From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:24:28 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#55354 <55354@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#55354 <55354@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 29.0.50; check-declare-directory shouldn't error if there are no c-f statements Reply-To: bug#55354 <55354@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:24:28 +0000 retitle 55354 29.0.50; check-declare-directory shouldn't error if there are= no c-f statements reassign 55354 emacs submitter 55354 Jonas Bernoulli severity 55354 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 10 17:42:20 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2022 21:42:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35342 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1noXcZ-0007lB-Sr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2022 17:42:20 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:38780) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1noXcY-0007l3-Cf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2022 17:42:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37144) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1noXcW-00022a-8v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2022 17:42:18 -0400 Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]:44132) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1noXcU-0005t3-4Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2022 17:42:15 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82E1165AF for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 23:42:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bernoul.li; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :subject:subject:from:from:received:received; s=sel2011a; t= 1652218927; bh=Gl57BLXvCfHpOt+ATIYU27PD3WPGgAK9ZmihiwHjJK4=; b=Y x+QtYIYgjyOg3G4PyUGHO0DEMLBpQJLFYd2iEFcbnCznNFPtqXZpcX/kupxWYyAF m3h4YDASWWjIFsxt8cGY/ihvzgKRFKkFNTdoXhgUv6SE1TRmb4pcg0UlEd2Boldq TqY4mWBaIk1NDclMIsKJc8C5u/5yNuPWcWNXm7mfWw= X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail0.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id QDeFFxARU3b1 for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 23:42:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5132165D6 for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 23:42:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Jonas Bernoulli To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 29.0.50; check-declare-directory shouldn't error if there are no c-f statements Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 23:42:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87r151oyj4.fsf@bernoul.li> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: none client-ip=212.243.197.30; envelope-from=jonas@bernoul.li; helo=mail.hostpark.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) check-declare-directory shouldn't raise an error if there are no declare-function statements. That would allow always running c-d-d from, e.g., a Makefile, without having to remove support for running check-declare-directory when removing the last declare-function statement and then having to add it again when later adding a new statement. This could be done by using process-lines-ignore-status instead of process-lines in check-declare-directory. Cheers, Jonas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 11 08:19:09 2022 Received: (at 55354) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2022 12:19:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36365 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nolIt-0001oz-Fm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2022 08:19:09 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:40536) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nolIo-0001oe-TV for 55354@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2022 08:18:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=GEOKvTZtATDSJPtsMyWlbwqQl4JF+irs6aKI+FATQ54=; b=Qs4t4oHJ9IEy/620pMB2BuD5GJ LD6dJyfYkKQPtLEa8xEM1YTT7x8e4IBeheczwnVY+zA8Pbzm8uMEEKHmrk17uVmlRvAtNeLkrpwLY jTFdP/jfXe39s+QVU4P0d9HcHDyQZr7OMUQBr9ctA/6NotCYvjdGJ9ljfBtdPhYBir7I=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nolIf-00082y-Uk; Wed, 11 May 2022 14:18:44 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Jonas Bernoulli Subject: Re: bug#55354: 29.0.50; check-declare-directory shouldn't error if there are no c-f statements References: <87r151oyj4.fsf@bernoul.li> X-Now-Playing: Joni Mitchell's _Turbulent Indigo_: "Sex Kills" Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 14:18:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87r151oyj4.fsf@bernoul.li> (Jonas Bernoulli's message of "Tue, 10 May 2022 23:42:07 +0200") Message-ID: <875ymcb6u6.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Jonas Bernoulli writes: > This could be done by using process-lines-ignore-status instead of > process-lines in check-declare-directory. Yup. I've now done this in Emacs 29. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 55354 Cc: 55354@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Jonas Bernoulli writes: > This could be done by using process-lines-ignore-status instead of > process-lines in check-declare-directory. Yup. I've now done this in Emacs 29. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 11 08:19:09 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2022 12:19:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36369 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nolJ7-0001pl-LS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2022 08:19:09 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:40550) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nolIx-0001os-JC for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2022 08:19:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=OYNgNpQD9T52sGHYnNYJznd+hEnomwy0f8ybx0kPgcQ=; b=ohN57AuRnQh3Is0OmU1e6P2yKP PP4VuIcKcQqA3jxH0J+uTwYxqxPBQJM1pXzS6MyhSaRZjBIEwh7/Y6U/DucaJTX7xdUbRbYVz3lPD RYEpH9uha8Okb4LsD0jmL4hMAReW46CshGCLEPIosR4phrpn7OBEHNYG7mSBQa7IQwVM=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nolIq-000838-4n for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2022 14:18:53 +0200 Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 14:18:51 +0200 Message-Id: <874k1wb6tw.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #55354 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 55354 29.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 55354 29.1 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 11 10:04:30 2022 Received: (at 55354) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2022 14:04:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37949 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nomx4-0001bM-82 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2022 10:04:30 -0400 Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]:42552) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nomx2-0001bC-7q for 55354@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2022 10:04:28 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BBB16534; Wed, 11 May 2022 16:04:26 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bernoul.li; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:received :received; s=sel2011a; t=1652277866; bh=8UkdU7Lnbk5HZgBAgRG9lWyY /K4XT5eEqL6vdAgQNRY=; b=Bpal46YYcrpkNmz+fbwhQTG1qu4YCWFX06g6KgNt SXUWHWxRyzZNceVSMwxReWrUl8jXoHuovFF3MSV8J2GTJ8ncSLNGedfND0eMd3XQ SpvsqvbKqMPrrP9SKoCLajEi8LpWqFu3iD2ZRzpibERZ73uLWlBBFXHfxPXaVKYF HUk= X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id lnGQu86UQHUU; Wed, 11 May 2022 16:04:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BE9C163EF; Wed, 11 May 2022 16:04:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Jonas Bernoulli To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#55354: 29.0.50; check-declare-directory shouldn't error if there are no c-f statements In-Reply-To: <875ymcb6u6.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87r151oyj4.fsf@bernoul.li> <875ymcb6u6.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 16:04:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87v8uc5fo7.fsf@bernoul.li> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 55354 Cc: 55354@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Yup. I've now done this in Emacs 29. Thanks! And thanks *a lot* for all the bug squashing in general! From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:24:28 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator