From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:24:26 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#53931] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-onlykey-solo-python Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C4=81ladhammika?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 21:32:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 53931 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 53931@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: Guix Patches Reply-To: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C4=81ladhammika?= Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.164452869623520 (code B ref -1); Thu, 10 Feb 2022 21:32:03 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2022 21:31:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57368 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nIH2N-00066z-VL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:31:36 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:43828) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nIH2K-00064b-TC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:31:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44944) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nIH2K-0005Pv-NY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:31:32 -0500 Received: from mail-4319.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.19]:34667) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nIH2G-0002Z9-KL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:31:31 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 21:31:25 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1644528686; bh=yWCEfdn8cjq2Gb3UOZ1TqcGT8d4ZSZ654105ADsYizc=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject: Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID; b=HPujbrqZV2DjZnzb/8cwjwFcjB93BM/buqgNylUBn1g/xpFjF7C1IN1Eu8PmB6BJ9 FPRCSGcYQ3ezZm7DLHqPtRiUdK+SD8MWi+e2l5/Id5D2co1WruazSmRRIlD9MKz+3o Wav4saP4zG5Mwz8X0eNlHvRt+zeGRhbeaJ7+iG9Zo17xmEL0Ii3+e65sEJxKWjqcL2 icbIQ69n0j+fU0WlViDDEXxT5BQCyE6YtXuQ8K+4lToa53rBwRkG6Ib/bwNrw6XLee eQN9XbYqqggzzsvi0FkeJD1R48KJEMl+cbfhNdiUbgTuu7LU1ZXkg2M//65569nylX d4mi32W9fDIcg== From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C4=81ladhammika?= Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="b1_xqGGZnNyEJCTBilumFLWWcpKQ0pYW5YfLfAAiuj4" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.19; envelope-from=paladhammika@protonmail.com; helo=mail-4319.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --b1_xqGGZnNyEJCTBilumFLWWcpKQ0pYW5YfLfAAiuj4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All the best, P=C4=81ladhammika --b1_xqGGZnNyEJCTBilumFLWWcpKQ0pYW5YfLfAAiuj4 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name=0001-gnu-Add-python-onlykey-solo-python.patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0001-gnu-Add-python-onlykey-solo-python.patch RnJvbSAzNzJkZWIyOTk4Y2YzYzY3YWU1OWU4OWM2MjlmN2Y1YWI5MmQ3MDE1IE1vbiBTZXAgMTcg MDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBwYWxhZGhhbW1pa2EgPHBhbGFkaGFtbWlrYUBwcm90b25tYWls LmNvbT4KRGF0ZTogVGh1LCAxMCBGZWIgMjAyMiAxNjoyMzo1NSAtMDUwMApTdWJqZWN0OiBbUEFU Q0hdIGdudTogQWRkIHB5dGhvbi1vbmx5a2V5LXNvbG8tcHl0aG9uCgotLS0KIGdudS9wYWNrYWdl cy9weXRob24tY3J5cHRvLnNjbSB8IDI2ICsrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrCiAxIGZp bGUgY2hhbmdlZCwgMjYgaW5zZXJ0aW9ucygrKQoKZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL2dudS9wYWNrYWdlcy9w eXRob24tY3J5cHRvLnNjbSBiL2dudS9wYWNrYWdlcy9weXRob24tY3J5cHRvLnNjbQppbmRleCBl NDljY2RmMWYyLi4yM2I1MmYxYmNlIDEwMDY0NAotLS0gYS9nbnUvcGFja2FnZXMvcHl0aG9uLWNy eXB0by5zY20KKysrIGIvZ251L3BhY2thZ2VzL3B5dGhvbi1jcnlwdG8uc2NtCkBAIC0xNzU3LDMg KzE3NTcsMjkgQEAgKGRlZmluZS1wdWJsaWMgcHl0aG9uLXNvcAogc2NhZmZvbGRpbmcgZm9yIHRo