From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:13:39 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#54685 <54685@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#54685 <54685@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 28.0.92; incorrect font on new frame after menu-set-font (Win32) Reply-To: bug#54685 <54685@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:13:39 +0000 retitle 54685 28.0.92; incorrect font on new frame after menu-set-font (Win= 32) reassign 54685 emacs submitter 54685 Corwin Brust severity 54685 normal tag 54685 moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 02 19:49:21 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Apr 2022 23:49:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47114 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nanUf-0003zR-Ed for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2022 19:49:21 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:54516) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nanUe-0003zK-AT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2022 19:49:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nanUe-0001vW-38 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2022 19:49:20 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f47.google.com ([209.85.208.47]:42908) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nanUc-0005My-AW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2022 19:49:19 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f47.google.com with SMTP id a17so6985128edm.9 for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2022 16:49:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vtnaPIi3AnLdwMfISlMCt66YacXcbFZA6+6MTMTZcxY=; b=k8RxomxDplYKnWbWkJqs+FfJtPAfwByDFEnlj5XBYqYgbvIRLCMi6XOZtX7CyBkIN0 6eKKXs0701fa0HowoCE8JtDMnCRCcTzjTMLfnwG/axaoIzCmR7sfrjPHZhTFL9z52dPE uDWkOSi1VuOEHPjkf/LuIONPRw6RI6l+btQD0TUdAHwyUNcGJCxh/ACI9ntBcJzv+bZP Rtiqy9TJvklFCPx6vsP7DeOdYyghBhl/a8hHW6C4ZfHn8KRMMvN9q/t/ML/M2fmqATZh MBcTWSZNrkoQK/jsJ//PrBKPHkBDUCv5wS9PSIxix+mYScxUvFfSP63i6kFedazcg66f vVwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ZGy2koRa6itjwtDYpozeUwXHYzpBDdiyqTHi5VkX3zqRSFuGI AJBk9UZ9LkXJ+9Be5z38SZmF/+OIvmJ8WOtFGxyKBH99D98= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQuC6RCuvXw8m5LRI+nrSPy+BEVY2WxQC+nEWRzRgCBPcSYvfJucLEeYSt4Qvzlj8pY1RSuzqyCRWyT4hsTtU= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d84c:0:b0:41c:b8ef:a159 with SMTP id f12-20020aa7d84c000000b0041cb8efa159mr2598498eds.126.1648943350644; Sat, 02 Apr 2022 16:49:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Corwin Brust Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 18:48:59 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: 28.0.92; incorrect font on new frame after menu-set-font (Win32) To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.208.47; envelope-from=mplscorwin@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-f47.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) Steps to reproduce: 1. emacs -Q 2. From the Menu, select Options | Set Default Font 3. Pick a distinct looking font (I'm using Robot Light at 17pts) 4. C-x 5 2 (open a new frame) What I expected: The new frame should use the font just selected as the default What Happened: The new frame selects another font. Using M-- C-x = in the scratch buffer suggests it's choosing: harfbuzz:-outline-Adobe Devanagari-normal-normal-normal-serif-13-*-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 Here are some screenshots (as links). The original frame after menu-sent font: https://bru.st/i/emacs_eVUJ7FAScU.png And from the new frame where menu-set-font doesn't appear to DTRT: https://bru.st/i/emacs_vmq9PKp6q0.png In GNU Emacs 28.0.92 (build 2, x86_64-w64-mingw32) of 2022-03-23 built on AVALON Repository revision: 8e7a3f21e00649bacc01be627edd45ff01b51a33 Repository branch: emacs-28 Windowing system distributor 'Microsoft Corp.', version 10.0.19043 System Description: Microsoft Windows 10 Home (v10.0.2009.19043.1620) Configured using: 'configure --without-dbus --with-native-compilation --without-compress-install CFLAGS=-O2' Configured features: ACL GIF GMP GNUTLS HARFBUZZ JPEG JSON LCMS2 LIBXML2 MODULES NATIVE_COMP NOTIFY W32NOTIFY PDUMPER PNG RSVG SOUND THREADS TIFF TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS XPM ZLIB Important settings: value of $LANG: ENU locale-coding-system: cp1252 Major mode: Lisp Interaction Minor modes in effect: tooltip-mode: t global-eldoc-mode: t eldoc-mode: t show-paren-mode: t electric-indent-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t indent-tabs-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow