GNU bug report logs - #55078
[PATCH]: Update webkitgtk & wpewebkit to 2.36.1.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
To: Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us>
Cc: 55078 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Zhu Zihao <all_but_last <at> 163.com>
Subject: [bug#55078] Acknowledgement ([PATCH]: Update webkitgtk & wpewebkit to 2.36.1.)
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2022 20:24:26 +0200

Am Montag, dem 06.06.2022 um 13:25 -0400 schrieb Jack Hill:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2022, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> 
> > Am Montag, dem 06.06.2022 um 23:53 +0800 schrieb Zhu Zihao:
> > > ping again and again.
> > Last time Raghav reviewed this, they said to base it off of core-
> > updates.  Since 2.36.1 has security fixes, we should aim for master
> > instead, but use grafts (we can later ungraft on core-updates or a
> > dedicated branch).
> > 
> > Can you resend this as a grafting patch for master?
> > 
> > Thanks
> 
> Is grafting really needed (I'm not confident I'm not adept enough
> with `git log` to tell for sure if we've done this before)?
Webkit is the base for a bunch of browsers.  Most of them are
lightweight compared to webkit itself, but still nasty to recompile.

> I guess technically it should go via staging as `guix refresh -l 
> webkitgtk` reports 359 dependent package to rebuild (which and
> additional 75 from webkitgtk-with-libsoup2), but many of those are
> python packages which will presumably be fast rebuilds.
Staging it is, then.  (Unless our security team says we should directly
push to master without a graft, which hasn't worked that well for us
last time.)

> Also, WebKitGTK 2.36.3 is out: 
> https://webkitgtk.org/2022/05/28/webkitgtk2.36.3-released.html
Yeah, let's do 2.36.3 then.

Cheers

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.