GNU bug report logs -
#54289
29.0.50; Emacs ignores xmodmap Super_L assignment
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
On Tue, 08 Mar 2022 18:10:45 +0800 Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com> wrote:
> Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net> writes:
>
>> AFAIK Xfce4 uses Gtk3, and e.g. xfce4-terminal and thunar (file manager)
>> recognize my Super_L mapping to `/'. LibreOffice does too. The only
>> other program I use that ignores Super_L is Firefox, but it has since
>> long before this Emacs problem started (with your commit 15910e5d
>> according to git bisect); I've search the web about this Firefox issue
>> but haven't found anything.
>
> Interesting, but please see below.
>
>> Of these, Emacs fails to recognize only the Super_L mapping, since the
>> above-mentioned commit. (As an experiment I added `remove Super_L =
>> Mod4' before the Super_L = slash mapping, logged out and back in, but
>> the result was that none of the .Xmodmap mappings were recognized, not
>> just in Emacs but also e.g. in xfce4-terminal. So I removed that line
>> to restore the status quo ante.)
>
> Can you show the output of running just `xmodmap' without any arguments?
xmodmap: up to 4 keys per modifier, (keycodes in parentheses):
shift Shift_L (0x32), Shift_R (0x3e)
lock
control Control_L (0x25), Control_L (0x42), Control_R (0x69)
mod1 Alt_L (0x40), Meta_L (0xcd)
mod2 Num_Lock (0x4d)
mod3
mod4 slash (0x85), Super_R (0x86), slash (0xce), Hyper_L (0xcf)
mod5 ISO_Level3_Shift (0x5c), Mode_switch (0xcb)
> I suspect that some modifier is mapped to Super_L, alongside slash.
Is the above output consistent with the five mappings in my .Xmodmap
file?
> That is incorrect, so Emacs and Firefox are within their rights to
> ignore such a mapping.
If so, how do I get the mapping of Super_L to slash back (at least in
Emacs)?
Steve Berman
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 102 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.