GNU bug report logs - #54914
28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 15:31:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 28.1.50

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 54914 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 54914 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#54914; Package emacs. (Wed, 13 Apr 2022 15:31:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Wed, 13 Apr 2022 15:31:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 16:25:41 +0530
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Brahmi just like any other Indic script also has the ability to form
conjuncts, but despite using "Segoe UI Historic" font which supports Brahmi
Conjuncts, Emacs is not able to display them.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Add "(set-fontset-font t 'brahmi (font-spec :family "Segoe UI
Historic"))" to init.el

2. In the scratch buffer type any combination of brahmi
consonant+virama+consonant. e.g. 𑀓𑁆𑀯 𑀜𑁆𑀚 𑀝𑁆𑀞 𑀭𑁆𑀓𑁆𑀭𑁆𑀢 𑀳𑁆𑀮
𑀗𑁆𑀓𑁆𑀢

3. Instead of forming a conjunct they appear separately.
It is as if devanagari स्म is displayed as स्‌म

I have attached the correct render from "hb-view" in the file
"hb-brahmi.png" and the incorrect render from emacs in the file
"emacs-brahmi.png"
Note: "Noto Sans Brahmi" has negligible amount of brahmi conjuncts so it
will be preferable to use "Segoe UI Historic"

In GNU Emacs 28.1.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.33,
cairo version 1.17.6)
 of 2022-04-12 built on a0567577fe19
Repository revision: 322091604b73bf6ef8ca2458a97df41de600dc42
Repository branch: pgtk-nativecomp
Windowing system distributor 'System Description: Arch Linux

Configured using:
 'configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --libexecdir=/usr/lib
 --localstatedir=/var --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-gameuser=:games
 --with-sound=alsa --with-modules --with-x-toolkit=gtk3 --with-cairo
 --with-xwidgets --with-native-compilation --with-pgtk
 --without-compress-install --without-gconf --without-gsettings
 --without-m17n-flt --enable-autodepend --enable-link-time-optimization
 'CFLAGS=-march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fno-plt -fexceptions
 -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat -Werror=format-security
 -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -g -flto'
 LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1,--sort-common,--as-needed,-z,relro,-z,now'

Configured features:
ACL CAIRO DBUS FREETYPE GIF GLIB GMP GNUTLS GPM HARFBUZZ JPEG JSON LCMS2
LIBOTF LIBSYSTEMD LIBXML2 MODULES NATIVE_COMP NOTIFY INOTIFY PDUMPER
PGTK PNG RSVG SECCOMP SOUND THREADS TIFF TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS XIM
XWIDGETS GTK3 ZLIB

Important settings:
  value of $LANG: hi_IN.UTF-8
  value of $XMODIFIERS: @im=ibus
  locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix

Major mode: Lisp Interaction

Minor modes in effect:
  text-scale-mode: t
  tooltip-mode: t
  global-eldoc-mode: t
  eldoc-mode: t
  show-paren-mode: t
  electric-indent-mode: t
  mouse-wheel-mode: t
  tool-bar-mode: t
  menu-bar-mode: t
  file-name-shadow-mode: t
  global-font-lock-mode: t
  font-lock-mode: t
  blink-cursor-mode: t
  auto-composition-mode: t
  auto-encryption-mode: t
  auto-compression-mode: t
  line-number-mode: t
  indent-tabs-mode: t
  transient-mark-mode: t

Load-path shadows:
None found.

Features:
(shadow sort mail-extr emacsbug message rmc puny dired dired-loaddefs
rfc822 mml mml-sec epa derived epg rfc6068 epg-config gnus-util rmail
rmail-loaddefs auth-source cl-seq eieio eieio-core cl-macs
eieio-loaddefs password-cache json map text-property-search seq byte-opt
gv bytecomp byte-compile cconv mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse
rfc2231 mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader sendmail rfc2047 rfc2045
ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mail-utils time-date subr-x cl-loaddefs
cl-lib face-remap iso-transl tooltip eldoc paren electric uniquify
ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type elisp-mode mwheel term/pgtk-win
pgtk-win term/common-win tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe
tabulated-list replace newcomment text-mode lisp-mode prog-mode register
page tab-bar menu-bar rfn-eshadow isearch easymenu timer select
scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax font-core term/tty-colors
frame minibuffer cl-generic cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang
vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese eucjp-ms cp51932
hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic
chinese composite emoji-zwj charscript charprop case-table epa-hook
jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev obarray cl-preloaded nadvice button
loaddefs faces cus-face macroexp files window text-properties overlay
sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget
hashtable-print-readable backquote threads xwidget-internal dbusbind
inotify dynamic-setting font-render-setting cairo move-toolbar gtk
x-toolkit pgtk lcms2 multi-tty make-network-process native-compile
emacs)

