GNU bug report logs - #54440
Updates for genext2fs and genimage

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>

Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 00:40:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>
Subject: bug#54440: closed (Re: bug#54440: Updates for genext2fs and genimage)
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 22:16:01 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#54440: Updates for genext2fs and genimage

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 54440 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
54440: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=54440
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 54440-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#54440: Updates for genext2fs and genimage
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 15:15:04 -0700
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
On 2022-03-19, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org> skribis:
>
>> I have updates for genext2fs and genimage!
>>
>> Newer versions of the genext2fs tool have support for things like
>> SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, and Guix seems keen on reproducible builds, so Guix
>> may as well have the latest and greatest genext2fs!
>
> Yup, sounds like an interesting option!  I’m not sure yet it can be used
> as a drop-in replacement in (gnu build images), but we’ll see.

I have seen instructions for adding features using tune2fs after the
fact to make it ext3 or ext4 ... or other arbitrary features (though not
all can be) and who knows how that will affect the reproducibility of
the image!

>> Updating genext2fs triggered test suite failures in genimage, which I
>> also noticed was a slightly out of date... so updated that too!
...
> The patches LGTM, thank you!

Pushed as:

ba1ce250c8d2d0d3c215e06d722f8d561cbe095f gnu: genimage: Update to 15.
8aae96b44c2e84f31574200aa71c6ee4979b1620 gnu: genext2fs: Update to 1.5.0.


live well,
  vagrant
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: Updates for genext2fs and genimage
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 17:39:45 -0700
[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]
I have updates for genext2fs and genimage!

Newer versions of the genext2fs tool have support for things like
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, and Guix seems keen on reproducible builds, so Guix
may as well have the latest and greatest genext2fs!

Updating genext2fs triggered test suite failures in genimage, which I
also noticed was a slightly out of date... so updated that too!

Will submit the patches once I get a bug number... (that's really how
this is supposed to be done still?)


live well,
  vagrant
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 37 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.