GNU bug report logs -
#54055
texlive-bin fails to build on armhf-linux, breaking guix pull
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 54055 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 54055 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54055
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 18 Feb 2022 12:37:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Fri, 18 Feb 2022 12:37:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Something I've noticed from data.guix.gnu.org, it fails to compute the
guix derivation for armhf-linux because texlive-bin fails to build [1]
1: https://data.guix.gnu.org/job/28674
phase `check' failed after 820.9 seconds
command "make" "check" "-j" "8" failed with status 2
builder for `/gnu/store/hq3r8ayp8ak2p36y016x62f028m4miv1-texlive-bin-20210325.drv' failed with exit code 1
@ build-failed /gnu/store/hq3r8ayp8ak2p36y016x62f028m4miv1-texlive-bin-20210325.drv - 1 builder for `/gnu/store/hq3r8ayp8ak2p36y016x62f028m4miv1-texlive-bin-20210325.drv' failed with exit code 1
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/gd3xkfbpfcv03y958ggmgnc150cz4r82-texlive-amsmath-59745.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
error: while computing manifest entry derivation for armhf-linux
error %exception: (#<&message message: "You found a bug: the program '/gnu/store/s82qcdcxsyr16fp1db8n800jd171vk4v-compute-guix-derivation'\nfailed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: \"e9f9f291edafaa27fa6d7e9967909555a08d383e\"; system: \"armhf-linux\";\nhost version: \"1.3.0-21.e427593\"; pull-version: 1).\nPlease report the COMPLETE output above by email to <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>.\n">)
I've included what looks like the failure at the bottom of the email. I
did find a thread [2] which suggested this is a real upstream issue on
armhf-linux.
2: https://tug.org/pipermail/tlbuild/2021q1/004873.html
FAIL: tests/mendex
==================
#!/gnu/store/97xwzdsw9p6019dbml5mzf781c7avfkq-bash-minimal-5.1.8/bin/sh -vx
# $Id: mendex.test 58575 2021-03-21 08:54:52Z takuji $
# Copyright 2017 Karl Berry <tex-live <at> tug.org>
# Copyright 2013 Peter Breitenlohner <tex-live <at> tug.org>
# You may freely use, modify and/or distribute this file.
TEXMFCNF=$srcdir/../kpathsea
+ TEXMFCNF=../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/../kpathsea
export TEXMFCNF
+ export TEXMFCNF
rm -f foo.*
+ rm -f 'foo.*'
./mendex $srcdir/tests/foo.idx -o foo.ind1 -t foo.ilg1 \
&& diff $srcdir/tests/foo.ind foo.ind1 || exit 1
+ ./mendex ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/foo.idx -o foo.ind1 -t foo.ilg1
This is mendex version 3.3 [21-Mar-2021] (utf8.uptex) (TeX Live 2021).
Scanning input file ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/foo.idx....done (3 entries accepted, 0 rejected).
3 entries accepted, 0 rejected.
Sorting index....done(0 comparisons).
Sorting pages....done(4 comparisons).
Making index file....done.
0 warnings, written in foo.ilg1.
Output written in foo.ind1.
+ diff ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/foo.ind foo.ind1
cat $srcdir/tests/foo.idx | ./mendex >foo.ind2 2>foo.ilg2 \
&& diff $srcdir/tests/foo.ind foo.ind2 || exit 1
+ cat ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/foo.idx
+ ./mendex
+ diff ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/foo.ind foo.ind2
./mendex -U -d $srcdir/tests/uni.dict -s $srcdir/tests/uni.ist \
$srcdir/tests/uni.idx -o uni.ind1 -t uni.ilg1 \
&& diff $srcdir/tests/uni.ind uni.ind1 || exit 1
+ ./mendex -U -d ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/uni.dict -s ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/uni.ist ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/uni.idx -o uni.ind1 -t uni.ilg1
This is mendex version 3.3 [21-Mar-2021] (utf8.uptex) (TeX Live 2021).
Scanning dictionary file ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/uni.dict....done.
Scanning input file ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/uni.idx....done (8 entries accepted, 0 rejected).
8 entries accepted, 0 rejected.
Sorting index....done(24 comparisons).
Sorting pages....done(0 comparisons).
Making index file....done.
0 warnings, written in uni.ilg1.
Output written in uni.ind1.