Memory information:
((conses 16 71882 7789)
 (symbols 48 6679 0)
 (strings 32 19692 1760)
 (string-bytes 1 653683)
 (vectors 16 14235)
 (vector-slots 8 304684 17309)
 (floats 8 28 45)
 (intervals 56 397 0)
 (buffers 992 12))
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[hb-brahmi.png (image/png, attachment)]
[emacs-brahmi.png (image/png, attachment)]

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#54914; Package emacs. (Wed, 13 Apr 2022 16:04:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 19:03:36 +0300
> From: Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 16:25:41 +0530
> 
> Brahmi just like any other Indic script also has the ability to form conjuncts, but despite using "Segoe UI
> Historic" font which supports Brahmi Conjuncts, Emacs is not able to display them.

This is a missing feature: we don't have composition rules for the
Brahmi script, and more generally don't have any support for that
script.  Patches to add that are welcome.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#54914; Package emacs. (Wed, 13 Apr 2022 16:57:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
To: Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 18:56:21 +0200
>>>>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 19:03:36 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:

    >> From: Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
    >> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 16:25:41 +0530
    >> 
    >> Brahmi just like any other Indic script also has the ability to form conjuncts, but despite using "Segoe UI
    >> Historic" font which supports Brahmi Conjuncts, Emacs is not able to display them.

    Eli> This is a missing feature: we don't have composition rules for the
    Eli> Brahmi script, and more generally don't have any support for that
    Eli> script.  Patches to add that are welcome.

A brute-force example of what Eli's talking about would be:

(set-char-table-range composition-function-table
		      '(#x11000 . #x1107F)
		      (list (vector "[\x11000-\x1107F]+" 0 #'font-shape-gstring)))

which essentially means "hand off any sequence of Brahmi codepoints to
harfbuzz", which might end up being slow. From your example, youʼre
requesting more something like "consonant, virami, consonant", which
is also possible, but we'll need your guidance to tell us when the
results are acceptable. (If anyone is interested, thereʼs section 14.1
of the Unicode 14 standard that describes how they think Brahmi should
be handled, but Iʼve not tried to understand it yet).

Robert
-- 




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#54914; Package emacs. (Wed, 13 Apr 2022 18:10:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh
 <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
To: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 23:36:02 +0530
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
I am not capable enough to write my own patch for it, but will be more than
happy to provide help in implementing it, by validating results.

On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:26 PM Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> >>>>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 19:03:36 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> said:
>
>     >> From: Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
>     >> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 16:25:41 +0530
>     >>
>     >> Brahmi just like any other Indic script also has the ability to
> form conjuncts, but despite using "Segoe UI
>     >> Historic" font which supports Brahmi Conjuncts, Emacs is not able
> to display them.
>
>     Eli> This is a missing feature: we don't have composition rules for the
>     Eli> Brahmi script, and more generally don't have any support for that
>     Eli> script.  Patches to add that are welcome.
>
> A brute-force example of what Eli's talking about would be:
>
> (set-char-table-range composition-function-table
>                       '(#x11000 . #x1107F)
>                       (list (vector "[\x11000-\x1107F]+" 0
> #'font-shape-gstring)))
>
> which essentially means "hand off any sequence of Brahmi codepoints to
> harfbuzz", which might end up being slow. From your example, youʼre
> requesting more something like "consonant, virami, consonant", which
> is also possible, but we'll need your guidance to tell us when the
> results are acceptable. (If anyone is interested, thereʼs section 14.1
> of the Unicode 14 standard that describes how they think Brahmi should
> be handled, but Iʼve not tried to understand it yet).
>
> Robert
> --
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#54914; Package emacs. (Wed, 13 Apr 2022 18:27:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 21:26:55 +0300
> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 18:56:21 +0200
> 
> A brute-force example of what Eli's talking about would be:
> 
> (set-char-table-range composition-function-table
> 		      '(#x11000 . #x1107F)
> 		      (list (vector "[\x11000-\x1107F]+" 0 #'font-shape-gstring)))

Does that really work?  I'm not sure it will catch the "consonant,
virama, consonant" rule (because the virama is a nonspacing mark, and
we have a default rule for those in composite.el).




