From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 13 18:45:26 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2022 23:45:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39141 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nJOYX-0008DN-Qa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 18:45:26 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:32890) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nJLKy-0000s2-CY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 15:19:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54962) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJLKx-0005LX-Il for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 15:19:12 -0500 Received: from [2a00:1450:4864:20::52f] (port=41867 helo=mail-ed1-x52f.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJLKw-0007lL-4P for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 15:19:11 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id w2so5583562edc.8 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 12:19:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=z4OHbWmKrX2dQwqGT78yAeDLiSUJho19muFLqVBLNt4=; b=lpI/A8DapXtCeci9DBPOOtJiDVTTdviOUTJIk2vNeOfJS8PrTRMhtxHvYzpctHIzx9 0KmzKqwS7kvDva5WisAizJAYhuJmS6c6w2tkMjI8rju88zo1eBQbV7a9e5A/UX7EibmL BGwGODQinNEDM6FfrIvNl7GkyH5edlU8SHGPDymhErplKpk9ypp5Y8w3jTflKyvHMFre opf/VOXYIGNibzhWsGoOhMq7sdkw+ShXUxOOnjHh92FyDY6t8H1sDdVTRCgLJnAHQxgV YJzwTafskKfarlsJ0cy4MBmygDnHw81S9g6aNFwiVQVFVNnWlyn79baXGTgrAiN8nHyp n7fA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=z4OHbWmKrX2dQwqGT78yAeDLiSUJho19muFLqVBLNt4=; b=GtA7sSI+lbk5D7m1EdeZu6VeE8Z++rxvbOrulkTwoZ9rKdHel2RTEaQ1K9wjlDJe1K pMzdVdL0Iy51zElbzQSY5IEgH28OMfURA41jW5BNdSMdTeCTMFnEVr3mwDZyd8Cl2fEL 1cZrw71BkbbKcGjwW7BHeS5pFb4eOMx93oD6ox/ofKkhPoMxdkbtfDuiaC57bj73UpRU 2wUWq2j8zvhKqF89R181DVGOo+odi8hrFdRD+2nl+aeBGElwKSty6XXk3nuDzFkmDJvb x8r8Ol5+YaXjE4ceTAQ3TLyauKdKu8j35wu/KgoCQLdt0nWVgH4iEQcg6aJMFCnv+o5B kKBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532snb5wZYE7Un4Ze8l4LA+tr2SeIXDMsAFhBIwLJUJvw6eZCpYJ zzVQao+dBdyU03IU6k8kHyRAKkXWyGg0iyr+h9iIH5WfcwwDCg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwUg8WwMOhLdkwsU8i9Hkbap/CB89NAy7/A1vxsSdQ18Cnxhz+VVCj4zExwKU+60YtO0taL2A0A7PDlpaxrspg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:4256:: with SMTP id g22mr12295069edb.78.1644783546986; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 12:19:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane_Archer?= Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 21:18:55 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: date (GNU coreutils) 8.30 bug report "17 april 2022 + 37 week 5pm" To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000cf66a05d7ec03c1" X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:1450:4864:20::52f (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::52f; envelope-from=archerstephane@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x52f.google.com X-Spam_score_int: 22 X-Spam_score: 2.2 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam_report: (2.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.785, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 18:45:24 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --0000000000000cf66a05d7ec03c1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, I hope this is the right place to do my bug report. please see the following shell input-output: ``` $ date -d "17 april 2022 + 36 week 5pm" +'%G-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.0Z' 2022-12-25T17:00:00.0Z $ date -d "17 april 2022 + 37 week 5pm" +'%G-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.0Z' 2022-01-01T17:00:00.0Z $ date -d "17 april 2022 + 38 week 5pm" +'%G-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.0Z' 2023-01-08T17:00:00.0Z ``` as you can see the input "17 april 2022 + 37 week 5pm" makes date return the wrong output for some unknown reason. Do I do something wrong? I use the following version: date (GNU coreutils) 8.30 -- Best Regards, Stephane Archer --0000000000000cf66a05d7ec03c1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I hope this is the right place to do my= bug report.
please see the following shell input-output:
```
$ date -d "17 april 2022 + 36 week 5pm" +'%G= -%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.0Z'
2022-12-25T17:00:00.0Z
$ date -d "17 apr= il 2022 + 37 week 5pm" +'%G-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.0Z'
2022-01-01T1= 7:00:00.0Z
$ date -d "17 april 2022 + 38 week 5pm" +'%G-%m= -%dT%H:%M:%S.0Z'
2023-01-08T17:00:00.0Z
```
= as you can see the input=20 "17 april 2022 + 37 week 5pm" makes date return the wrong output = for some unknown reason.