sort mail-extr pp wid-edit descr-text emacsbug message rmc puny dired dired-loaddefs rfc822 mml mml-sec epa derived epg rfc6068 epg-config gnus-util rmail rmail-loaddefs auth-source eieio eieio-core eieio-loaddefs password-cache json map text-property-search mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader sendmail comp comp-cstr warnings rx cl-seq cl-macs cl-extra help-mode seq byte-opt gv bytecomp byte-compile cconv rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mail-utils time-date subr-x cl-loaddefs cl-lib iso-transl tooltip eldoc paren electric uniquify ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type elisp-mode mwheel dos-w32 ls-lisp disp-table term/w32-win w32-win w32-vars term/common-win tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list replace newcomment text-mode lisp-mode prog-mode register page tab-bar menu-bar rfn-eshadow isearch easymenu timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax font-core term/tty-colors frame minibuffer cl-generic cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese eucjp-ms cp51932 hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese composite emoji-zwj charscript charprop case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev obarray cl-preloaded nadvice button loaddefs faces cus-face macroexp files window text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote threads w32notify w32 lcms2 multi-tty make-network-process native-compile emacs) Memory information: ((conses 16 108040 16222) (symbols 48 22422 1) (strings 32 85980 2308) (string-bytes 1 2074425) (vectors 16 19681) (vector-slots 8 778062 43900) (floats 8 42 209) (intervals 56 335 1) (buffers 992 13)) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 03 01:21:03 2022 Received: (at 54685) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Apr 2022 05:21:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47343 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nasfe-0004GY-NN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 01:21:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49258) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nasfS-0004DE-3U for 54685@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 01:21:01 -0400 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=60078 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nasfL-000871-Hb; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 01:20:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=eY3AUgmBEWWxHlhd2/LraK6TzhleAUIMw3tlIo/EpEw=; b=GGWHBQcxP1SJ RLxNSBGIySPmc0Jiyav+ZfmgnuJ097c8VYNK3H5uCl01aRGF6lyGjdBQ95LOOpCN0XCUmlIe+NZI+ prLC6BQqOwtp6inSfQbvqV7AzrhgEsYrklxVqmzhY/effBjUuLKR9FpNbwy5qz5kdDosY+tB0sA27 7zbmjngXL4WD+S8x4FyJog9ZjP0XmGfKaQyds4yuuDQebOC1UZrzIxno5n7LgptSYrW+HLc4dI6a9 qeFISZmi01s9nS/vLlDnCu4D2LhdtbyNXQxEsBwBHVRzZ3eSvwqfcR4ChvShw6iBPSrIMb/jovUos m/bPO5cldWn/89e6xXQeZw==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1304 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nasfL-0006F5-02; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 01:20:43 -0400 Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2022 08:20:42 +0300 Message-Id: <8335iu4uad.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Corwin Brust In-Reply-To: (message from Corwin Brust on Sat, 2 Apr 2022 18:48:59 -0500) Subject: Re: bug#54685: 28.0.92; incorrect font on new frame after menu-set-font (Win32) References: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 54685 Cc: 54685@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Corwin Brust > Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 18:48:59 -0500 > > Steps to reproduce: > 1. emacs -Q > 2. From the Menu, select Options | Set Default Font > 3. Pick a distinct looking font (I'm using Robot Light at 17pts) > 4. C-x 5 2 (open a new frame) > > What I expected: > The new frame should use the font just selected as the default > > What Happened: > The new frame selects another font. Using M-- C-x = in the scratch > buffer suggests it's choosing: > harfbuzz:-outline-Adobe > Devanagari-normal-normal-normal-serif-13-*-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1 I cannot reproduce this here. It works as expected for me: the same font is used on a new frame. Does this happen for any font on your system, or just for that one? