GNU bug report logs -
#54368
[PATCH 0/4] Add Btrfs RAID10 install tests.
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sat, 19 Mar 2022 11:31:35 -0400
with message-id <87k0cq3qnc.fsf <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#54368: [PATCH 0/4] Add Btrfs RAID10 install tests.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #54368,
regarding [PATCH 0/4] Add Btrfs RAID10 install tests.
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
54368: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=54368
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hello Guix!
On the quest to get our Berlin CI machine rebooted on a Btrfs RAID10 array,
these new system tests validate that software-wise, it's supposed to work.
Thanks,
Maxim Cournoyer (4):
tests: install: Adjust the timeouts on two failing tests.
tests: install: Streamline 'qemu-command/writable-image'.
tests: install: Enable the use of multiple disk devices for tests.
tests: install: Add two new Btrfs RAID10 install test.
gnu/tests/base.scm | 6 +-
gnu/tests/install.scm | 382 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)
--
2.34.0
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hi Mathieu,
Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Hello Maxim,
>
> This looks great! I created a dedicated jobset here:
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/wip-btrfs-raid-tests to check everything
> is still running fine.
>
>> +OS to install TARGET-OS. Return the VM disk images of TARGET-SIZE bytes
>> +containing the installed system. Unless providing OS, the PACKAGES will be
>> +added to the packages defined in INSTALLATION-OS (from (gnu system install)).
>> +NUMBER-OF-DISKS can be used to specify a number of disks different than one,
>> +such as for RAID systems."
>
> I'm having troubles understanding the "Unless providing OS" part of the
> sentence, but that's also because this mechanism of adding packages to
> the default OS definition is tricky.
>
> Maybe we should augment the OS definition with those packages
> unconditionally in the body of the "run-install" procedure.
This is now done unconditionally. I've also fixed the typo reported in
another email on this thread, thank you!
Retested with 'make check-system TESTS=btrfs-raid10-root-os' and pushed
with commit b45a301618.
Thanks for the review!
Maxim
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 122 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.