GNU bug report logs -
#54117
28.0.91; Upgrading packages not working
Previous Next
Reported by: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 02:14:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 28.0.91
Done: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 54117 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 54117 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54117
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 23 Feb 2022 02:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Wed, 23 Feb 2022 02:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Install some packages from NonGNU ELPA and wait for newer versions to
become available. Then, type U in the package list. Those packages
will not be marked for upgrades. (I hope I'm not doing anything wrong
here.)
Thanks.
In GNU Emacs 28.0.91 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, cairo version 1.17.4, Xaw3d scroll bars)
of 2022-02-08 built on trinity
Repository revision: 82e74e4559b8becd44f3e7ac0134e2baddd69921
Repository branch: emacs-28
Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12014000
System Description: Fedora Linux 35 (Workstation Edition)
Configured using:
'configure --with-x-toolkit=lucid --with-native-compilation
--cache-file=/tmp/ccache'
Configured features:
ACL CAIRO DBUS FREETYPE GIF GLIB GMP GNUTLS GSETTINGS HARFBUZZ JPEG JSON
LCMS2 LIBSELINUX LIBSYSTEMD LIBXML2 MODULES NATIVE_COMP NOTIFY INOTIFY
PDUMPER PNG RSVG SECCOMP SOUND THREADS TIFF TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS X11
XAW3D XDBE XIM XPM LUCID ZLIB
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54117
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 23 Feb 2022 10:33:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 54117 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com> writes:
> Install some packages from NonGNU ELPA and wait for newer versions to
> become available. Then, type U in the package list. Those packages
> will not be marked for upgrades. (I hope I'm not doing anything wrong
> here.)
I tried `U' in the package list and it said
---
Packages marked for upgrading: 18
---
So it seems like it's working for me. (I tried this in Emacs 29,
though.)
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54117
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 23 Feb 2022 10:46:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 54117 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
> Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com> writes:
>
>> Install some packages from NonGNU ELPA and wait for newer versions to
>> become available. Then, type U in the package list. Those packages
>> will not be marked for upgrades. (I hope I'm not doing anything wrong
>> here.)
>
> I tried `U' in the package list and it said
>
> ---
> Packages marked for upgrading: 18
> ---
>
> So it seems like it's working for me.
Hmm, which packages? I have geiser stuck on 0.22 (while 0.22.2 shows up
in the package list), to name one example.
Thanks.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54117
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 23 Feb 2022 10:55:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 54117 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com> writes:
> Hmm, which packages? I have geiser stuck on 0.22 (while 0.22.2 shows up
> in the package list), to name one example.
Here's the list of packages it says are upgradable for me:
18 matches for "^I" in buffer: *Packages*
69:I ada-mode 7.2.0 available gnu major-mode for editing Ada sources
240:I auto-dim-other-buffers 20220209.2101 available melpa Makes windows without focus less prominent
1449:I esxml 20211122.1657 available melpa Library for working with xml via esxml and sxml
2778:I js2-mode 20211229.135 available melpa Improved JavaScript editing mode
3123:I magit-section 20220222.1354 available melpa Sections for read-only buffers
3486:I nov 20220218.1230 available melpa Featureful EPUB reader mode
3933:I paredit 20191121.2328 available melpa minor mode for editing parentheses
3984:I pdf-tools 20220214.344 available melpa Support library for PDF documents
4028:I php-mode 20220120.1959 available melpa Major mode for editing PHP code
4136:I powerline 20220122.1904 available melpa Rewrite of Powerline
4868:I subed 1.0.3 available nongnu A major mode for editing subtitles
4903:I swift-mode 20211031.543 available melpa Major-mode for Apple's Swift programming language
4948:I tablist 20200427.2205 available melpa Extended tabulated-list-mode
5170:I uni-confusables 0.3 available gnu Unicode confusables table
5354:I wgrep 20210322.2207 available melpa Writable grep buffer and apply the changes to files
5361:I which-key 20220214.1818 available melpa Display available keybindings in popup
5395:I wisi 3.1.7 available gnu Utilities for implementing an indentation/navigation engine using a generalized LALR parser
5399:I with-editor 20220211.2034 available melpa Use the Emacsclient as $EDITOR
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54117
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 23 Feb 2022 11:01:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 54117 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
> Here's the list of packages it says are upgradable for me:
>
> 18 matches for "^I" in buffer: *Packages*
> 69:I ada-mode 7.2.0 available gnu major-mode for editing Ada sources
> 240:I auto-dim-other-buffers 20220209.2101 available melpa Makes windows without focus less prominent
> 1449:I esxml 20211122.1657 available melpa Library for working with xml via esxml and sxml
> 2778:I js2-mode 20211229.135 available melpa Improved JavaScript editing mode
> 3123:I magit-section 20220222.1354 available melpa Sections for read-only buffers
> 3486:I nov 20220218.1230 available melpa Featureful EPUB reader mode
