GNU bug report logs - #54027
Wishlist: Support full CSI u specification for terminal input

Previous Next

Full log

Message #35 received at 54027 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: alexhutcheson <at> google.com, 54027 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#54027: Wishlist: Support full CSI u specification for
 terminal input
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 14:17:45 +0200

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  54027 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 22:49:58 -0500
> 
> Alex Hutcheson [2022-02-27 13:21:20] wrote:
> >> I think just adding the missing combinations is a better way forward.
> > I think we're in agreement here, I was just suggesting how to add
> > the combinations to xterm.el without introducing a lot of boilerplate
> > code.
> 
> Actually, for `ESC [ 27 ...` the better option is to bind `ESC [ 27` to
> a function that reads the subsequent parameters so it will handle *all*
> cases in one go, as in the barely tested patch below.
> 
> For `ESC [ ... u` it's a bit more tricky because it doesn't have such
> a "clean" prefix (it's distinguished by the final `u` instead), so we'd
> have to rework a lot of the rest of the `ESC [` bindings.
> Maybe not a bad idea, tho.

Thanks, but what is your opinion about which of the combinations we
need to add?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.