GNU bug report logs -
#54733
Match again in perform-replace
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
>>>> + (replace-search search-string limit
>>>> + regexp-flag delimited-flag
>>>> + case-fold-search backward))
>>>
>>> I don't know this code too well, but perhaps SEARCH_STRING here should be
>>> anchored with something like "\\=" at the beginning?
>>>
>>> Otherwise the search can succeed here even if the next match is not
>>> here. Not sure how important that is, though.
>>
>> I'm afraid that prepending "\\=" might break a complex regexp somehow.
>
> Another variant without modifying the original regexp is still to call
> replace-search, but afterwards check if it stayed at the old position
A third variant is to add a new variable `looking-at-function'
that is like `isearch-search-fun-function', so everyone who needs
to redefine the search function, will also need to redefine
the looking-at function.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 350 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.