GNU bug report logs -
#55184
XFS partition could not be created on NVMe disk via parted command
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report
#55184: XFS partition could not be created on NVMe disk via parted command
which was filed against the parted package, has been closed.
The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 55184 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
--
55184: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=55184
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 09:12:25AM -0400, Hossein Ojani wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I am writing this email to you because of an error that I've been
> encountering using parted command on a NVMe disk.
>
> Using an Ubuntu 20.04 dist, I've been trying to create partitions on a NVMe
> disk though I see errors. Below I will put just one of the conditions that
> I've faced errors, but there are several.
> *(parted) mkpart extended xfs 1074MB 1574MB *
> Error: Invalid number.
That's because an extended partition is a container for logical
partitions, it doesn't have a filesystem on it, the logical partition
does.
Brian
--
Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT) - weldr.io - lorax - parted - pykickstart
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Team,
I am writing this email to you because of an error that I've been
encountering using parted command on a NVMe disk.
Using an Ubuntu 20.04 dist, I've been trying to create partitions on a NVMe
disk though I see errors. Below I will put just one of the conditions that
I've faced errors, but there are several.
(parted) print free
Model: NVMe Device (nvme)
Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 5369MB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Disk Flags:
Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
0.00B 511B 512B Free Space
1 512B 1074MB 1074MB primary lvm
1074MB 5369MB 4295MB Free Space
*(parted) mkpart extended xfs 1074MB 1574MB *
Error: Invalid number.
However, the same action could be done if the File-System is not mentioned
in the command:
*(parted) mkpart extended 1074MB 1574MB*
(parted) print
Model: NVMe Device (nvme)
Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 5369MB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Disk Flags:
Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 512B 1074MB 1074MB primary lvm
2 1074MB 1574MB 500MB extended lba
It seems the command only denies using XFS File System as it does accept
other partitions as below:
(parted) mkpart primary ext4 1575MB 1774MB
(parted) print
Model: NVMe Device (nvme)
Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 5369MB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Disk Flags:
Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 512B 1074MB 1074MB primary lvm
2 1074MB 1574MB 500MB primary lba
3 1575MB 1774MB 199MB primary ext4 lba
Would you please check the case as I observed the same question in some
relevant forums?
I am looking forward to hearing from you.
Yours sincerely,
Hossein Ojani
[Message part 5 (text/html, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 80 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.