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#54914; Package emacs. (Thu, 14 Apr 2022 09:08:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #20 received at 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 11:07:23 +0200
>>>>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 21:26:55 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:

    >> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
    >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
    >> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 18:56:21 +0200
    >> 
    >> A brute-force example of what Eli's talking about would be:
    >> 
    >> (set-char-table-range composition-function-table
    >> '(#x11000 . #x1107F)
    >> (list (vector "[\x11000-\x1107F]+" 0 #'font-shape-gstring)))

    Eli> Does that really work?  I'm not sure it will catch the "consonant,
    Eli> virama, consonant" rule (because the virama is a nonspacing mark, and
    Eli> we have a default rule for those in composite.el).

We do indeed. The following handles only Ka through Lla in combination
with Virama, and seems to do the right thing here with Segoe UI
Historic (which I donʼt think we can set as default for the Brahmi
script, since itʼs non-free).

;; <Consonant, Virama, Consonant>, or <Consonant, Virama>, where the
;; latter indicates a vowelless consonant.
(set-char-table-range composition-function-table
		      '(#x11013 . #x11034)
		      (list (vector "[\x11013-\x11034]\x11046[\x11013-\x11034]?"
                                    0 #'font-shape-gstring)))

Robert
-- 




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#54914; Package emacs. (Sat, 16 Apr 2022 10:22:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #23 received at 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 13:22:07 +0300
> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 11:07:23 +0200
> 
> >>>>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 21:26:55 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:
> 
>     >> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
>     >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>     >> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 18:56:21 +0200
>     >> 
>     >> A brute-force example of what Eli's talking about would be:
>     >> 
>     >> (set-char-table-range composition-function-table
>     >> '(#x11000 . #x1107F)
>     >> (list (vector "[\x11000-\x1107F]+" 0 #'font-shape-gstring)))
> 
>     Eli> Does that really work?  I'm not sure it will catch the "consonant,
>     Eli> virama, consonant" rule (because the virama is a nonspacing mark, and
>     Eli> we have a default rule for those in composite.el).
> 
> We do indeed. The following handles only Ka through Lla in combination
> with Virama, and seems to do the right thing here with Segoe UI
> Historic (which I donʼt think we can set as default for the Brahmi
> script, since itʼs non-free).
> 
> ;; <Consonant, Virama, Consonant>, or <Consonant, Virama>, where the
> ;; latter indicates a vowelless consonant.
> (set-char-table-range composition-function-table
> 		      '(#x11013 . #x11034)
> 		      (list (vector "[\x11013-\x11034]\x11046[\x11013-\x11034]?"
>                                     0 #'font-shape-gstring)))

I've now added support for the Brahmi script to the master branch;
please test and report any problems you find.

(We cannot advertise Segoe UI Historic, unfortunately, since it is not
a free font, AFAICT.)




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#54914; Package emacs. (Sat, 16 Apr 2022 12:27:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #26 received at 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh
 <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rpluim <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 15:26:23 +0300
> From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 17:43:49 +0530
> Cc: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>, 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> I can notice two problems
> 1. Vowel signs are not attached properly to conjuncts.
>     Correct output=hb-conjuncts-maatra.png   Incorrect Output=emacs-conjuncts-maatra.png
> 
> 2. Conjuncts with more than two consonants are not supported.
>     Correct output=hb-tri-conjuncts.png   Incorrect Output=emacs-tri-conjuncts.png

Thanks, but please always show the codepoints themselves that are or
should be involved, because it's impossible to glean that from the
images.

Also, where do you see the shaping rules that support those
combinations?  I didn't find them in the Unicode Standard or anywhere
else I've read about Brahmi.  What are your sources?  That hb-view
does something doesn't yet mean it's correct, since HarfBuzz is just
another piece of software, and can have bugs.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#54914; Package emacs. (Sat, 16 Apr 2022 15:15:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #29 received at 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh
 <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 17:43:49 +0530
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Thank you very much for adding support for Brahmi!

