GNU bug report logs -
#54775
debbugs uses functions not available in Emacs 25.1
Previous Next
Reported by: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 20:02:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: moreinfo
Done: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 54775 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 54775 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54775
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 07 Apr 2022 20:02:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Thu, 07 Apr 2022 20:02:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Debbugs claims to support Emacs 25.1 but uses functions/arguments that
are not available in that release:
In debbugs-gnu-package-tabulated-list-print:
lib/debbugs/debbugs-gnu.el:735:36:Warning: alist-get called with 5 arguments,
but accepts only 2-4
In debbugs-gnu-show-all-blocking-reports:
lib/debbugs/debbugs-gnu.el:1404:14:Warning: alist-get called with 5 arguments,
but accepts only 2-4
In debbugs-gnu-emacs-release-blocking-reports:
lib/debbugs/debbugs-gnu.el:1429:7:Warning: ‘(id (alist-get release
debbugs-gnu-emacs-blocking-reports nil nil (function equal)))’ is a
malformed function
lib/debbugs/debbugs-gnu.el:1433:70:Warning: reference to free variable ‘id’
lib/debbugs/debbugs-gnu.el:1434:33:Warning: reference to free variable
‘blockers’
In debbugs-gnu-jump-to-bug:
lib/debbugs/debbugs-gnu.el:2105:24:Warning: attempt to let-bind nonvariable
‘(memql bugid (debbugs-gnu-implicit-ids))’
In end of data:
lib/debbugs/debbugs-gnu.el:2927:1:Warning: the following functions are not
known to be defined: if-let*, blockers, string-replace
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54775
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 08 Apr 2022 13:21:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 54775 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li> writes:
> Debbugs claims to support Emacs 25.1 but uses functions/arguments that
> are not available in that release:
Michael, should we just bump the required version to 28.1, perhaps? I
think debbugs is mostly useful for people that follow Emacs development.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Request was from
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 08 Apr 2022 13:21:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54775
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 08 Apr 2022 13:26:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #13 received at 54775 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
Hi Lars,
>> Debbugs claims to support Emacs 25.1 but uses functions/arguments that
>> are not available in that release:
>
> Michael, should we just bump the required version to 28.1, perhaps? I
> think debbugs is mostly useful for people that follow Emacs development.
I'm already thinking about this for a while. I believe by requiring Emacs
28.1 we would lose several users. Perhaps bumping to just 26.1?
Jonas, I guess you have a reason to report this. Do you still work with
Emacs 25?
Best regards, Michael.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54775
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 08 Apr 2022 16:20:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 54775 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de> writes:
> Jonas, I guess you have a reason to report this. Do you still work with
> Emacs 25?
Hell no! But there are people who want to use an ancient Emacsen (or
are being forced to do so by their employer) but also the very latest
Magit, so I am forced to occasionally check if things still work in 25.
When doing that I also have to recompile other packages and ran into
this issue.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54775
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 08 Apr 2022 16:46:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 54775 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li> writes:
Hi Jonas,
> Hell no! But there are people who want to use an ancient Emacsen (or
> are being forced to do so by their employer) but also the very latest
> Magit, so I am forced to occasionally check if things still work in 25.
> When doing that I also have to recompile other packages and ran into
> this issue.
I see. I'll try to make debbugs compatible with Emacs 25, but it might
take some days ...
Best regards, Michael.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54775
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 08 Apr 2022 21:56:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #22 received at 54775 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de> writes:
> Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li> writes:
>
> Hi Jonas,
>
>> Hell no! But there are people who want to use an ancient Emacsen (or
>> are being forced to do so by their employer) but also the very latest
>> Magit, so I am forced to occasionally check if things still work in 25.
>> When doing that I also have to recompile other packages and ran into
>> this issue.
>
> I see. I'll try to make debbugs compatible with Emacs 25, but it might
> take some days ...
You don't have to do that for me! I don't use debbugs *while* checking
whether my packages are still backward compatible. I just happen to
recompile every package that I have installed when I do that (except for
those that I have already added to my list of packages that are not
backward compatible).
I just described how I came across those warnings. I reported to inform
the maintainers that they should do *something* about it. I didn't mean
to imply that in those situations I have an urgent need for debbugs to
be usable. Depending on a more recent Emacs would be perfectly fine
with me.
Jonas
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54775
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 09 Apr 2022 08:27:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #25 received at 54775 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li> writes:
Hi Jonas,
>> I see. I'll try to make debbugs compatible with Emacs 25, but it might
>> take some days ...
>
> You don't have to do that for me! I don't use debbugs *while* checking
> whether my packages are still backward compatible. I just happen to
> recompile every package that I have installed when I do that (except for
> those that I have already added to my list of packages that are not
> backward compatible).
>
> I just described how I came across those warnings. I reported to inform
> the maintainers that they should do *something* about it. I didn't mean
> to imply that in those situations I have an urgent need for debbugs to
> be usable. Depending on a more recent Emacs would be perfectly fine
> with me.
Thanks for being kind :-)
Finally, I've lifted the requirement to Emacs 26.1. This seems to be a
good compromise between not losing too many users, and applying minimal
changes.
Releaaed as debbugs 0.32.
> Jonas
Best regards, Michael.
bug closed, send any further explanations to
54775 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li>
Request was from
Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 09 Apr 2022 08:28:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 07 May 2022 11:24:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 46 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.