GNU bug report logs - #55231
[PATCH v1] initrd: Allow extra search paths with ‘initrd-extra-module-paths’

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Brian Cully <bjc <at> spork.org>

Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 19:55:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo, patch

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Morgan Arnold <morgan.arnold <at> proton.me>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Eure <ian <at> retrospec.tv>, "ludo <at> gnu.org" <ludo <at> gnu.org>, "maximedevos <at> telenet.be" <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>, "john.kehayias <at> protonmail.com" <john.kehayias <at> protonmail.com>, Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>, "kaelyn.alexi <at> protonmail.com" <kaelyn.alexi <at> protonmail.com>, "guix-devel <at> gnu.org" <guix-devel <at> gnu.org>, "55231 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <55231 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: [bug#55231] [PATCH v1] initrd: Allow extra search paths with ‘initrd-extra-module-paths’
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 11:24:43 +0000
Hi Maxim,

I found the cause of these failed tests, although unfortunately it doesn't seem to resolve the problem with implicit inputs from `gnu-build-system` being non-substitutable. The failing tests pass a `derivation` as input to the derivations that they construct, rather than a `derivation-input`. My added code then fails upon attempting to apply `derivation-input-derivation` to something which is not `derivation-input?`. I think that this might arguably be a flaw in the tests, but it can be resolved by simply checking that an input is `derivation-input?` before attempting to apply `derivation-input-derivation`. I'll send over the patch in a moment.

Best,

Morgan




This bug report was last modified 12 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.