I can notice two problems
1. Vowel signs are not attached properly to conjuncts.
    Correct output=hb-conjuncts-maatra.png   Incorrect
Output=emacs-conjuncts-maatra.png

2. Conjuncts with more than two consonants are not supported.
    Correct output=hb-tri-conjuncts.png   Incorrect
Output=emacs-tri-conjuncts.png

On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 3:51 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
> > Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com
> > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 11:07:23 +0200
> >
> > >>>>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 21:26:55 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> said:
> >
> >     >> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
> >     >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >     >> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 18:56:21 +0200
> >     >>
> >     >> A brute-force example of what Eli's talking about would be:
> >     >>
> >     >> (set-char-table-range composition-function-table
> >     >> '(#x11000 . #x1107F)
> >     >> (list (vector "[\x11000-\x1107F]+" 0 #'font-shape-gstring)))
> >
> >     Eli> Does that really work?  I'm not sure it will catch the
> "consonant,
> >     Eli> virama, consonant" rule (because the virama is a nonspacing
> mark, and
> >     Eli> we have a default rule for those in composite.el).
> >
> > We do indeed. The following handles only Ka through Lla in combination
> > with Virama, and seems to do the right thing here with Segoe UI
> > Historic (which I donʼt think we can set as default for the Brahmi
> > script, since itʼs non-free).
> >
> > ;; <Consonant, Virama, Consonant>, or <Consonant, Virama>, where the
> > ;; latter indicates a vowelless consonant.
> > (set-char-table-range composition-function-table
> >                     '(#x11013 . #x11034)
> >                     (list (vector
> "[\x11013-\x11034]\x11046[\x11013-\x11034]?"
> >                                     0 #'font-shape-gstring)))
>
> I've now added support for the Brahmi script to the master branch;
> please test and report any problems you find.
>
> (We cannot advertise Segoe UI Historic, unfortunately, since it is not
> a free font, AFAICT.)
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[emacs-conjuncts-maatra.png (image/png, attachment)]
[hb-conjuncts-maatra.png (image/png, attachment)]
[emacs-tri-conjuncts.png (image/png, attachment)]
[hb-tri-conjuncts.png (image/png, attachment)]

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#54914; Package emacs. (Sat, 16 Apr 2022 15:15:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #32 received at 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh
 <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 19:04:15 +0530
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
>
> Thanks, but please always show the codepoints themselves that are or
> should be involved, because it's impossible to glean that from the
> images.
>

Sorry for not including the codepoints, here they are:
hb-conjuncts-maatra.png & emacs-conjuncts-maatra.png from top to bottom
1. \011013 \011046 \01102C \011038(𑀓𑁆𑀬𑀸)
2. \011013 \011046 \01102E \011043 (𑀓𑁆𑀮𑁃)
3. \011032 \011046 \01102C \01103B(𑀲𑁆𑀬𑀻)

hb-tri-conjuncts.png & emacs-tri-conjuncts.png from top to bottom
1. \011013 \011046 \01102E \011046 \01102F (𑀓𑁆𑀮𑁆𑀯)
2. \01102F \011046 \01102C \011046 \01102F (𑀯𑁆𑀬𑁆𑀯)
3. \01102B \011046 \011027 \011046 \01102D (𑀫𑁆𑀧𑁆𑀭)

Also, where do you see the shaping rules that support those
> combinations?  I didn't find them in the Unicode Standard or anywhere
> else I've read about Brahmi.  What are your sources?
>

Languages like Sanskrit has three or more than three conjuncts. They are
supported in scripts like devanagari (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devanagari_conjuncts#Tri-_and_tetra-consonantal_conjuncts
)
So brahmi should be able to support them too.
I could find one example in the "Proposal to include Brahmi in Unicode"
document (https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2003/03249r-brahmi-proposal.pdf)
(Page 5, 1st image, 3rd character)

