowel                "[\xA802\xA823-\xA827]")
      (nasal                "[\xA80B]")
      (virama               "[\xA806\xA82C]"))
  (set-char-table-range composition-function-table
                        '(#xA802 . #xA82C)
                        (list (vector
                               ;; Consonant conjunct based syllables
                               (concat independent-vowel "?" consonant
"\\(?:" virama consonant "\\)+"
                                       vowel "?" nasal "?")
                               1 'font-shape-gstring))))

btw this range does not cause emacs to slow down, right?
also should I send separate patches for the syloti nagri, and the fix for
previous scripts, or combine them into one?

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 10:34 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
> > Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 22:20:15 +0530
> > Cc: 55370 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> > For example, this is correct now isn't it?
>
> I don't know if it's correct, but I can say that now the regexps are
> consistent with the character-range of the rule.
>

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.