Do I do something wrong?<= /div>
I use the following version: date (GNU coreutils) 8.30
=
--
Best Regards,

=
Stephane Archer
--0000000000000cf66a05d7ec03c1-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 14 03:17:57 2022 Received: (at 53982) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2022 08:17:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39655 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nJWYW-0004Pu-O3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 03:17:56 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:52917) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nJWYU-0004Pk-Hu for 53982@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 03:17:55 -0500 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jxxt91TQLz1r5SQ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:17:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jxxt870R2z1qqkC; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:17:52 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c_plxNm66xhc; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:17:52 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: KJFkkJU3b4hWqKAYh5tdpVD5uRzzKsWwhPL2qrWZ5lEmJXO9qG+3DOf95WBKuKQd Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-178-131.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.178.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:17:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A261C2C3837; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:17:51 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: =?utf-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane?= Archer Subject: Re: bug#53982: date (GNU coreutils) 8.30 bug report "17 april 2022 + 37 week 5pm" References: X-Yow: Yow!! It's LIBERACE and TUESDAY WELD!! High on a HILL... driving a LITTLE CAR... I wanna be in that LITTLE CAR, too!! I wanna drive off with LIBBY and TUESDAY! Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:17:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22St=C3=A9phane?= Archer"'s message of "Sun, 13 Feb 2022 21:18:55 +0100") Message-ID: <87czjpx3o0.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53982 Cc: 53982@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) On Feb 13 2022, Stéphane Archer wrote: > $ date -d "17 april 2022 + 36 week 5pm" +'%G-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.0Z' > 2022-12-25T17:00:00.0Z > $ date -d "17 april 2022 + 37 week 5pm" +'%G-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.0Z' > 2022-01-01T17:00:00.0Z > $ date -d "17 april 2022 + 38 week 5pm" +'%G-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.0Z' > 2023-01-08T17:00:00.0Z > ``` > as you can see the input "17 april 2022 + 37 week 5pm" makes date return > the wrong output for some unknown reason. It doesn't make sense to use %G without %V, or to use it in place of %Y. $ date -d "17 april 2022 + 37 week 5pm" +'%G/%V %Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.0Z' 2022/52 2023-01-01T17:00:00.0Z -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different." From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 14 04:42:05 2022 Received: (at 53982) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2022 09:42:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39785 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nJXrx-0006gk-FU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 04:42:05 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:46775) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nJXrv-0006gG-R5 for 53982@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 04:42:04 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-f41.google.com with SMTP id e7so32033094ejn.13 for <53982@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 01:42:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TMd4t+zyuvHsxA6i4qiGkJcF/BDnl/k16db3XA50cJc=; b=PGnb05prRxZxi+OVnlWxkVNvr2xfjiaKcFS1Kgmg89kZGVN4YHxbZFzSEVUDOtaK1C B9WqWHZsdwlWz7PiK7I2pxj+CsVnGEOQ1+DrDcDuRW4KbGGvvzuBGOVLvyiYpwiPxaJw m6OJ/eWwBj5uNH2JC6obXqXnIDCmnUlAL9r9wUR5tdv9RF9M1KtuxLUY3lobV9E/Esyr qB7bHEPIX8ZuLymgARJHfXsa+E8EyjsVLGr9CfwcDC7miu10h6YcJmJTSfP6AsU1NP5k w2yx9ksFfJ9lDJFkneLtsiewI1sZgbzH+l3Alu6F7Rz8V0FUTwTNLgYjWoYX0ZG8xb/G A4WQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TMd4t+zyuvHsxA6i4qiGkJcF/BDnl/k16db3XA50cJc=; b=Ydhtt6RQH5o6ZQ9xxoyqjMGJrAm5G16wCtdh3tCZhzjWpuqxPphVNN34vkE3R9gl5e GbgAKR1XnJi6DhA7DFRZTZN6muWKirebaSSPJgY+EeBEXn3qI81Qtqhi7gHYdR6p1PF6 C3+Cz/sULg79tQ43UJ4Y7LN3ny0AwRb0IfEUmjIEAd71laKK+NnkAJJdRBng8fWIyj5+ +P2mN1tbU8cM01UGLL2Y8BZ4MZjnEKBxBCfRVDxq06rmhAmr/Sx4DcdoVD64yXj5/Xlz 070MUICojpFIQR9M9DfglOFZjtbbNHfhw7Rw3Ka+Jm2oJGScb9nAD+T339FXNnP8d1fs ooRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5323IN6VOZ1VU1DxhoZBIF0gC7nu9DEnv9LjnxYbkbVQfcaMK4ZK b6LAE/011NGh6mQSVci+jvHaDGOqrUzXyVg0O4o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyhnr3Ap4yEK3nfh+u+2aLAJoJmbs85MWOTaVsPZl0q40nDgdMqNBaZOJhyhhhKG6KqEboYRh3HFUGtN5vme/Y= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4789:: with SMTP id cw9mr10943790ejc.97.1644831717837; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 01:41:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87czjpx3o0.fsf@igel.home> In-Reply-To: <87czjpx3o0.fsf@igel.home> From: =?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane_Archer?= Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:41:45 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#53982: date (GNU coreutils) 8.30 bug report "17 april 2022 + 37 week 5pm" To: Andreas Schwab Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000041cfe405d7f73a7b" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53982 Cc: 53982@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --00000000000041cfe405d7f73a7b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andreas, thank you for your help, I didn't realize I was using the wrong format for what I wanted. I don't have much experience with the project. The format I wanted was: YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss.sZ is +'%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.0Z' do what I want or are there still some mistakes there? Thank you again and sorry for the bug report, it was late and I was sure to have found a bug ^^" Best regards St=C3=A9phane Archer On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 9:17 AM Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Feb 13 2022, St=C3=A9phane Archer wrote: > > > $ date -d "17 april 2022 + 36 week 5pm" +'%G-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.0Z' > > 2022-12-25T17:00:00.0Z > > $ date -d "17 april 2022 + 37 week 5pm" +'%G-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.0Z' > > 2022-01-01T17:00:00.0Z > > $ date -d "17 april 2022 + 38 week 5pm" +'%G-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.0Z' > > 2023-01-08T17:00:00.0Z > > ``` > > as you can see the input "17 april 2022 + 37 week 5pm" makes date retur= n > > the wrong output for some unknown reason. > > It doesn't make sense to use %G without %V, or to use it in place of %Y. > > $ date -d "17 april 2022 + 37 week 5pm" +'%G/%V %Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.0Z' > 2022/52 2023-01-01T17:00:00.0Z > > -- > Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org > GPG Key fingerprint =3D 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC= 1 > "And now for something completely different." > --=20 Best Regards, Stephane Archer --00000000000041cfe405d7f73a7b Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Andreas,

