From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:35:17 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#54794: Clarify licence of guix.gnu.org screenshots Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 16:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 54794 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 54794@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.164943373331868 (code B ref -1); Fri, 08 Apr 2022 16:03:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Apr 2022 16:02:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35688 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ncr3s-0008Hu-KN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 12:02:12 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:47384) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ncr3p-0008Hm-Ug for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 12:02:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40670) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ncr3n-0005L0-TO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 12:02:08 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:47146) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ncr3j-0004SY-IR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 12:02:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=xj/LohJOAGB0h YfZbjlqTr4pdslEYZMNpdIDXM3timk=; h=subject:to:from:date; d=tobias.gr; b=NcPlI6HsO+viDwHixMsYbcpp8LlAK7MHHq1lGWIcJY6sfpcc5RVufWnJJRc7zLDA16Qy m9HE4IdiswMIb/fgpYfzOaOHn7cNxBnUbFXr3uAnvM6eFGZbfmOWLLoZGt1k9GAREtGaUc mIz+r/4aEwHMpr/LGjoYChR+RoOovDAcxNrXarHW3C+vVlj6QLFg9zveqAUbIcQx8B8DnX G7IOzZ+1hP6vQab3JZbHyHme7VMnWCq2wbXj32dl53bx+Lel2oNsbCbr2EUZkp8IlKDvxm ZsYW/qvmC8QC4vOoyUd69rhBZsHw3bCzcDed96rPlnrDmhUi7HahkglrR2f6u33A== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id eb0072bf for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 16:01:56 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 18:01:55 +0200 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Message-ID: <1e97dfb9757a91423af6dd164b558fd9@tobias.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) Guix, Devin Ulibarri from the FSF rightfully pointed out that the licence of, e.g., is not obvious. It should be made so on the Web page itself. From memory I'd say these are ‘public domain’, and [0] concurs, but I doubt [0] was explicitly intended to cover these images not contributed by Luis Felipe. My Web mail can't find it, but there's an ongoing thread about relicencing the blog posts to CC-(BY?)-SA-whatever 4.0. If it applies well to images (and I think it does), that or CC0 seem like the two obvious choices. Kind regards, T G-R Sent from a Web browser. Excuse or enjoy my brevity. [0]: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-artwork.git/tree/website/README#n101 — last section. From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:35:17 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#54794: Clarify licence of guix.gnu.org screenshots Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 16:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54794 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: 54794@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 54794-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54794.1649434512656 (code B ref 54794); Fri, 08 Apr 2022 16:16:02 +0000 Received: (at 54794) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Apr 2022 16:15:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35696 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ncrGR-0000AT-Rc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 12:15:12 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:59142) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ncrGP-0000AI-Uj for 54794@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 12:15:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=pxQki5Hagttfr jj89pH59TZLsRrPjeFrr6Q+ceRsQ+c=; h=references:in-reply-to:subject:cc: to:from:date; d=tobias.gr; b=pC+KhdeAzPwnxcGK25v18GrwhPrRGQLuxuIrKjYeR YkH1Pe5b0UWG4cyWUU4tl+SG3DAOA/tmZPhxePfp6fZmhUzI3DVljvblgab3srKo+K06V1 3GtnYV0ntxX7HPPDs+Fa24hLya2nJPyTSwGhDXEdwnOnIxMwQBkPgilGs9XFw3D27yyoKD WzGE4Cryio+yGVF/RVZ1cMdXiKrMmfJAVGpNqiERjRiOyAIlVMcj0wkPWNmSm9iW18VU1L wrkq0jgGcvwWOgZhUU0iHxIRbBSa/1W3AGaEr9nxwtk7C9w20a70vR7K25ptyLLxaJoUac gNXHIwPjQtCyF/g7Aoy5Q== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 3fca2621; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 16:15:05 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 18:15:05 +0200 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice In-Reply-To: <1e97dfb9757a91423af6dd164b558fd9@tobias.gr> References: <1e97dfb9757a91423af6dd164b558fd9@tobias.gr> Message-ID: <72ff546ea67b666ebce3392c7ec44026@tobias.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On 2022-04-08 18:01, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > or CC0 …was probably a stupid suggestion, as some of these images embed at least the CC-BY-SA 4.0 GNU Guix logo. (One wonders: are screenshots of incompatibly-licenced software artworks… illegal?) Kind regards, T G-R Sent from a Web browser. Excuse or enjoy my brevity. From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:35:17 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#54794: Clarify licence of guix.gnu.org screenshots Resent-From: Maxime Devos Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 19:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54794 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: 54794@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 54794-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54794.164944591120002 (code B ref 54794); Fri, 08 Apr 2022 19:26:01 +0000 Received: (at 54794) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Apr 2022 19:25:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35999 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ncuEJ-0005CW-5a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 15:25:11 -0400 Received: from xavier.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.52]:50724) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ncuEG-0005CL-I4 for 54794@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 15:25:09 -0400 Received: from [172.20.10.5] ([213.119.159.236]) by xavier.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id GKR52700G56K2kd01KR6Jt; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 21:25:06 +0200 Message-ID: From: Maxime Devos Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 21:24:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <72ff546ea67b666ebce3392c7ec44026@tobias.gr> References: <1e97dfb9757a91423af6dd164b558fd9@tobias.gr> <72ff546ea67b666ebce3392c7ec44026@tobias.gr> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-StkQMYQh4FZ1gwNrXdHv" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22; t=1649445906; bh=nvM8BQVSJBaOtcK13ogwzvkbluTVadwc5jjPYgfCkAs=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=dC4tG1Jzpw1vAIgjd+thxO8WfHqJDHV0EqB2qpzh9G03kGB6ZRkupViAIWM0uHq/r +6McUdpLmUGgW7Jw/TguwHiBiIOoeAPlPvuGp1j65E/NAK5PsLIc0Vox0KXhgfbiBV ybyeR4CP+sm8uGlEYYROvqiTGdVYFFeIm4VIEXrdHh9EDDzi7Aa0PO6nXjBaAhPDj4 WAPsFAexeGYjwxPJNyC1cMQbQHBz2LevQ61xbhOy65yI+c528wMsRe6IU0w/aMr/OX s3dJ8/zK5ZyQHfLXF3SRBhBtrKdiwiHAKtXZSFapZsywbDPVXIchN+9bn76c6Bf7Gz R/CoVml5XOfGQ== X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-StkQMYQh4FZ1gwNrXdHv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix schreef op vr 08-04- 2022 om 18:15 [+0200]: > On 2022-04-08 18:01, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix= =20 > wrote: > > or CC0 >=20 > =E2=80=A6was probably a stupid suggestion, as some of these images embed = at=20 > least the CC-BY-SA 4.0 GNU Guix logo. >=20 > (One wonders: are screenshots of incompatibly-licenced software=20 > artworks=E2=80=A6 illegal?) >=20 Wikimedia people have thought about things like this: . AFAICT they haven't looked into what happens if its a screenshot of multiple sofware things with incompatible licenses (e.g. some GPL-2- only and some GPL-3-only software) though ... Greetings, Maxime. --=-StkQMYQh4FZ1gwNrXdHv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYlCMCxccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7qgjAQCEDHzFtN+uPOMjmJSzToCDuyIg Vi2i2Ep08DvmovGMjwD+K8/tD7tO1ffUdR3gcKJEZ2evlZQeFuCUelKrGYJZRg4= =l6nC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-StkQMYQh4FZ1gwNrXdHv--