ZSBjb21tYW5kIGxpbmUsIHdoaWNoIHNob3VsZCBtYWtlIGl0IHJlbGF0aXZlbHkgZWFzeSB0bwog c3VwcGx5IGEgaGFuZGZ1bCBvZiBweXRob24gZnVuY3Rpb25zIGFzIG1ldGhvZHMgdG8gYSBjbGFz cy4iKQogICAgIChsaWNlbnNlIGxpY2Vuc2U6ZXhwYXQpKSkgOyBNSVQgbGljZW5zZQorCisoZGVm aW5lLXB1YmxpYyBweXRob24tb25seWtleS1zb2xvLXB5dGhvbgorICAocGFja2FnZQorICAgKG5h bWUgInB5dGhvbi1vbmx5a2V5LXNvbG8tcHl0aG9uIikKKyAgICh2ZXJzaW9uICIwLjAuMjgiKQor ICAgKHNvdXJjZQorICAgIChvcmlnaW4KKyAgICAgKG1ldGhvZCB1cmwtZmV0Y2gpCisgICAgICh1 cmkgKHB5cGktdXJpICJvbmx5a2V5LXNvbG8tcHl0aG9uIiB2ZXJzaW9uKSkKKyAgICAgKHNoYTI1 NgorICAgICAgKGJhc2UzMiAiMXhqMXJ6ejZwcWRzeTBwMmNyMXZhczNudzBsMHlzeHE2d3cxaGdp eWIwY2ZpbTVia2YxaSIpKSkpCisgICAoYnVpbGQtc3lzdGVtIHB5dGhvbi1idWlsZC1zeXN0ZW0p CisgICAoYXJndW1lbnRzICcoIzp0ZXN0cz8gI2YpKSAgICAgICAgICA7bm8gdGVzdHMKKyAgIChw cm9wYWdhdGVkLWlucHV0cworICAgIChsaXN0IHB5dGhvbi1jbGljaworICAgICAgICAgIHB5dGhv bi1jcnlwdG9ncmFwaHkKKyAgICAgICAgICBweXRob24tZWNkc2EKKyAgICAgICAgICBweXRob24t ZmlkbzIKKyAgICAgICAgICBweXRob24taW50ZWxoZXgKKyAgICAgICAgICBweXRob24tcHlzZXJp YWwKKyAgICAgICAgICBweXRob24tcHl1c2IKKyAgICAgICAgICBweXRob24tcmVxdWVzdHMpKQor ICAgKGhvbWUtcGFnZSAiaHR0cHM6Ly9naXRodWIuY29tL3RydXN0Y3J5cHRvL29ubHlrZXktc29s by1weXRob24iKQorICAgKHN5bm9wc2lzICJQeXRob24gbGlicmFyeSBmb3IgT25seUtleSB3aXRo IFNvbG8gRklETzIiKQorICAgKGRlc2NyaXB0aW9uICJQeXRob24gbGlicmFyeSBmb3IgT25seUtl eSB3aXRoIFNvbG8gRklETzIiKQorICAgKGxpY2Vuc2UgbGljZW5zZTphc2wyLjApKSkKLS0gCjIu MzQuMAoK --b1_xqGGZnNyEJCTBilumFLWWcpKQ0pYW5YfLfAAiuj4-- From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:24:26 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#53931] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-onlykey-solo-python Resent-From: Maxime Devos Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 15:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53931 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C4=81ladhammika?= , 53931@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 53931-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53931.164468058917031 (code B ref 53931); Sat, 12 Feb 2022 15:44:01 +0000 Received: (at 53931) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2022 15:43:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35467 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nIuYH-0004Qd-GX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 10:43:09 -0500 Received: from baptiste.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.51]:40000) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nIuYG-0004QT-9g for 53931@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 10:43:09 -0500 Received: from ptr-bvsjgyhxw7psv60dyze.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:3c5f:2eff:feb0:ba5a]) by baptiste.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id uFj6260074UW6Th01Fj6yD; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 16:43:06 +0100 Message-ID: From: Maxime Devos Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 16:43:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Ptr8IrCbUgkKvDx73UYt" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22; t=1644680586; bh=si8mrrpxaodRRH7wigMfU/ZGYmfFQA1JSCwfiDe9How=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=LKbxCdlyzfzlO2vyWnXSwVfFM1jEYeK4gVbIIlbWPBVYf9erIJje1Oecihy18oXhC 7VQl4gXDHK4g69B77dlqjqXdX9t0Wn+TnCy0OvfKEf/hfDf3hPP+E2A13qqHESa73o Z2bd+rZODNjlJfWoVd4HH2aQsvTwQ1OBYbb1HotAaMh2tiheNVBRoh9pxHR8dzhJxM AR/BxetHnyHOFFaTP6laEx75OLQWVnaW2+8lmT2v9xasy8Hjuc0hIeOwD+SnSzCqKt Lm9VqaFuXtbr3lzkV4cXV283L1Vfg/UTF9QcshQqQTAi9BMOhO/uzj1yTlEg6PVcKq hnBFC1lczTdsA== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-Ptr8IrCbUgkKvDx73UYt Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable P=C4=81ladhammika via Guix-patches via schreef op do 10-02-2022 om 21:31 [+0000]: > +=C2=A0=C2=A0 (home-page "https://github.com/trustcrypto/onlykey-solo-pyt= hon") Why not use the upstream of the fork? The latest commits are the same. Greetings, Maxime. --=-Ptr8IrCbUgkKvDx73UYt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYgfVhhccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7s/rAQDDlNpIy3emigV6WeoduO3SiDeB 65Y2CZqytwZ8RdlT1AD8D24+KNl9wSMx4oWVVdHZAbePeFWkwddM7vbAsdrsjAs= =AIPg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Ptr8IrCbUgkKvDx73UYt-- From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:24:26 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#53931] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-onlykey-solo-python Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C4=81ladhammika?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 16:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53931 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Maxime Devos Cc: 53931@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C4=81ladhammika?= Received: via spool by 53931-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53931.164468289321074 (code B ref 53931); Sat, 12 Feb 2022 16:22:02 +0000 Received: (at 53931) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2022 16:21:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35503 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nIv9R-0005Tq-Gr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 11:21:33 -0500 Received: from mail-4325.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.25]:57331) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nIv9M-0005TZ-Dc for 53931@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 11:21:32 -0500 Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 16:21:19 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1644682881; bh=RMFT7QwRyxsVwyJNIjUYqsdRsQCY5aEE3y8H4/F2FQk=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID; b=lATSJbawBek4Uyd2w3PYukmlvszYTxPlrhC/V4a194/AjSHi6mDz/JIexfUus0jBi UttQ2/9x9oyl2kNRSQsPlgpOfIOQ6gTbIS9Wv1iy5HA7gp9cv4+u7wfP+HWetJHlV1 +r3B/etndFI9Z4NO7a1+cI0gds5GNQ3DRBgDulvadWL6UMot0VXjcUTQNG4J+oqroA 3w1hlyzOYvMuJzeN7agg3aIgpcBZPkxHNivDSWWQnonAKS4y1mPxgPdjgKTK5w2HmM J/x/sw/aDq1YlWovZXKcaovC2wKF9+dmXBpl22NAjWGWSXfKEzGBWH1G4+RRh90PMZ 7sztxCjj929Bg== From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C4=81ladhammika?= Message-ID: <9ktA8eaiUNIC0uf3Cb3B4UXXGAX4BPNS34YXJbZ1_erhzyXmqYDico48XuuiBhbH01gT3XP5VXrsvkmL1kzXjb-vk2U0M8v7KKV5cRdOKlk=@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Are they? The trustcrypto fork claims to be 12 commits ahead. Even still it= makes sense to use the fork that by trustcrypto since they also produce th= e onlykey package, no? All the best, P=C4=81ladhammika ------- Original Message ------- On Saturday, February 12th, 2022 at 3:43 PM, Maxime Devos wrote: > P=C4=81ladhammika via Guix-patches via schreef op do 10-02-2022 om 21:31 > > [+0000]: > > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0 (home-page "https://github.com/trustcrypto/onlykey-solo-p= ython") > > Why not use the upstream https://github.com/solokeys/solo-python of > > the fork? The latest commits are the same. > > Greetings, > > Maxime. From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:24:26 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#53931] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-onlykey-solo-python Resent-From: Maxime Devos Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 17:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53931 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C4=81ladhammika?