GNU bug report logs - #54000
[PATCH 0/2] Not showing upgraded/added packages in 'guix pull'

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Subject: bug#54000: closed (Re: bug#54000: [PATCH 0/2] Not showing
 upgraded/added packages in 'guix pull')
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 22:16:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#54000: [PATCH 0/2] Not showing upgraded/added packages in 'guix pull'

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 54000 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
54000: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=54000
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> ist.tugraz.at>
Cc: 54000-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#54000: [PATCH 0/2] Not showing upgraded/added packages in
 'guix pull'
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 23:15:27 +0100

Hi,

Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> ist.tugraz.at> skribis:

> Am Freitag, dem 18.02.2022 um 10:08 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> Hey comrades, hold your horses!  :-)
>> 
>> Since there’s a need for this, we can make ‘--details’ print package
>> lists when combined with ‘--news’; it doesn’t cost us anything,
>> that’s OK.
> Regarding the issue simon raised w.r.t. --details implying -l, I think
> --details should only imply listing the latest generation if -l is not
> specified.  That way --news --details would (hopefully) work as I
> intended, and specifying one without the other would only print that
> part.

Right, I went with something like you describe:

  2ddfb7b99b pull: No longer print upgraded/added packages upon completion.
  bc8bea1739 pull: '--news' no longer shows package lists.

That is, one can run ‘guix pull -N --details’ and get what you asked
for.  Running ‘guix pull --details’ alone still implies ‘-l’.

Let me know if anything’s amiss.

> On a separate note, would/should guix describe be affected by this? 
> Its output appear currently the same as `guix pull -l
> $CURRENT_GENERATION', but I haven't tested this on a generation
> including news.  My guess would be "no" as guix describe currently
> doesn't accept --news.

No, ‘guix describe’ doesn’t display news, profile changes, and all
that.  It’s meant to just show the raw channel info.

Thanks to both of you for your feedback!

Ludo’.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Not showing upgraded/added packages in 'guix pull'
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:38:38 +0100

Hello!

As a followup to <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53909>, these patches
remove the list of added/upgraded packages from the output of
‘guix pull’ (upon completion) and ‘guix pull --news’.

It’s not spring yet in this hemisphere, but it looks like a spring cleanup!

Ludo’.

Ludovic Courtès (2):
  pull: '--news' no longer shows package lists.
  pull: No longer print upgraded/added packages upon completion.

 doc/guix.texi         | 10 ++---
 guix/scripts/pull.scm | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)


base-commit: 41000d16c5c1586482a76d856c3152a6b8fcce8a
-- 
2.34.0

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.