From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 09 15:28:12 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2022 20:28:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60781 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nS2uq-00086u-CX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 15:28:12 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:52662) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nS2uo-00086m-OF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 15:28:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33606) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nS2uo-0006Mw-Id for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 15:28:10 -0500 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:36562) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nS2um-0007zs-8L for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 15:28:10 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA80C400BE; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 21:28:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with UTF8SMTP id yYJ_QkH9zzZb; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 21:28:04 +0100 (CET) From: Aurora DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1646857679; bh=il/MTU9JExaMpcDcHMPEuLzASn4Gz8nPKPw8xHtZxLg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date; b=YBhIihiAoSW15aHKROMxo34PgX0/S0LI9RkZp2RXlBUq+NMpr4p1qqRaLEjPYLnLL awU9aSNpM7CxixJHqH90p7dzCVL2hgX8qTkKW+OT2i1170fkOf4APEzgG7LOW5zfxB J8EQkTjNQqzW6Z+kaT8/52Tzhqd5fwxE84weS1Kz7e8oiF0idjFHCwC2wniXublf8G H7gioQ76NQ3TsKeTg7Z1vdRsFI36h8Tog+XEwHkCMS5rDHbpQ9X42nRfgIFJldpLYo Z7kQKdb2Q26N59xo4yRojEQjQj9lTQReWCb4G3izj/ukVksSMmGstZ5UuXqcRwF4EG m6Hs6k08Vb2Mw== To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH 00/10] Fix tests for a number of Fukamachi CL packages Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 20:27:39 +0000 Message-Id: <20220309202749.2196-1-rind38@disroot.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.21.23.139; envelope-from=rind38@disroot.org; helo=knopi.disroot.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Aurora X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) For a number of Fukamachi's packages, all that is required to get the tests working is to ensure the test package is loaded before the base package. All of these patches are technically independent of eachother, but the rationale (and method) for the fixes being the exact same for every single one, it felt more reasonable to group them together than keep repeating it. A few packages untouched by these patches remain unfixed as they seem to exhibit circular dependencies that I'm yet unsure how to fix. Aurora (10): gnu: Fix sbcl-proc-parse tests gnu: Fix sbcl-myway tests gnu: Fix sbcl-xsubseq tests gnu: Fix sbcl-smart-buffer tests gnu: Fix sbcl-fast-http tests gnu: Fix sbcl-http-body tests gnu: Fix sbcl-cl-cookie tests gnu: Fix sbcl-mito tests gnu: Fix sbcl-cl-locale tests gnu: Fix sbcl-assoc-utils tests gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm | 58 ++++++++++----------------------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) base-commit: 723ec40936617554097ab30ac3abbc3507ba9dad -- 2.30.2 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 09 18:16:41 2022 Received: (at 54312) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2022 23:16:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32822 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nS5Xt-0006bL-Ef for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 18:16:41 -0500 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:52510) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nS5Xr-0006bA-M4 for 54312@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 18:16:40 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043E1400AF for <54312@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:16:38 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wlL3K8p2RdIN for <54312@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:16:37 +0100 (CET) From: Aurora DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1646867796; bh=xLU7GoeyZ4sg71HfhxNOeEqwKPP1XlEdNo1npQLCt/4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=fnZmzzG5+bsNTdX16mCJvIUAOJWZbjC7G0udcbauN2b6B5ppZO6sZqnTj2UuLhEyC gsTrsB404z2YbC8yMaHDxIweCV0ZLmwZEXzEF4H6m1NDeuQHhYCON2sloRDToAppG5 PlH6CnZcojShuskdh/2a8zlGCQ+GME73mSJutAhdCKjxPKxOrTv/WboKn2hl2rTqv5 X3lK1V/9P3tD4NdwaWCCQYgc3nTzBJjHQaf3nfQVeWG7GjcHbBqTRu/0I8jufGFhdO ARfs/MW643+s5qKN2bmlcwYtgMAjiXKWAFDCDRKCYwApo4U6dahYahFOnMMdv1andD +6upfBJn0Oe6g== To: 54312@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: [PATCH 00/10] Fix tests for a number of Fukamachi CL packages) Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 23:16:33 +0000 Message-ID: <878rtiemy6.fsf@disp3269> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 54312 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Apologies regarding the multiple patches sent. I had misunderstood part of the email submission infrastructure and assumed that debbugs cared about the in-reply-to headers. I have been informed in irc that it *does not* and that a split sending procedure using the thread comments to submit the rest of the patches is necessary. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 10 01:57:55 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2022 06:57:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33042 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nSCkF-0004S3-B8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 01:57:55 -0500 Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:19214) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nSCkD-0004Rt-KE for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 01:57:54 -0500 Received: from lprikler-laptop.ist.intra (gw.ist.tugraz.at [129.27.202.101]) by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4KDfyc2Hzlz3xWr for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 07:57:44 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1646895464; bh=SLrNiIbniujID2txT45lz38cFX8tCSXOvonuH+VZBw4=; h=Subject:From:To:Date; b=kwD1HsDM3mUVz+rIIX5u3Rk0wtAdJpPZjTIXvgM5evB6CDycdiOUZOaTL5TInP6Lm Y3Mkg7polwAu+aQxA/8QELYC6zTLc90oSDK4hlme8mbvBUR0MUBLe3o0FDRwp2BmO9 n4kE/yzjatPhZ5R7yNHzgkMpMIWiMYRNh8YE2sFk= Message-ID: <111d686dcfe260872f177f5ce2d2bc9d5c063f28.camel@ist.tugraz.at> Subject: From: Liliana Marie Prikler To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 07:57:43 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUG-Backscatter-control: waObeELIUl4ypBWmcn/8wQ X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.117 X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: merge 54312 54313 54314 54315 54316 54317 54318 54319 54320 54321 54322 thanks Content analysis details: (1.4 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.27.2.202 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [129.27.2.202 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 SPF_NONE SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 1.7 BODY_EMPTY No body text in message X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) merge 54312 54313 54314 54315 54316 54317 54318 54319 54320 54321 54322 thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 10 09:48:05 2022 Received: (at 54312-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2022 14:48:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33607 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nSK5E-000504-Vb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 09:48:05 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:59377) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nSK5C-0004zX-A9 for 54312-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 09:48:03 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF5F3240028 for <54312-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 15:47:55 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1646923675; bh=b5R1RvC0nxsJ3Av3dkI7VZuyUkFnOcLdw79BigixBhQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=oT5PQk/d22AUivsQjxVWuro13CHqPavobeA08BK3fSKtdnbAIaBDNhL3hnJgr2/hS /LB7q4U64YOheyMTZ037eeF0N0WJcfjxb1jyHg1leka7uRvG6Og1EIJhHH1eb34RBg NgR1RcbBUd44pWf44paKU65bGyZSyXqkA80uGrjsQ4cs+bR2h+Mt9hodXYRDXWFiEi EWQ1SXEGxv5JvQYG+48jNZD83EvTkIay+YY3gjJjxI+E/YDIVyLti6EWrq7KLixD+P zAJA336mJfSu+ns1tIQ+m4eT3WhZeQzrMBpLY2LEjBhF2Niscby+DXT5FDtmTAS1ai j7Qs3l8axN3lQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4KDsP65YMlz9rwn; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 15:47:54 +0100 (CET) References: <20220309202749.2196-1-rind38@disroot.org> <878rtiemy6.fsf@disp3269> From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: Aurora Subject: Re: [bug#54312] [PATCH 00/10] Fix tests for a number of Fukamachi CL packages Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 14:46:23 +0000 In-reply-to: <878rtiemy6.fsf@disp3269> Message-ID: <877d91vp7q.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 54312-done Cc: 54312-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain I modified the commit messages to use our standard format, and pushed the patch series as bbd1d7f975039589668554e2ec7d5bead72c85b1 and following. Thanks. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCYioPmQ8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j+7twD+JDaCWsg7ig2ARiYqcOG6LwqS/OiF+L6yBJcM t/LvCn8BAKEEM8qpvoqNZBejATyhWPK+6BthGioGcNws95aXfnwV =2WD0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:03:48 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator