GNU bug report logs - #54069
[PATCH 0/2] gnu: pciutils: Unbundle pci.ids and use latest.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Brendan Tildesley <mail <at> brendan.scot>
Cc: 54069 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#54069] [PATCH 0/2] gnu: pciutils: Unbundle pci.ids and use latest.
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2022 00:00:57 -0500

Hi Brendan,

Brendan Tildesley <mail <at> brendan.scot> writes:

>> On 02/24/2022 4:32 AM Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>> ...
>> 
>> A Makefile is provided and has an install target; we should use it.  It
>> installs the following files:
>> 
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> IDFILES = pci.ids usb.ids oui.txt iab.txt pnp.ids
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>> 
> Note that it doesn't gzip them, and oui.txt is 8.4MB. Dependencies only tend
> to need one or two of these files, lke usb.ids or pci.ids. Also the hwdata project
> only updates these every couple months. We could define a package for each individual
> file, then if for some reason all are needed in a directory, a "hwdata" union package
>  could be created.

Unless there's a good reason to split the package (which could be
multiple outputs instead of multiple packages), I'd leave it the way
upstream intended it; and there's no better place for inspiration than
[0] for that, as the Fedora package maintainer happens to also be the
maintainer of hwdata :-).

[0]  https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hwdata/blob/rawhide/f/hwdata.spec

*If* we want to have our pciutils package use the hwdata pci.ids, we can
avoid depending on the bigger 'hwdata' package by copying hwdata's
pci.ids over its own, and then build as usual.

Does that make sense?

Thank you for looking into it!

Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.