Subject: Re: bug#54501: Segfault on recursive structure

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:04:19 +0100

Andreas Schwab <[email-masked]> writes:

> That's an side effect of the implementation: (nil) is the placeholder
> object which #0# then references.

Ah, right.  Should it signal an error instead, do you think?

> Does it crash in substitute_object_recurse?

Yup.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no