= Cc: 53931@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 53931-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53931.164468796929469 (code B ref 53931); Sat, 12 Feb 2022 17:47:01 +0000 Received: (at 53931) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2022 17:46:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35587 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nIwTJ-0007fF-3d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 12:46:09 -0500 Received: from andre.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.53]:60270) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nIwTH-0007f4-0v for 53931@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 12:46:08 -0500 Received: from ptr-bvsjgyhxw7psv60dyze.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:3c5f:2eff:feb0:ba5a]) by andre.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id uHm42600W4UW6Th01Hm5RD; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 18:46:05 +0100 Message-ID: From: Maxime Devos Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 18:45:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <9ktA8eaiUNIC0uf3Cb3B4UXXGAX4BPNS34YXJbZ1_erhzyXmqYDico48XuuiBhbH01gT3XP5VXrsvkmL1kzXjb-vk2U0M8v7KKV5cRdOKlk=@protonmail.com> References: <9ktA8eaiUNIC0uf3Cb3B4UXXGAX4BPNS34YXJbZ1_erhzyXmqYDico48XuuiBhbH01gT3XP5VXrsvkmL1kzXjb-vk2U0M8v7KKV5cRdOKlk=@protonmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-iKSY9QAfHZNeXFGxb9CE" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22; t=1644687965; bh=zTPIyZKnALDo161eAVO31e+PBRgmFPLDQMuDfKEoEKg=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=kVyl6hDxZVfCooIt3Ag7zI93/kGVtfhhG9BS3s00biAcxFdwBjtzhmpyoDtiEAsg/ 7hGmfXWGBgxKnU+U3W4rEDXFfHFwCtO0Hrv4xERTl0ldW5BuEfETv71qfuHl5I1o5m /dJX63gYfEWOoL1QkcDvcE9yhmUPYmB/m459TlxbuhrfI8ddPBJK5TPHnMjduYIf6f yagsjhoNUUrlKTQRS9SOK681t4RsgYzNernY7IggQTBiYlSGdy/mQqzKB4C1l5EyJs +eIMg20VfAasEavm5uxbO55g7mkYZn0lDejonAaG/C0t6O4IDvq66YViTBPXs52g7J nr4pszut+cRCg== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-iKSY9QAfHZNeXFGxb9CE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable P=C4=81ladhammika schreef op za 12-02-2022 om 16:21 [+0000]: Are they? The trustcrypto fork claims to be 12 commits ahead. > Even still it makes sense to use the fork that by trustcrypto > since they also produce the onlykey package, no? AFAICT the fork is exactly the same as upstream, except with a slightly different name, without any text in the README and with some docstrings, warnings and error messages tweaked. The only non-tweak commit appears to be , which seems a tiny change that should have been discussed upstream (maybe it's as simple as recognising both pairs of vendor_id/product_id). Also, no development seems to happen in the fork, development happens upstream. The fork does not appear to accept pull requests and there is no option for submitting an issue,=C2=A0whereas upstream does, so it seems that upstream has a much better community. Considering all this, this does not appear to be a fork in the sense that, say, XEmacs is a fork of Emacs. Instead, it appears to be pure branding -- and branding that will cause collisions in the profi= le at that if both upstream and the trustcrypto-branded variant are installed in the same profile, since the variant didn't change module names. As such, I do not see a reason to prefer the branded variant over upstream, and I would recommend not to, to prevent future problems (see profile collisions), to reduce the number of packages that need to be updated and to not cater to marketing. Greetings, Maxime. --=-iKSY9QAfHZNeXFGxb9CE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYgfyVBccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7nbYAP9tQazTccDVNXj3QEUDve/zLdcy smO/rAwscvsS5tmiCAD/QZcPsDMOzT0qQyfRpcuCdBddNfFqCvnuqG4CSTGgcwc= =hUBR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-iKSY9QAfHZNeXFGxb9CE--