On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 5:56 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
> > Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 17:43:49 +0530
> > Cc: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>, 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> > I can notice two problems
> > 1. Vowel signs are not attached properly to conjuncts.
> >     Correct output=hb-conjuncts-maatra.png   Incorrect
> Output=emacs-conjuncts-maatra.png
> >
> > 2. Conjuncts with more than two consonants are not supported.
> >     Correct output=hb-tri-conjuncts.png   Incorrect
> Output=emacs-tri-conjuncts.png
>
> Thanks, but please always show the codepoints themselves that are or
> should be involved, because it's impossible to glean that from the
> images.
>
> Also, where do you see the shaping rules that support those
> combinations?  I didn't find them in the Unicode Standard or anywhere
> else I've read about Brahmi.  What are your sources?  That hb-view
> does something doesn't yet mean it's correct, since HarfBuzz is just
> another piece of software, and can have bugs.
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[brahmi-tri-conjunct.png (image/png, attachment)]

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#54914; Package emacs. (Sat, 16 Apr 2022 16:30:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #35 received at 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh
 <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rpluim <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 19:29:36 +0300
> From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 19:04:15 +0530
> Cc: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>, 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> Sorry for not including the codepoints, here they are:
> hb-conjuncts-maatra.png & emacs-conjuncts-maatra.png from top to bottom
> 1. \011013 \011046 \01102C \011038(𑀓𑁆𑀬𑀸)
> 2. \011013 \011046 \01102E \011043 (𑀓𑁆𑀮𑁃)
> 3. \011032 \011046 \01102C \01103B(𑀲𑁆𑀬𑀻)
> 
> hb-tri-conjuncts.png & emacs-tri-conjuncts.png from top to bottom
> 1. \011013 \011046 \01102E \011046 \01102F (𑀓𑁆𑀮𑁆𑀯)
> 2. \01102F \011046 \01102C \011046 \01102F (𑀯𑁆𑀬𑁆𑀯)
> 3. \01102B \011046 \011027 \011046 \01102D (𑀫𑁆𑀧𑁆𑀭)
> 
>  Also, where do you see the shaping rules that support those
>  combinations?  I didn't find them in the Unicode Standard or anywhere
>  else I've read about Brahmi.  What are your sources? 
> 
>  
> Languages like Sanskrit has three or more than three conjuncts. They are supported in scripts like
> devanagari (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devanagari_conjuncts#Tri-_and_tetra-consonantal_conjuncts)
> So brahmi should be able to support them too.
> I could find one example in the "Proposal to include Brahmi in Unicode" document
> (https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2003/03249r-brahmi-proposal.pdf) (Page 5, 1st image, 3rd character)

I've attempted to enhance the composition rules, please try the latest
master.  They don't always work on my system, but I think that's
because of the font I use and perhaps also the relatively old version
of HarfBuzz I have here.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#54914; Package emacs. (Sun, 17 Apr 2022 12:51:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #38 received at 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh
 <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 18:19:47 +0530
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Vowel signs U+1103E U+1103F U+11040 and U+11041 are not connected properly
to conjuncts.

Here are the codepoints of the text I entered:
11013 11046 11032 1103E (𑀓𑁆𑀲𑀾)
11013 11046 11032 1103F (𑀓𑁆𑀲𑀿)
11013 11046 11032 11040 (𑀓𑁆𑀲𑁀)
11013 11046 11032 11041 (𑀓𑁆𑀲𑁁)

On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 9:59 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
> > Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 19:04:15 +0530
> > Cc: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>, 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> > Sorry for not including the codepoints, here they are:
> > hb-conjuncts-maatra.png & emacs-conjuncts-maatra.png from top to bottom
> > 1. \011013 \011046 \01102C \011038(𑀓𑁆𑀬𑀸)
> > 2. \011013 \011046 \01102E \011043 (𑀓𑁆𑀮𑁃)
> > 3. \011032 \011046 \01102C \01103B(𑀲𑁆𑀬𑀻)
> >
> > hb-tri-conjuncts.png & emacs-tri-conjuncts.png from top to bottom
> > 1. \011013 \011046 \01102E \011046 \01102F (𑀓𑁆𑀮𑁆𑀯)
> > 2. \01102F \011046 \01102C \011046 \01102F (𑀯𑁆𑀬𑁆𑀯)
> > 3. \01102B \011046 \011027 \011046 \01102D (𑀫𑁆𑀧𑁆𑀭)
> >
> >  Also, where do you see the shaping rules that support those
> >  combinations?  I didn't find them in the Unicode Standard or anywhere
> >  else I've read about Brahmi.  What are your sources?
> >
> >
> > Languages like Sanskrit has three or more than three conjuncts. They are
> supported in scripts like
> > devanagari (
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devanagari_conjuncts#Tri-_and_tetra-consonantal_conjuncts
> )
> > So brahmi should be able to support them too.
> > I could find one example in the "Proposal to include Brahmi in Unicode"
> document
> > (https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2003/03249r-brahmi-proposal.pdf) (Page 5,
> 1st image, 3rd character)
>
> I've attempted to enhance the composition rules, please try the latest
> master.  They don't always work on my system, but I think that's
> because of the font I use and perhaps also the relatively old version
> of HarfBuzz I have here.
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[emacs-rl.png (image/png, attachment)]
[hb-rl.png (image/png, attachment)]

