GNU bug report logs - #54783
ZRAM default priority wrong

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Stefan Baums <baums <at> stefanbaums.com>

Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 04:21:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #34 received at 54783-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>
Cc: 54783-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Baums <baums <at> stefanbaums.com>
Subject: Re: bug#54783: ZRAM default priority wrong
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 01:56:38 -0400
Hi Josselin,

[...]
>
> On the Guix side of things, we should really be using the same interface
> as swap-space, as I think the distinction between #f and 0 to 32767 is
> clearer.  I'll send some patches that adress this soon, along with the
> zram-service-type documentation.

I've made this smallish change:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
modified   gnu/services/linux.scm
@@ -296,14 +296,12 @@ (define (zram-device-configuration->udev-string config)
          "")
        "RUN+=\"/run/current-system/profile/sbin/mkswap /dev/zram0\" "
        "RUN+=\"/run/current-system/profile/sbin/swapon "
-       ;; XXX: The field is delayed while the deprecation warning remains in
-       ;; place, so we can't use match to fetch it (it would give a promise)
-       (if (zram-device-configuration-priority config)
-           (string-append "--priority "
-                          (number->string
-                           (zram-device-configuration-priority config))
-                          " ")
-         "")
+       ;; TODO: Revert to simply use 'priority' after removing the deprecation
+       ;; warning and the delayed property of the field.
+       (let ((priority* (force priority)))
+         (if priority*
+             (format #f "--priority ~a " priority*)
+             ""))
        "/dev/zram0\"\n"))))
 
 (define %zram-device-config
 
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Because the TODO comments seems more actionable for my future self, and
pushed as a99015c878.

Thanks Stefan for reporting the issue and for Josselin for fixing it!

Closing.

Maxim




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 38 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.