Subject: bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed

From: Andreas Schwab <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:03:15 +0100

On Mär 25 2022, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>> From: Andreas Schwab <[email-masked]>
>> Cc: [email-masked],  [email-masked],  [email-masked]
>> Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:14:27 +0100
>> 
>> On Mär 25 2022, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> 
>> > By which composition rule?  Isn't that because U+20E3 is a combining
>> > character?
>> 
>> Sure.  If Emacs were able to do that even if the default does not
>> contain U+20E3 that would be ideal.  Or if Emacs were able to combine a
>> and U+0308 even if the latter is not avaliable in the default font.
>
> I think Emacs only considers the font of the base character when it
> tries to compose?

I guess that's the difference between Emacs and other display engines.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, [email-masked]
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510  2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."