thank you for yo= ur help, I didn't realize I was using the wrong format for what I wante= d.
I don't have much experience with the project.
T= he format I wanted was: YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss.sZ
is +'%Y-%m-%dT= %H:%M:%S.0Z' do what I want or are there still some mistakes there?

Thank you again and sorry for the bug report, it was = late and I was sure to have found a bug ^^"

B= est regards

St=C3=A9phane Archer

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 9:17 AM Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
On Feb 13 2022, St=C3=A9phane A= rcher wrote:

> $ date -d "17 april 2022 + 36 week 5pm" +'%G-%m-%dT%H:%M= :%S.0Z'
> 2022-12-25T17:00:00.0Z
> $ date -d "17 april 2022 + 37 week 5pm" +'%G-%m-%dT%H:%M= :%S.0Z'
> 2022-01-01T17:00:00.0Z
> $ date -d "17 april 2022 + 38 week 5pm" +'%G-%m-%dT%H:%M= :%S.0Z'
> 2023-01-08T17:00:00.0Z
> ```
> as you can see the input "17 april 2022 + 37 week 5pm" makes= date return
> the wrong output for some unknown reason.

It doesn't make sense to use %G without %V, or to use it in place of %Y= .

$ date -d "17 april 2022 + 37 week 5pm" +'%G/%V %Y-%m-%dT%H:%= M:%S.0Z'
2022/52 2023-01-01T17:00:00.0Z

--
Andreas Schwab, = schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint =3D 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510=C2=A0 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA = AEC1
"And now for something completely different."


--
Best Regards,

Stephane Archer
--00000000000041cfe405d7f73a7b-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 14 14:02:39 2022 Received: (at 53982-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2022 19:02:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42575 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nJgcR-0003LE-9o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 14:02:39 -0500 Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:44876) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nJgcO-0003L0-3r for 53982-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 14:02:37 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C66D160068; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 11:02:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id yM-sWcfR6Fbr; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 11:02:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2A416006C; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 11:02:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Q-Pyx3ZBPnVj; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 11:02:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (cpe-172-91-119-151.socal.res.rr.com [172.91.119.151]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3852C16005C; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 11:02:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <995b0d1e-7df5-2cf4-d90f-4d326313ebb9@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 11:02:27 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: bug#53982: date (GNU coreutils) 8.30 bug report "17 april 2022 + 37 week 5pm" Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?Q?St=c3=a9phane_Archer?= References: <87czjpx3o0.fsf@igel.home> From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53982-done Cc: 53982-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) On 2/14/22 01:41, St=C3=A9phane Archer wrote: > is +'%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.0Z' do what I want To format an arbitrary timestamp you want "+%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%1NZ",=20 unless you always want a zero after the period. Closing the bug report as there's no bug here. From unknown Tue Sep 23 05:52:54 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:24:10 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator