GNU bug report logs - #54832
[patch] update glibc to 2.35

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: zamfofex <zamfofex <at> twdb.moe>

Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 01:21:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Greg Hogan <code <at> greghogan.com>
To: zamfofex <zamfofex <at> twdb.moe>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>, 54832 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#54832] [patch] update glibc to 2.35
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 15:16:12 -0400
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:14 PM zamfofex <zamfofex <at> twdb.moe> wrote:
>
> > There’s a comment at the top of ‘glibc-dl-cache.patch’ that explains
> > what it does, but see
> > <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2021/taming-the-stat-storm-with-a-loader-cache/>
> > for details.  I can take a look and update it.
>
> It seems we both misinterpreted the diff I had sent originally, as that patch has not actually been removed, but rather its line was changed (it was moved upwards). So good news, no need for changes or further investigation!

I have used your patch to bootstrap with GCC 12 (in order to use both
gcc-12 and llvm-14 in the same profile) and I have found that without
"glibc-ldd-x86_64.patch", sometimes ldd will throw a "not a dynamic
executable" error. I assume the powerpc patch is likewise still
required.

> Thanks for the encouragement! However, since glibc 2.36 releases a few weeks from now, do you feel like it would make sense to wait until then to update it? I suppose it could always be updated again later, but I don’t know if that’s ideal.

I would like to see the 2.35 upgrade since others may benefit before
the 2.36 release and in case of a core-updates merge to master.

Greg




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 318 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.