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#54914; Package emacs. (Sun, 17 Apr 2022 14:02:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #41 received at 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
To: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh
 <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 16:01:01 +0200
>>>>> On Sun, 17 Apr 2022 18:19:47 +0530, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com> said:

    समीर> Vowel signs U+1103E U+1103F U+11040 and U+11041 are not connected properly
    समीर> to conjuncts.

    समीर> Here are the codepoints of the text I entered:
    समीर> 11013 11046 11032 1103E (𑀓𑁆𑀲𑀾)
    समीर> 11013 11046 11032 1103F (𑀓𑁆𑀲𑀿)
    समीर> 11013 11046 11032 11040 (𑀓𑁆𑀲𑁀)
    समीर> 11013 11046 11032 11041 (𑀓𑁆𑀲𑁁)

How about this?

diff --git a/lisp/language/indian.el b/lisp/language/indian.el
index 0a50dd999f..ef095ddc3b 100644
--- a/lisp/language/indian.el
+++ b/lisp/language/indian.el
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ malayalam-composable-pattern
 ;; Brahmi composition rules
 (let ((consonant     "[\U00011013-\U00011034]")
       (non-consonant "[^\U00011013-\U00011034\U00011046\U0001107F]")
-      (vowel         "[\U00011038-\U0001103D\U00011042-\U00011045]")
+      (vowel         "[\U00011038-\U00011045]")
       (numeral       "[\U00011052-\U00011065]")
       (multiplier    "[\U00011064\U00011065]")
       (virama        "\U00011046")

Robert
-- 




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#54914; Package emacs. (Sun, 17 Apr 2022 14:26:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #44 received at 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh
 <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
To: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 19:55:36 +0530
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Everything seems to be working fine now.
Thank you Eli and Robert for your hardwork.

Here is "Welcome to Emacs" in Sanskrit in the Brahmi script rendered
correctly in Emacs!
𑀈𑀫𑁃𑀓𑁆𑀲𑁂 𑀲𑁆𑀯𑀸𑀕𑀢𑀫𑁆 (ईमैक्से स्वागतम् īmaiksē svāgatam)

On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 7:31 PM Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> >>>>> On Sun, 17 Apr 2022 18:19:47 +0530, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <
> lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com> said:
>
>     समीर> Vowel signs U+1103E U+1103F U+11040 and U+11041 are not
> connected properly
>     समीर> to conjuncts.
>
>     समीर> Here are the codepoints of the text I entered:
>     समीर> 11013 11046 11032 1103E (𑀓𑁆𑀲𑀾)
>     समीर> 11013 11046 11032 1103F (𑀓𑁆𑀲𑀿)
>     समीर> 11013 11046 11032 11040 (𑀓𑁆𑀲𑁀)
>     समीर> 11013 11046 11032 11041 (𑀓𑁆𑀲𑁁)
>
> How about this?
>
> diff --git a/lisp/language/indian.el b/lisp/language/indian.el
> index 0a50dd999f..ef095ddc3b 100644
> --- a/lisp/language/indian.el
> +++ b/lisp/language/indian.el
> @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ malayalam-composable-pattern
>  ;; Brahmi composition rules
>  (let ((consonant     "[\U00011013-\U00011034]")
>        (non-consonant "[^\U00011013-\U00011034\U00011046\U0001107F]")
> -      (vowel         "[\U00011038-\U0001103D\U00011042-\U00011045]")
> +      (vowel         "[\U00011038-\U00011045]")
>        (numeral       "[\U00011052-\U00011065]")
>        (multiplier    "[\U00011064\U00011065]")
>        (virama        "\U00011046")
>
> Robert
> --
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[emacs.png (image/png, attachment)]