+ diff ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/uni.ind uni.ind1
cat $srcdir/tests/uni.idx | \
./mendex -U -d $srcdir/tests/uni.dict -s $srcdir/tests/uni.ist \
>uni.ind2 2>uni.ilg2 \
&& diff $srcdir/tests/uni.ind uni.ind2 || exit 1
+ cat ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/uni.idx
+ ./mendex -U -d ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/uni.dict -s ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/uni.ist
+ diff ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/uni.ind uni.ind2
# test for page_precedence
./mendex -s $srcdir/tests/pprec0.ist $srcdir/tests/pprecA.idx -o pprecA-0.ind1 -t pprecA-0.ilg \
&& diff $srcdir/tests/pprecA-0.ind pprecA-0.ind1 || exit 1
+ ./mendex -s ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/pprec0.ist ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/pprecA.idx -o pprecA-0.ind1 -t pprecA-0.ilg
This is mendex version 3.3 [21-Mar-2021] (utf8.uptex) (TeX Live 2021).
Scanning input file ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/pprecA.idx....done (9 entries accepted, 0 rejected).
9 entries accepted, 0 rejected.
Sorting index....done(0 comparisons).
Sorting pages....done(27 comparisons).
Making index file....done.
0 warnings, written in pprecA-0.ilg.
Output written in pprecA-0.ind1.
+ diff ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/pprecA-0.ind pprecA-0.ind1
3c3
< \item entryA[[delim0]]i[[sfx 3p]], 1[[sfx 3p]], I[[sfx 3p]]
---
> \item entryA[[delim0]]i, ii, iii, 1, 2, 3, I, II, III
+ exit 1
FAIL tests/mendex.test (exit status: 1)
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54055
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 18 Feb 2022 13:29:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 54055 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> writes:
> Something I've noticed from data.guix.gnu.org, it fails to compute the
> guix derivation for armhf-linux because texlive-bin fails to build [1]
>
> 1: https://data.guix.gnu.org/job/28674
> phase `check' failed after 820.9 seconds
> command "make" "check" "-j" "8" failed with status 2
> builder for `/gnu/store/hq3r8ayp8ak2p36y016x62f028m4miv1-texlive-bin-20210325.drv' failed with exit code 1
> @ build-failed
> /gnu/store/hq3r8ayp8ak2p36y016x62f028m4miv1-texlive-bin-20210325.drv -
> 1 builder for
> `/gnu/store/hq3r8ayp8ak2p36y016x62f028m4miv1-texlive-bin-20210325.drv'
> failed with exit code 1
> cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/gd3xkfbpfcv03y958ggmgnc150cz4r82-texlive-amsmath-59745.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
> error: while computing manifest entry derivation for armhf-linux
> error %exception: (#<&message message: "You found a bug: the program
> '/gnu/store/s82qcdcxsyr16fp1db8n800jd171vk4v-compute-guix-derivation'\nfailed
> to compute the derivation for Guix (version:
> \"e9f9f291edafaa27fa6d7e9967909555a08d383e\"; system:
> \"armhf-linux\";\nhost version: \"1.3.0-21.e427593\"; pull-version:
> 1).\nPlease report the COMPLETE output above by email to
> <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>.\n">)
I forgot an important link, here's a texlive-bin derivation on
data.guix.gnu.org, which links to some logs for failed builds [1]. I'm
not quite sure why the derivation here doesn't match up with the
derivation shown in the log above.
1: https://data.guix.gnu.org/gnu/store/vr6q02wyzjkbk35fkqcqi653csza22mw-texlive-bin-20210325.drv
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
Request was from
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 02 Mar 2022 10:33:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Added indication that bug 54055 blocks53214
Request was from
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 02 Mar 2022 10:40:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Reply sent
to
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Wed, 02 Mar 2022 18:32:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Wed, 02 Mar 2022 18:32:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 54055-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> skribis:
> Something I've noticed from data.guix.gnu.org, it fails to compute the
> guix derivation for armhf-linux because texlive-bin fails to build [1]
[...]
> + diff ../../../texlive-20210325-source/texk/mendexk/tests/pprecA-0.ind pprecA-0.ind1
> 3c3
> < \item entryA[[delim0]]i[[sfx 3p]], 1[[sfx 3p]], I[[sfx 3p]]
> ---
>> \item entryA[[delim0]]i, ii, iii, 1, 2, 3, I, II, III
> + exit 1
> FAIL tests/mendex.test (exit status: 1)
Fixed in ca6de276db0de1a4b7fdd29dbfea401937f50ff7 by skipping the two
offending tests.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 31 Mar 2022 11:24:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 139 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.