GNU bug report logs - #54864
GNU Cuirass reports arm64 as armhf

Previous Next

Full log

Message #11 received at 54864 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion <at> gmail.com>
To: 54864 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [Pending Patch]
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 19:57:44 -0400

Hi Bengt,

> I think IWBN if a busy volunteer like yourself could add
> a cookie in an email like yours that would automatically
> provide a "heads-up" to readers of the documentation you
> intend to patch.
> 
> The idea is that emails could be automatically scanned for
> such cookies/markup, e.g. maybe "[Pending-Patch]", next to
> an URL for the doc in question, which URL could then simply
> be appended to a log file of such urls, (maybe together with
> date and author from the email header).

I think this is a great idea. Does something like this already exist? If it
does, I'm unaware of it (and I am sorry I didn't use it here).

If I've otherwise misstepped some kind of convention here, please let me
know. I'm not great at picking up subtext, but it sounds like I messed up in
some way, and I'd like to learn so I don't do it again (still very new to
contributing to this community).

That said, I do indeed intend to patch [Pending-Patch]
https://guix.gnu.org/cuirass/manual/cuirass.html#Specifications to be clearer
about the available targets. I would amend the subject of this issue, but it
doesn't seem like that's something I can do.

--

Christopher Rodriguez

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.