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 03 08:15:57 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Apr 2022 12:15:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47866 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1naz93-0001Nb-59 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 08:15:57 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:60344) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1naz91-0001GE-TH for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 08:15:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Z3GoIFClWKBA0AeuRuuKeT7eHAhhE9GSYqVjKaxBXmc=; b=ibiR6cOx3f2i6DNtELQdwMkPyY uDcpcQMphBpm01TdtvD2i49f134iq0cRVugIAMH36DVD3XQgoLbwXNgwnmCOVUgw9Zi8jKmyUcCcb aR/oIydLsonUCjzY+5PvL1nlA/ryuGQ5Ioexhuj1ACXhlSjnpVfWfZsxXJP+HnLG2X9Q=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1naz8u-0007Zq-5b for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 14:15:42 +0200 Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2022 14:15:38 +0200 Message-Id: <877d86jrbp.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #54685 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 54685 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 54685 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 03 10:49:49 2022 Received: (at 54685) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Apr 2022 14:49:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49222 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nb1Y5-0000gz-N7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 10:49:49 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f42.google.com ([209.85.208.42]:34641) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nb1Y3-0000gm-RR for 54685@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 10:49:48 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f42.google.com with SMTP id r10so2491097eda.1 for <54685@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 07:49:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yw72f0S/YDiUgKJs58KTZIOP+RaMG/Y0zHOpPkkRgwQ=; b=0k5YCMODCRbIyu0BWM6UhieexRHDsyanguJ5qFFHnTn7sYNmgIZ/g69mbzhxehtkWS N+QiNuCet0wMfyIP3LR0o1guzuZRd/6qo5ZTWfLBj6F9YerpNUXgdue6wSBMNxfl+2/G x6wqs9Jwosa2Y7s9jRQzBd07LUSbTudP3E2oV9bVGxfHOITZ9GgxvGWvP+hrbLuEHQZG lkUxEMGkJ+8xAY2sLo+j/CCHKvMiMONoJgkzU+R7xQuWa114eQFvaZgsiEhBJL6XEIaH 4IkvMDmbUPzi0jhTDfJytdh82aJAZ+vjmoMRo9pSgdteG1kGwKBKdds7b+B6jntmm714 FdQA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5328jPWFVE4ee7FD1h0UuY5v941GTSPqmn5HEAmbTPDARh0cHMgR k4uSTL1wkFeFdEKzrV0KGJKatvVFcYE6flOTfI8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzg+e+0znQbGrS48qD/r9IxlE2npOtgy7PmXe9gcJ9ifFqSk1f2XBMljRTvk2Sio9+8CmysGwdo1pC35z/2xUY= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d84c:0:b0:41c:b8ef:a159 with SMTP id f12-20020aa7d84c000000b0041cb8efa159mr4812613eds.126.1648997381872; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 07:49:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8335iu4uad.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <8335iu4uad.fsf@gnu.org> From: Corwin Brust Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2022 09:49:30 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#54685: 28.0.92; incorrect font on new frame after menu-set-font (Win32) To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 54685 Cc: 54685@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 12:20 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Does this happen for any font on your system, or just for that one? It appears (this same) incorrect font is used for the new frame when the default is set to any font's "Light" variant. Font without a light variant has no issue, nor is there an issue when I don't choose the Light variant. I didn't try every font on my system, if there is any particular font you'd like me to try LMK. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 03 11:03:56 2022 Received: (at 54685) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Apr 2022 15:03:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49247 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nb1lk-00012h-Fh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 11:03:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53262) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nb1li-00012U-QL for 54685@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 11:03:55 -0400 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=37132 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nb1ld-0003ir-3K; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 11:03:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=T67OYL1q1hN442iU85ZqP5rnSz3GUgZS5yL178QTWgE=; b=nmvM7w0K8gTW btToivFerjOANtj/VTYCgW0yJfbWHZUt0SbXsiIiLwCW/ZO3Dk8yQi0r26Vw2TcA3MO7YbO5OTNpj /OQWbCl3CU1aOM+ek8skD5luxOwC3FP+garxdTlJb9w1XaHycstGDG7z7DFgOAuKfsMfmI0jdtV+F UZABVjnW2ivvR74BNP8MbmITuiBGtItXF+xcqU6cCKu6yV0mCjhYSAk+/TfHgv+7T8/ztV3H0mH4+ knkVRV4p0DKhzFHy4sCkEkAmltA00fGUmyKi4jMXUVD45NA00B4MAAQHrXWJKUiFinxlHOXOdEgnj WgH9quYJ9OP5PCHOEDPn7g==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4549 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nb1lO-0002F2-55; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 11:03:39 -0400 Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2022 18:03:33 +0300 Message-Id: <83fsmufbui.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Corwin Brust In-Reply-To: (message from Corwin Brust on Sun, 3 Apr 2022 09:49:30 -0500) Subject: Re: bug#54685: 28.0.92; incorrect font on new frame after menu-set-font (Win32) References: <8335iu4uad.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 54685 Cc: 54685@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Corwin Brust > Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2022 09:49:30 -0500 > Cc: 54685@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 12:20 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > Does this happen for any font on your system, or just for that one? > > It appears (this same) incorrect font is used for the new frame when > the default is set to any font's "Light" variant. Font without a > light variant has no issue, nor is there an issue when I don't choose > the Light variant. What other variants of this font do you have there? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 03 11:53:25 2022 Received: (at 54685) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Apr 2022 15:53:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49305 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nb2Xc-0004Q0-T5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 11:53:25 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f46.google.com ([209.85.208.46]:44976) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nb2Xa-0004Pn-Lh for 54685@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 11:53:23 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f46.google.com with SMTP id u9so3212789edd.11 for <54685@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 08:53:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9THf3N9d/CaanNCV6AXSwhaMva3BS9wB2NkSqIkAUTg=; b=uSRX6hOioKFi7CCViDPRbyRf4FwMIwdUKP0eqEbepc6nkSyhWnM0qU3Iz1fWs/QX3Y n3A83HeN/EAG2WqwOUlqS+fUC+mwDwyw/YpBekxTmS94M/5jLq1tzozGfymONegziFnc +cldvAPVlF80ZvQYMQOosR1uvGq/hw62BklYn38hvEIH/bF0MH0o7Q702H1sgvCtUB6O 58I74yknZRdhLF9dquYI7BQFyKJ0ZjAa7tfHs+QZp4rnqTUthmkQvNYf6RsyGQIB05lD MF2+kOl1CHDDXhy8gxHsVMZrqrBvZCDHnrDLX0Y8gw7p59e6FFsDL92xm82X3xzMc5wo io/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531KK3lE0dYteVZigKPq1XxfxSGKhuIvhH4DbLgLSzXctQv1HIwz Hgh9UQW2Cgq0ugkSreyWxyyY9Oc91S8X1s+kDrropLJWY98= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwdaYfboN9m8CDxw7ALeiH6O3o8H5vdETWGtwZz9X2fzpocpOrqQKspn7Ts59z4JF3qSSU7C8BU3EdtOnu6QAM= X-Received: by 2002:a50:fa96:0:b0:41c:c19b:a2e6 with SMTP id w22-20020a50fa96000000b0041cc19ba2e6mr3030245edr.259.1649001196742; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 08:53:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8335iu4uad.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsmufbui.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83fsmufbui.fsf@gnu.org> From: Corwin Brust Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2022 10:53:05 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#54685: 28.0.92; incorrect font on new frame after menu-set-font (Win32) To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 54685 Cc: 54685@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 10:03 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > What other variants of this font do you have there? Here are all of the variants I have for the "Fira Sans" font. Thin** Thin Italic** UltraLight** UltraLight Italic** ExtraLight Italic** ExtraLight** Light** Light Italic** Semi Light** Semi Light Italic** Regular Italic Medium Medium Italic SemiBold** SemiBold Italic** Bold Bold Italic ExtraBold** ExtraBold Italic** Heavy** Heavy Italic** All variants appear correctly after I select them as default in the initial frame. Those followed by ** exhibit the problem: they aren't used in the new frame after the variant was selected as default in the initial frame. It's a bit time-consuming to iterate over all variants so I started with a font that has lots of variants. Let me know if you'd like me to try with some of the other fonts where I've been able to reproduce the problem. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 03 12:12:15 2022 Received: (at 54685) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Apr 2022 16:12:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49318 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nb2pq-0004rf-Qk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 12:12:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59746) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nb2pp-0004rU-AQ for 54685@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 12:12:13 -0400 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=38512 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nb2pk-0003o0-1L; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 12:12:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=q5mXNLGHE0iwbRb1+guRL6cG9SyCnO2zNaBxc1sYpAM=; b=b73gIYEnt2ZG 38lIkkdGGH2scKIf7d4EAGTfa3CTOEGmTbr9ZR+NKIwid9552BXImN7oPAsN4xH7WTAViG16cA8xy 08fWpgsqnd1kkQxJ2W+spojIPACOUaU1JQef4wUUk+gBQHgOTlka9aWPauexiN81YSwwccCne4q5E FS8gC7h5eGbHGZ9uf0mj2lxGBbGino2UJMa+oxAo/gwbT9lmlugHrLGVrbtYA1/FCgJXIoXd4E26h 3MJIyez4tWKYjkYQfqQEm5T5NoA4D3njeT7GRZzGTCj7ATWeEh+B+7kkeNv6zCICaXpgycW0yBiiN whzhgqzm+yXVqXlncPVPMg==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4893 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nb2pj-000862-HN; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 12:12:07 -0400 Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2022 19:12:07 +0300 Message-Id: <83a6d2f8o8.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Corwin Brust In-Reply-To: (message from Corwin Brust on Sun, 3 Apr 2022 10:53:05 -0500) Subject: Re: bug#54685: 28.0.92; incorrect font on new frame after menu-set-font (Win32) References: <8335iu4uad.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsmufbui.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 54685 Cc: 54685@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Corwin Brust > Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2022 10:53:05 -0500 > Cc: 54685@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 10:03 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > What other variants of this font do you have there? > > Here are all of the variants I have for the "Fira Sans" font. (Why are we suddenly talking about Fira Sans, when your original report was about Robot?) > Thin** > Thin Italic** > UltraLight** > UltraLight Italic** > ExtraLight Italic** > ExtraLight** > Light** > Light Italic** > Semi Light** > Semi Light Italic** > Regular > Italic > Medium > Medium Italic > SemiBold** > SemiBold Italic** > Bold > Bold Italic > ExtraBold** > ExtraBold Italic** > Heavy** > Heavy Italic** > > All variants appear correctly after I select them as default in the > initial frame. Those followed by ** exhibit the problem: they aren't > used in the new frame after the variant was selected as default in the > initial frame. If so, then this is expected. The APIs we use on MS-Windows to enumerate fonts in a font family consider only 4 font varieties to belong to the same family: Regular, Italic, Bold, and Bold-Italic. All the other varieties aren't returned by those APIs when we request to list all the fonts in a family. (I don't know if this is just the deficiency of the APIs we use, or a general issue with how fonts are managed on Windows.) So any font variety that is not one of those 4 will cause trouble sooner or later. (Medium is special, because we have an extra-special kludge to allow Medium when Regular is being sought.) So I think what you see is expected: on Windows one cannot select a Light (or Thin, or UltraLight, or SemiBold, or ...) font for the default face and hope that it will work as expected. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 03 12:23:44 2022 Received: (at 54685) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Apr 2022 16:23:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49335 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nb30y-00058z-0A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 12:23:44 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f49.google.com ([209.85.208.49]:39643) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nb30v-00058m-Rl for 54685@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 12:23:42 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f49.google.com with SMTP id g20so8371910edw.6 for <54685@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 09:23:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bjx9VKnqdqk6aRAE/V8VemSVMvVzZXjHqtO3kGSkpCM=; b=tT5EsahVeRa5wS7yuWSA4ZM3o8VQdtgrb5yzjgq+Rke2ydGxPFLRdjqcGFuon05UwL yuFTDQgC1x4v59xsTA7gUP5//eak6C+oq6ZpUj1JWcouBRYlZQ7SObwOFEYlHLBi1YuG 8v7SEI4eZvRM8a5hzXnqJJnI+9JMgYjyrE3QvlKBDwPox1+MnIMoYxd86ioxfgTCClwf 0GC16x4H/InedVeHaJZNVDm13Aib4YbAllnTmvunp3zVW2USSM5v3gts44UZSoD/zvCZ +ozR1DlpN8JdykpxsqNbmDk6GQiSS7icOCQKIv7v3dUsAe7buWX+UEeDbTkfPW3im3dj 9dlw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533mu0ZwSgTtd9aSKa33S/ql+wlvqVMTugGHXqP6VE2KMUH7qDWq 9irO2126J5usC61uqbDwty2KrpVQDq05+nDEHDssE7OL X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwqfBO5neZC/a5kIudw2E/IUnkR1sZf8q/JgCdbLp8M3cCf0oQy/gs6l4vnn8zcZRyS9gOxINJje9zI55Yn+18= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dd88:0:b0:41c:c008:d8e2 with SMTP id g8-20020aa7dd88000000b0041cc008d8e2mr3649016edv.309.1649003016063; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 09:23:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8335iu4uad.