Subject: Re: bug#54175: 27.2; Info-follow-reference completions in reverse order

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 18:49:40 +0200

> From: Howard Melman <[email-masked]>
> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 10:43:49 -0500
> 
> 2. It's not unreasonable to expect a completion table to be in a meaningful 
> order when there is one.

But what is a meaningful order in this particular case, why is it
more meaningful than the current order?