GNU bug report logs -
#53909
[PATCH 0/4] 'guix pull -l' no longer displays package lists by default
Previous Next
Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 22:13:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Hi!
zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 at 23:12, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> The other day on IRC zimoun noted that ‘guix pull -l’ doesn’t work for
>> them because it prints those long package lists, which incidentally
>> makes it slower.
>
> My remark is based on the rate of changes. Let assume that regular
> users "pull" once a week – I even guess it is less frequent than that.
>
> Here the number of additions this user would see for the last 10 weeks:
[...]
> Therefore, the current display of “guix pull -l” is not human readable.
Yeah, though it’s searchable in $PAGER.
>> $ ./pre-inst-env guix pull --details -l
>
> Note it hits bug#50472 [1]. Other said,
>
> guix pull -l --details
>
> does not work as expected.
>
> 1:<http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/50472
Right.
>> Ludovic Courtès (4):
>> pull: '--list-generations' doesn't list package changes by default.
>> ui: 'with-paginated-output-port' gives access to the wrapped port.
>> ui: 'display-generation' uses color when talking to a pager.
>> pull: '--list-generations' pipes its output to the pager.
>
> Well, I am mainly running CLI with Emacs ’M-x shell’, so Emacs is my
> pager. :-) However, I have tried with xterm and PAGER=less, nothing is
> different. Do I miss something?
The output gets piped to the pager now, which wasn’t the case before (I
tested in xterm FWIW).
Thanks,
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 156 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.