GNU bug report logs - #54299
[PATCH 01/27] added alacritty 0.10.1

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Till Robin Zickel <trzickel <at> illegalaliensfrom.space>

Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 17:20:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #134 received at 54299 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: Till Robin Zickel <trzickel <at> illegalaliensfrom.space>, 
 54299 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#54299] [PATCH 12/27] added development inputs, reformatted
 rust-nix <at> 0.22
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 19:04:38 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Till Robin Zickel schreef op di 08-03-2022 om 18:31 [+0100]:
> -       (("rust-bitflags" ,rust-bitflags-1.2)
> -        ("rust-cc" ,rust-cc-1)
> +       (("rust-bitflags" ,rust-bitflags-1.2) ("rust-cc" ,rust-cc-1)

That doesn't look better formatting to me.

>          ("rust-cfg-if" ,rust-cfg-if-1)
>          ("rust-libc" ,rust-libc-0.2)
> -        ("rust-memoffset" ,rust-memoffset-0.6))))))
> +        ("rust-memoffset" ,rust-memoffset-0.6))


> +       #:cargo-development-inputs
> +       (("rust-assert-impl" ,rust-assert-impl-0.1) ("rust-caps" ,rust-caps-0.5)
> +        ("rust-lazy-static" ,rust-lazy-static-1)
> +        ("rust-rand" ,rust-rand-0.8)
> +        ("rust-semver" ,rust-semver-1)
> +        ("rust-sysctl" ,rust-sysctl-0.1)
> +        ("rust-tempfile" ,rust-tempfile-3))))))

Why do these need to be added?  Did "guix build rust-nix <at> 0.22" fail
before these changes?

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 48 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.