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsmufbui.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6d2f8o8.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83a6d2f8o8.fsf@gnu.org> From: Corwin Brust Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2022 11:23:25 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#54685: 28.0.92; incorrect font on new frame after menu-set-font (Win32) To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 54685 Cc: 54685@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 11:12 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Corwin Brust > > Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2022 10:53:05 -0500 > > Cc: 54685@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 10:03 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > > > What other variants of this font do you have there? > > > > Here are all of the variants I have for the "Fira Sans" font. > > (Why are we suddenly talking about Fira Sans, when your original > report was about Robot?) As I said in my prior, I selected the "problematic" font having the most variants. I can repeat the experiment with Robot if that's useful, but I think it isn't per your comments, quoted below: > > If so, then this is expected. The APIs we use on MS-Windows to > enumerate fonts in a font family consider only 4 font varieties to > belong to the same family: Regular, Italic, Bold, and Bold-Italic. > All the other varieties aren't returned by those APIs when we request > to list all the fonts in a family. (I don't know if this is just the > deficiency of the APIs we use, or a general issue with how fonts are > managed on Windows.) So any font variety that is not one of those 4 > will cause trouble sooner or later. (Medium is special, because we > have an extra-special kludge to allow Medium when Regular is being > sought.) > > So I think what you see is expected: on Windows one cannot select a > Light (or Thin, or UltraLight, or SemiBold, or ...) font for the > default face and hope that it will work as expected. In which case I think this bug report can be closed. Thank you. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 03 12:34:23 2022 Received: (at 54685-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Apr 2022 16:34:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49343 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nb3BH-0005P4-2L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 12:34:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33876) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nb3BF-0005Oq-2Y for 54685-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 12:34:21 -0400 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=38920 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nb3B9-0006Yv-OG; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 12:34:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=++pj/RDUwdVGidiTajVtpkRZfiUs/a4RmMd7dLC6whM=; b=ctIQIUX/jqZ0 Yv3PjuoQYkdaot7/Rl9F2n2QHv6eadpxA6yTAn6Q2fiTA8oEgZgEXpU44RaTNw9tdaus/TZumv6bG jr0MgcSLFkry9qmoo5wNIWaANQswZez7SU6KanFUpVXzuZwHsPG3LCFOED/LFJmJJLttiIQjqAlI2 z0LQy0Ip/vul2aBJ7V/FoPWZUlHRvVhjmNUBDeTfXvQENtMdAS/0bn2ew7ePPgF2Wxona6OjNr+EV OUHVKEeRqnkzocW1KbyOU3OFm31+04Cm2uWuZjG7AnGlim9rGKgymnYdBfXTAUICdhBqScTkXrrhZ NfcPf9a3jiw49zksGPQMKw==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2297 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nb3B9-0006Po-8V; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 12:34:15 -0400 Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2022 19:34:15 +0300 Message-Id: <838rsmf7nc.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Corwin Brust In-Reply-To: (message from Corwin Brust on Sun, 3 Apr 2022 11:23:25 -0500) Subject: Re: bug#54685: 28.0.92; incorrect font on new frame after menu-set-font (Win32) References: <8335iu4uad.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsmufbui.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6d2f8o8.