Subject: bug#54079: 29.0.50; Method dispatching eratically fails

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2022 20:19:43 +0200

> Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2022 16:37:16 +0000
> From: Alan Mackenzie <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
> 
>    CHECK_SYMBOL (symbol);
> +  /* If we're in a byte compilation, ensure the definition's symbols
> +     are stripped of their positions. */
> +  if (symbols_with_pos_enabled
> +      && SYMBOL_WITH_POS_P (symbol)
> +      && Ffboundp (Qbyte_run_strip_symbol_positions))
> +    call1 (Qbyte_run_strip_symbol_positions, definition);

The first two conditions should be in reverse order, for speedier
code, shouldn't they?