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#54914; Package emacs. (Sun, 17 Apr 2022 14:50:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #47 received at 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 17:49:18 +0300
> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 16:01:01 +0200
> 
> >>>>> On Sun, 17 Apr 2022 18:19:47 +0530, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com> said:
> 
>     समीर> Vowel signs U+1103E U+1103F U+11040 and U+11041 are not connected properly
>     समीर> to conjuncts.
> 
>     समीर> Here are the codepoints of the text I entered:
>     समीर> 11013 11046 11032 1103E (𑀓𑁆𑀲𑀾)
>     समीर> 11013 11046 11032 1103F (𑀓𑁆𑀲𑀿)
>     समीर> 11013 11046 11032 11040 (𑀓𑁆𑀲𑁀)
>     समीर> 11013 11046 11032 11041 (𑀓𑁆𑀲𑁁)
> 
> How about this?

Thanks, installed.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#54914; Package emacs. (Sun, 17 Apr 2022 14:58:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #50 received at 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh
 <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rpluim <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 17:57:24 +0300
> From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 19:55:36 +0530
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> Everything seems to be working fine now.
> Thank you Eli and Robert for your hardwork.

Thanks for testing.

> Here is "Welcome to Emacs" in Sanskrit in the Brahmi script rendered correctly in Emacs!
> 𑀈𑀫𑁃𑀓𑁆𑀲𑁂 𑀲𑁆𑀯𑀸𑀕𑀢𑀫𑁆 (ईमैक्से स्वागतम् īmaiksē svāgatam)

Thanks, but we are not done yet.

First, we need to have a "hello" greeting in Brahmi script for the
etc/HELLO file.  Can you show such a greeting?  It is okay to have two
or even 3 if there's no single phrase for that.

We also need to know how to write "Brahmi" in Brahmi script, but I
think I found the answer for that: "𑀩𑁆𑀭𑀸𑀳𑁆𑀫𑀻", right?  If that is
incorrect, please tell how to write this correctly.

Last, but not least, we should have an input method for Brahmi.  I
looked around, but found only one description of a keyboard map for
Brahmi, which is here:

  https://github.com/kaamanita/brahmi

Can you look and tell whether the keyboard layout shown there is
reasonable?  If not, can you point me to a better one, or maybe
suggest such a layout yourself?  All I need to know is which key on a
standard QWERTY keyboard should produce what Brahmi character(s), and
then I can write the input method myself.

Thanks.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#54914; Package emacs. (Sun, 17 Apr 2022 15:52:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #53 received at 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh
 <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 21:20:50 +0530
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
>
> First, we need to have a "hello" greeting in Brahmi script for the
> etc/HELLO file.  Can you show such a greeting?
>
𑀦𑀫𑀲𑁆𑀢𑁂 (नमस्ते namastē) (11026 1102B 11032 11046 11022 11042) could
work in Sanskrit

We also need to know how to write "Brahmi" in Brahmi script, but I
> think I found the answer for that: "𑀩𑁆𑀭𑀸𑀳𑁆𑀫𑀻", right?  If that is
> incorrect, please tell how to write this correctly.
>

Yes this is correct

Can you look and tell whether the keyboard layout shown there is
> reasonable?  If not, can you point me to a better one, or maybe
> suggest such a layout yourself?  All I need to know is which key on a
> standard QWERTY keyboard should produce what Brahmi character(s), and
> then I can write the input method myself.
>

