Subject: Re: bug#54624: 29.0.50; textsec and ipv6 addresses

From: Andreas Schwab <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2022 19:49:57 +0200

On Apr 03 2022, Mattias Engdegård wrote:

> Would you mind if I removed some ambiguity from the regexps then? Maybe even simplifying them to "[0-9.]+" and "[0-9a-f:]+" respectively?

Note that an IPv6 address notation can contain dots too.  This is useful
for mapped IPv4 addresses.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, [email-masked]
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510  2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."