> 3933:I paredit 20191121.2328 available melpa minor mode for editing parentheses
> 3984:I pdf-tools 20220214.344 available melpa Support library for PDF documents
> 4028:I php-mode 20220120.1959 available melpa Major mode for editing PHP code
> 4136:I powerline 20220122.1904 available melpa Rewrite of Powerline
> 4868:I subed 1.0.3 available nongnu A major mode for editing subtitles
> 4903:I swift-mode 20211031.543 available melpa Major-mode for Apple's Swift programming language
> 4948:I tablist 20200427.2205 available melpa Extended tabulated-list-mode
> 5170:I uni-confusables 0.3 available gnu Unicode confusables table
> 5354:I wgrep 20210322.2207 available melpa Writable grep buffer and apply the changes to files
> 5361:I which-key 20220214.1818 available melpa Display available keybindings in popup
> 5395:I wisi 3.1.7 available gnu Utilities for implementing an indentation/navigation engine using a generalized LALR parser
> 5399:I with-editor 20220211.2034 available melpa Use the Emacsclient as $EDITOR
Hmm, thanks. For me, at least the following packages that should be
upgradable aren't marked for upgrades on my side: ivy-posframe,
posframe, pyim, geiser, and coterm.
In fact, nothing gets marked for upgrades, and I have got quite some
more packages installed, so I suspect some problem in the upgrade
marking process.
(BTW, I don't have MELPA enabled if that's relevant.)
Reply sent
to
Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Wed, 13 Apr 2022 07:20:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Wed, 13 Apr 2022 07:20:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #22 received at 54117-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com> writes:
> In fact, nothing gets marked for upgrades, and I have got quite some
> more packages installed, so I suspect some problem in the upgrade
> marking process.
I got around to looking at this: every package installed is labeled as
"external" instead of "installed". Since I don't know what the
difference between the two is, I installed a change to also mark
upgradable "external" packages, and am closing this bug.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54117
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 13 Apr 2022 15:14:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #25 received at 54117 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com> writes:
>
> > In fact, nothing gets marked for upgrades, and I have got quite some
> > more packages installed, so I suspect some problem in the upgrade
> > marking process.
>
> I got around to looking at this: every package installed is labeled as
> "external" instead of "installed". Since I don't know what the
> difference between the two is, I installed a change to also mark
> upgradable "external" packages, and am closing this bug.
>
Did this change go to the release branch (for the future 28.2) or to
the trunk or both?
Thanks!
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54117
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 13 Apr 2022 15:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54117
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 14 Apr 2022 00:48:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #31 received at 54117 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Corwin Brust <corwin <at> bru.st> writes:
>> Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com> writes:
>>
>> > In fact, nothing gets marked for upgrades, and I have got quite some
>> > more packages installed, so I suspect some problem in the upgrade
>> > marking process.
>>
>> I got around to looking at this: every package installed is labeled as
>> "external" instead of "installed". Since I don't know what the
>> difference between the two is, I installed a change to also mark
>> upgradable "external" packages, and am closing this bug.
>>
>
> Did this change go to the release branch (for the future 28.2) or to
> the trunk or both?
Just to master. It didn't seem safe enough for the release branch,
since it isn't a regression in 28.1.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54117
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 14 Apr 2022 00:48:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54117
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 14 Apr 2022 14:21:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #37 received at 54117 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 7:47 PM Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Did this change go to the release branch (for the future 28.2) or to
> > the trunk or both?
>
> Just to master. It didn't seem safe enough for the release branch,
> since it isn't a regression in 28.1.
Gotcha. I was asking because the bug report was filed against 28.x. I
wasn't sure if that implied a fix for 28.2 or not.
Thank you for the reply.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54117
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 25 Apr 2022 11:34:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #40 received at 54117 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 13.04.2022 10:19, Po Lu via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army
knife of text editors wrote:
> I got around to looking at this: every package installed is labeled as
> "external" instead of "installed". Since I don't know what the
> difference between the two is
;; Not inside `package-user-dir'.
((not (file-in-directory-p dir package-user-dir)) "external")
Perhaps you customize package-user-dir and its value is applied later
than package-initialize is called? Or something similar.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 24 May 2022 11:24:06 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 23 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.