GNU bug report logs -
#54296
Add buffer-matching functionality
Previous Next
Reported by: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 22:34:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
On 15.06.2022 20:29, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 19:51:42 +0300
>> Cc: 54296 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, philipk <at> posteo.net, larsi <at> gnus.org
>> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
>>
>> On 15.06.2022 19:17, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> Did you see that "was" part in what I wrote above? I was only
>>> describing what I meant to say back then, that's all.
>>
>> Because your opinion made it into reality.
>
> Sorry about that, but it was a misunderstanding of my opinion.
>
>> Are you going to be fine with me changing 'buffer-match-p' to match the
>> older contract of 'project-kill-buffer-conditions', with both
>> 'major-mode' and 'derived-mode' matchers included?
>
> I don't think I understand what you are suggesting. What is that
> "older contract"?
The value format that 'project-kill-buffer-conditions' supported before
the recent change. You can look at its docstring and definition inside
Emacs 28.1, for instance.
> Can you show a patch?
Please look at the patch attached to the very first message in this bug
report.
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=54296;msg=5;filename=0001-Generalise-buffer-matching-from-project.el.patch
The function name has changed after discussion, but the docstring is
still relevant, and it mirrors 'project-kill-buffer-conditions'.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 338 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.