GNU bug report logs - #54311
[PATCH] gnu: tint2: Update to 17.0.2.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: "Wamm K. D" <jaft.r <at> outlook.com>

Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 20:01:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo, patch

Done: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #17 received at 54311 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jaft <jaft.r <at> outlook.com>
To: "54311 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <54311 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, 
 Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
Subject: Re: [bug#54311] [PATCH] gnu: tint2: Update to 17.0.2.
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 21:46:27 +0000 (UTC)
> On Wednesday, March 9, 2022, 02:30:14 PM CST, Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be> wrote: 
>
>
>
>
>
> Wamm K. D schreef op wo 09-03-2022 om 13:34 [-0600]:
>
> > +              (uri (string-append "https://gitlab.com/o9000/" name "/-/archive/"
> > +                                  version "/" name "-" version ".tar.gz"))
>
>
> Is this uri stable?

I think it's a standard GitLab URL? It's what was given when choosing to download the .tar.gz file from GitLab; I went with it to avoid a lot of changes to the original package definition but, given it's just Git, we could just use a git-download instead. Let me know if that's preferred.

> Also, there seems to be a 'v' missing before version.  Does
> "guix download
> https://gitlab.com/o9000/tint2/-/archive/17.0.2/tint2-17.0.2.tar.gz"
> succeed?

It does (I'm running version 17.0.2 on my machine, right now); the tint2 project tags versions with both no "v" and with a "v" so either would work. Both "https://gitlab.com/o9000/tint2/-/archive/17.0.2/tint2-17.0.2.tar.gz" and "https://gitlab.com/o9000/tint2/-/archive/v17.0.2/tint2-v17.0.2.tar.gz" should be valid (https://gitlab.com/o9000/tint2/-/tags).




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 290 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.