Subject: bug#54624: 29.0.50; textsec and ipv6 addresses

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2022 19:09:20 +0200

Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]> writes:

>> While this is correct, I'm not sure it was Lars's intention to cover
>> addresses in that format, or that it would be desirable to do so in
>> the context of textsec. Do you agree?
>
> That was indeed my intention.

(But that's separate from the new ipvx function -- that one was already
not deemed suspicious before that function was added.)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no