Here is a modified version of the layout which I use

On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 8:27 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 19:55:36 +0530
> > Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> > Everything seems to be working fine now.
> > Thank you Eli and Robert for your hardwork.
>
> Thanks for testing.
>
> > Here is "Welcome to Emacs" in Sanskrit in the Brahmi script rendered
> correctly in Emacs!
> > 𑀈𑀫𑁃𑀓𑁆𑀲𑁂 𑀲𑁆𑀯𑀸𑀕𑀢𑀫𑁆 (ईमैक्से स्वागतम् īmaiksē svāgatam)
>
> Thanks, but we are not done yet.
>
> First, we need to have a "hello" greeting in Brahmi script for the
> etc/HELLO file.  Can you show such a greeting?  It is okay to have two
> or even 3 if there's no single phrase for that.
>
> We also need to know how to write "Brahmi" in Brahmi script, but I
> think I found the answer for that: "𑀩𑁆𑀭𑀸𑀳𑁆𑀫𑀻", right?  If that is
> incorrect, please tell how to write this correctly.
>
> Last, but not least, we should have an input method for Brahmi.  I
> looked around, but found only one description of a keyboard map for
> Brahmi, which is here:
>
>   https://github.com/kaamanita/brahmi
>
> Can you look and tell whether the keyboard layout shown there is
> reasonable?  If not, can you point me to a better one, or maybe
> suggest such a layout yourself?  All I need to know is which key on a
> standard QWERTY keyboard should produce what Brahmi character(s), and
> then I can write the input method myself.
>
> Thanks.
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[brahmi2-kb (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#54914; Package emacs. (Sun, 17 Apr 2022 17:40:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #56 received at 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh
 <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rpluim <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 20:38:57 +0300
> From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 21:20:50 +0530
> Cc: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>, 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
>  First, we need to have a "hello" greeting in Brahmi script for the
>  etc/HELLO file.  Can you show such a greeting?
> 
> 𑀦𑀫𑀲𑁆𑀢𑁂 (नमस्ते namastē) (11026 1102B 11032 11046 11022 11042) could work in Sanskrit
> 
>  We also need to know how to write "Brahmi" in Brahmi script, but I
>  think I found the answer for that: "𑀩𑁆𑀭𑀸𑀳𑁆𑀫𑀻", right?  If that is
>  incorrect, please tell how to write this correctly.
> 
> Yes this is correct 
> 
>  Can you look and tell whether the keyboard layout shown there is
>  reasonable?  If not, can you point me to a better one, or maybe
>  suggest such a layout yourself?  All I need to know is which key on a
>  standard QWERTY keyboard should produce what Brahmi character(s), and
>  then I can write the input method myself.
> 
> Here is a modified version of the layout which I use 

Thanks, I added the missing pieces, please see if I missed anything or
made any mistakes.  If not, I think we can close this bug.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#54914; Package emacs. (Sun, 17 Apr 2022 17:53:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #59 received at 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh
 <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 23:21:59 +0530
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Looks good to me 👍

Again, thank you for your hard work.


On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 11:09 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 21:20:50 +0530
> > Cc: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>, 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> >  First, we need to have a "hello" greeting in Brahmi script for the
> >  etc/HELLO file.  Can you show such a greeting?
> >
> > 𑀦𑀫𑀲𑁆𑀢𑁂 (नमस्ते namastē) (11026 1102B 11032 11046 11022 11042)
> could work in Sanskrit
> >
> >  We also need to know how to write "Brahmi" in Brahmi script, but I
> >  think I found the answer for that: "𑀩𑁆𑀭𑀸𑀳𑁆𑀫𑀻", right?  If that
> is
> >  incorrect, please tell how to write this correctly.
> >
> > Yes this is correct
> >
> >  Can you look and tell whether the keyboard layout shown there is
> >  reasonable?  If not, can you point me to a better one, or maybe
> >  suggest such a layout yourself?  All I need to know is which key on a
> >  standard QWERTY keyboard should produce what Brahmi character(s), and
> >  then I can write the input method myself.
> >
> > Here is a modified version of the layout which I use
>
> Thanks, I added the missing pieces, please see if I missed anything or
> made any mistakes.  If not, I think we can close this bug.
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Reply sent to Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sun, 17 Apr 2022 18:33:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Sun, 17 Apr 2022 18:33:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #64 received at 54914-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh
 <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 54914-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rpluim <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#54914: 28.1.50; Unable to form Brahmi conjuncts in Emacs
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 21:32:25 +0300
> From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 23:21:59 +0530
> Cc: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>, 54914 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> Looks good to me 👍
> 
> Again, thank you for your hard work.

Great, I'm therefore closing this bug.  Thanks to all who helped to
pull this through.




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 16 May 2022 11:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 35 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.