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 54685-done Cc: 54685-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Corwin Brust > Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2022 11:23:25 -0500 > Cc: 54685@debbugs.gnu.org > > > If so, then this is expected. The APIs we use on MS-Windows to > > enumerate fonts in a font family consider only 4 font varieties to > > belong to the same family: Regular, Italic, Bold, and Bold-Italic. > > All the other varieties aren't returned by those APIs when we request > > to list all the fonts in a family. (I don't know if this is just the > > deficiency of the APIs we use, or a general issue with how fonts are > > managed on Windows.) So any font variety that is not one of those 4 > > will cause trouble sooner or later. (Medium is special, because we > > have an extra-special kludge to allow Medium when Regular is being > > sought.) > > > > So I think what you see is expected: on Windows one cannot select a > > Light (or Thin, or UltraLight, or SemiBold, or ...) font for the > > default face and hope that it will work as expected. > > In which case I think this bug report can be closed. Thank you. Done. I will at some time add a PROBLEMS entry about this. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Apr 15 08:39:55 2022 Received: (at 54685) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2022 12:39:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58306 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nfLEw-0004WZ-QP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 08:39:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47094) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nfLEv-0004WL-0p for 54685@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 08:39:53 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54150) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nfLEi-00015U-Ml; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 08:39:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=POSNgD816Xfa7rWF+AUMA0OYVq85TPOipxa2D1CHeCI=; b=aI54b0z5y/c3 R4KqXdOypPTpK7JutVWFqalk0pakcGPMSOa1+lSwv6AHZcHETFFwQtg3U0RWwxDIXlmdTkEEKLibR PUAVdr3TDZuCSUCg50YCfJCuxXaVv0ccnY8WIP8wcftJyvy0Htzz4ihbZVDIwOMxhGRQ1pNXhaXSm awOBHX77loWDSENSAYkobj/isprJJom119uGRPGyhNS6CexeSWvMyVtnm/t2ugh1TVSicnjmtPOIL 0pqUrINL/q8IWOHXcCkwmCSz15YKJCFva47Lg1qKFcZ5m2NrDoaRJ+rxy2K1axQLBpr6DhDnEkPa3 Hqj9JZBJZrNPZSjExIMFEw==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3659 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nfLET-0006Ho-BL; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 08:39:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 15:39:37 +0300 Message-Id: <831qxy34hi.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: corwin@bru.st In-Reply-To: <838rsmf7nc.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 03 Apr 2022 19:34:15 +0300) Subject: Re: bug#54685: 28.0.92; incorrect font on new frame after menu-set-font (Win32) References: <8335iu4uad.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsmufbui.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6d2f8o8.fsf@gnu.org> <838rsmf7nc.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 54685 Cc: 54685@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2022 19:34:15 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 54685-done@debbugs.gnu.org > > > From: Corwin Brust > > Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2022 11:23:25 -0500 > > Cc: 54685@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > > If so, then this is expected. The APIs we use on MS-Windows to > > > enumerate fonts in a font family consider only 4 font varieties to > > > belong to the same family: Regular, Italic, Bold, and Bold-Italic. > > > All the other varieties aren't returned by those APIs when we request > > > to list all the fonts in a family. (I don't know if this is just the > > > deficiency of the APIs we use, or a general issue with how fonts are > > > managed on Windows.) So any font variety that is not one of those 4 > > > will cause trouble sooner or later. (Medium is special, because we > > > have an extra-special kludge to allow Medium when Regular is being > > > sought.) > > > > > > So I think what you see is expected: on Windows one cannot select a > > > Light (or Thin, or UltraLight, or SemiBold, or ...) font for the > > > default face and hope that it will work as expected. > > > > In which case I think this bug report can be closed. Thank you. > > Done. I will at some time add a PROBLEMS entry about this. Now done. From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:13:39 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator