From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 08 23:19:11 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2022 04:19:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49337 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHeRj-00011C-NH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 23:19:11 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49520) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHeRi-000115-Gk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 23:19:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56382) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHeRi-0005lT-BL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 23:19:10 -0500 Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b] (port=45764 helo=mail-qt1-x82b.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHeRg-0007Oi-CA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 23:19:09 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-x82b.google.com with SMTP id o3so863673qtm.12 for ; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 20:19:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=BIPK7xDnVTB18T/vQpItRSTd4GXwraP0COfOwyTO+ds=; b=Bsd5B6yv/RrON9qBtNnzkZwshUhKvQN3jHqUSIoc5q3I5Cg30dTWCIL/yOE85zq617 TzlXqcQxSCtial0iR2kFJJGLYUta/9rLNNnXpQsXydhz3pNo71DK6ubHy4wZqyG0ltZG H/Or4qkvxGH22e4wnoYV6V8jGc/GrKRtmxIMKvxKUX+EtJC0mfg+km4Rv2NrV+h+MpsB EQEiTG8KMTTirU907esTC0LRwwHdM5K58RCX+/co7DwHfzXDJugNaCZvB4f2av0Dkf92 HQ80xPZ0e2C2GV6k+RUFKuygUB8Q9vEx8IA4WFixVA0ga59k4DvEtdlUYt4hIbd+Lmv4 4DYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=BIPK7xDnVTB18T/vQpItRSTd4GXwraP0COfOwyTO+ds=; b=5cPklMAWVDCW9BXu1KcfOUnHYIIFzIi37x+o9n1BHnKw/7miHcMJayX0XcTUztksO2 uNmmHAS4yJPQqYPkZtzy6donPfa+FYs7ysJGyzJShdQ+ebpDm/WEOzlAEmDeKXEWpJLs GFTNgg1e3dtErwM3b4HINhA99AaHjjMrAbQTwypIc19B617ikbgdEceGGOVTj69hgJ02 gyidfyJxUPIKJnePqzTPTGYQAMk3zd6lez1/PzWYGqWq0RaRchUrZfpjerM3q6jpiGP4 V/F7FVvZsWNwmVNVEJveSquvI4k6oEB9l1WcT49sA+XeevM8upvNtMamo5EVn+9Gnex9 CARA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FoOkzeR+gnrVunMvZp4Y7BPoTZ2zXfT9v1VLmI+tvmR7YZEAz IE9HypwTsfgqUu+5q3DGgOPn6Ns53VYjZg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwf+HAqRoDxPwqf6vzzx+GPl2VHJetmrGDcwFfuhh4c32H0GBXPErFuhIfRYeaornILpyFViQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:34d:: with SMTP id r13mr213101qtw.335.1644380343688; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 20:19:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-154-179.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.154.179]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w22sm8804907qtk.7.2022.02.08.20.19.03 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Feb 2022 20:19:03 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: bug-guix Subject: guix shell not reading manifest.scm when used with '--' Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 23:19:02 -0500 Message-ID: <87czjw1xl5.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b; envelope-from=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com; helo=mail-qt1-x82b.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hello Guix! Consider the following: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ mkdir /tmp/test && cd /tmp/test $ cat < manifest.scm (packages->manifest (list (specification->package "make"))) EOF $ guix shell guix shell: error: not loading '/tmp/test/manifest.scm' because not authorized to do so hint: To allow automatic loading of `/tmp/test/manifest.scm' when running `guix shell', you must explicitly authorize its directory, like so: echo /tmp/test >> /home/maxim/.config/guix/shell-authorized-directories $ echo /tmp/test >> /home/maxim/.config/guix/shell-authorized-directories $ guix shell guix shell: loading environment from '/tmp/test/manifest.scm'... The following derivation will be built: /gnu/store/886dfpr1fc43insawzbnk8s713bh9nf8-profile.drv building CA certificate bundle... listing Emacs sub-directories... building fonts directory... building directory of Info manuals... The following builds are still in progress: /gnu/store/40p4vzxxmhz6ah25cx4iil3v5f87lmwn-info-dir.drv /gnu/store/k0jkw8rfskymq3lnkdjs9ljmccvbwcc3-fonts-dir.drv /gnu/store/y3y53p535v0nqvfjlzb3bw352m78xmdx-emacs-subdirs.drv The following builds are still in progress: /gnu/store/40p4vzxxmhz6ah25cx4iil3v5f87lmwn-info-dir.drv /gnu/store/k0jkw8rfskymq3lnkdjs9ljmccvbwcc3-fonts-dir.drv The following build is still in progress: /gnu/store/40p4vzxxmhz6ah25cx4iil3v5f87lmwn-info-dir.drv building profile with 1 package... [env]$ exit $ guix shell -C -- make guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment guix shell: error: make: command not found --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The last command exhibit the problem. Thanks, Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 09 04:15:35 2022 Received: (at 53892) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2022 09:15:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49789 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHj4Z-00066i-2v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 04:15:35 -0500 Received: from jpoiret.xyz ([206.189.101.64]:41426) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHj4X-00064S-Dk for 53892@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 04:15:33 -0500 Received: from authenticated-user (jpoiret.xyz [206.189.101.64]) by jpoiret.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2F7441851DE; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 09:15:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpoiret.xyz; s=dkim; t=1644398131; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=h+qKrZgaMrUDrfTre0JzwTQ/+eL0VPE+mXHLtD6BYXw=; b=j9jbqANW0pCGC5ypiIgtCBfuGXwLtOo1kGmN8nz02bkYfaxLyuOf1/LZnOzSTYU4qQn6xd 5iTgRWNK2iinm/5xPLcvy2hh4SqEOgpByDrKd18/hL53ryCtdJyykfWDhxnUTYZwMHCNo6 Cg+zXBI+1E+eBChMiKzurpuP7sdYiJz2ql0qL8Q62N9XXKCsNvs95XGFgMjZoOpKsgfUGl yERNCjO4Cl+nLGJiYEP4jb9RlffmDDKK/aLytKVvwkXeTHbaxhiFqVFXUjn4qLjTKQfLsH zL2ce+0TSZMyq1FA6SwBUGzaNc1natoutgjAX4dFwSjvTi18fnEjn/9lrCR0hA== From: Josselin Poiret To: Maxim Cournoyer , 53892@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#53892: guix shell not reading manifest.scm when used with '--' In-Reply-To: <87czjw1xl5.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87czjw1xl5.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:15:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87tud8mmdp.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Authentication-Results: jpoiret.xyz; auth=pass smtp.auth=jpoiret@jpoiret.xyz smtp.mailfrom=dev@jpoiret.xyz X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Maxim, Maxim Cournoyer writes: > --88--- > $ guix shell -C -- make > guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment > guix shell: error: make: com [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.6 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53892 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Maxim, Maxim Cournoyer writes: > --88--- > $ guix shell -C -- make > guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment > guix shell: error: make: com [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.6 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)] 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Hi Maxim, Maxim Cournoyer writes: > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > $ guix shell -C -- make > guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment > guix shell: error: make: command not found > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > The last command exhibit the problem. I believe this is [1]. [1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52347#18 Best, -- Josselin Poiret From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 09 10:40:34 2022 Received: (at 53892) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2022 15:40:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52361 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHp57-0005DE-Ro for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:40:34 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f170.google.com ([209.85.160.170]:41708) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHp53-0005Cj-7s; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:40:30 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f170.google.com with SMTP id y8so2089092qtn.8; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 07:40:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=pHcW9NkWFItNY8R/cOaEUsqh6zWUhA7ID7q1PcIeVx4=; b=WGci2OU0uATAVF2KnpbS+4iIdIqeA3l9eDCC4+Zaz9UNjotP9leOOw1C028l1Fk90g 5pgb+REjKqxLjNCnw2qzYKVPdPf08eaDtHek7FuxNF//3JsZKzObU4mWU6vKxvH0o/bR LEumlJX02K5fHB2qYjTKpJNGyHBWnYECZEbm8meNSOKBISh+iL8Sr1wspblEcA1WAf0w ySqmXhb7ykJP1qpd81uNwPbZSmQ/aXXUZDuX6+xaFN44yOOxVIsBrt2VrEGNlDJ1ir3O 36wx4Hl/29NpPvbKts99rm/P0/AxnDfR+9hDvgw4JxL5J2CaskO81wKupND3WS9wlAvY Rt4A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=pHcW9NkWFItNY8R/cOaEUsqh6zWUhA7ID7q1PcIeVx4=; b=oRHbyvNLko5WoGSIR3rvgJrktCEoe4du+YHK3wtte3ncmC+k1WxhBamW0Bde2PbxME CV+pNpcAennrzf/agRH5IsFbYoQF3nKRbIyjwd45FxgAXtJuhkxMm9rEYof0HcHj53Ou 7XYJb3F8AfrE5t7fY0KgRIdyKOKrNILEQlWlxWM+dOnW40z2JBz7e+yJR4XR2JuPDw4e yuABEaMoVG7Td+eEuOp2QVKIAKskWrPVJHuXbqSr4fjGbGkYesebllUEfX6Ccbt6vBnM SOuPfMTk2i8cng4EG9iay9WDg2+i6W1Y8y1KFTXyQn9Z2NxSANzLMpj8nZil9vo7QlYz DSvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530MZiwO6ojfdpwiM6rq9DlSqfcTJIGEK6ziK0nMs8AF/AC2gDfq 0syWmAuWhV8ArmcCRNVH6linPWr022c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx+5phIVi/DPuBCjHU2+rMc4bKZ1A+sCfZkJ5bzzY19xpoLdKpjwCSF7uZ57+olW/NTVi+OBw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:308:: with SMTP id q8mr1757494qtw.554.1644421223479; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 07:40:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-128-211.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.128.211]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y2sm8337336qke.33.2022.02.09.07.40.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Feb 2022 07:40:22 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Josselin Poiret Subject: Re: bug#53892: guix shell not reading manifest.scm when used with '--' References: <87czjw1xl5.fsf@gmail.com> <87tud8mmdp.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:40:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87tud8mmdp.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> (Josselin Poiret's message of "Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:15:30 +0100") Message-ID: <87sfssyro9.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: merge 52347 53892 thanks Hello Josselin! Josselin Poiret writes: Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (maxim.cournoyer[at]gmail.com) 1.6 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.160.170 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.160.170 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53892 Cc: 53892@debbugs.gnu.org, GNU Debbugs X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) merge 52347 53892 thanks Hello Josselin! Josselin Poiret writes: > Hi Maxim, > > Maxim Cournoyer writes: > >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> $ guix shell -C -- make >> guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment >> guix shell: error: make: command not found >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> The last command exhibit the problem. > > I believe this is [1]. > > [1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52347#18 Oh, I had missed it; thanks for pointing it out. I've merged the two issues. Thank you! Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 02 05:41:15 2022 Received: (at 53892) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2022 10:41:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39192 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nPMPz-0008Uv-BM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 05:41:15 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:58040) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nPMPx-0008Ui-GT for 53892@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 05:41:14 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41D4242; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 11:41:07 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vuzeHPknqssM; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 11:41:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net [91.160.117.201]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88894203; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 11:41:06 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Josselin Poiret Subject: Re: bug#53892: guix shell not reading manifest.scm when used with '--' References: <87czjw1xl5.fsf@gmail.com> <87tud8mmdp.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 11:41:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87tud8mmdp.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> (Josselin Poiret's message of "Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:15:30 +0100") Message-ID: <87a6e84oxp.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: F41D4242 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com,debbugs.gnu.org] X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Josselin Poiret skribis: > Maxim Cournoyer writes: > >> --88--- >> $ guix shell -C -- make >> guix shell: warning: no packages specified; c [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 1.6 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53892 Cc: 53892@debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Josselin Poiret skribis: > Maxim Cournoyer writes: > >> --88--- >> $ guix shell -C -- make >> guix shell: warning: no packages specified; c [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 1.6 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Hi, Josselin Poiret skribis: > Maxim Cournoyer writes: > >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> $ guix shell -C -- make >> guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment >> guix shell: error: make: command not found >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> The last command exhibit the problem. > > I believe this is [1]. > > [1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52347#18 Should we close as =E2=80=9Cnotabug=E2=80=9D? Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 02 09:05:05 2022 Received: (at 53892-close) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2022 14:05:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39439 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nPPbF-0003al-0W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 09:05:05 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f174.google.com ([209.85.222.174]:39795) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nPPbC-0003aA-Jk for 53892-close@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 09:05:03 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f174.google.com with SMTP id t21so1282997qkg.6 for <53892-close@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 06:05:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f30gm4GTwrCyXxdqX8jUB4t2syU5LrCwrf0sR9i0iLE=; b=U+gknLAwJQyK9AeoQeS7ZsQAm7cZVX0gr9Fif5QlhdeGkT3bqT+uSh6OsL3w1mZNEI YIxkCiCOybHq1vyLmHIKhuV7iOK+s8uwHGm0783KwsGJ85YLuTXO0P6P/XNjDsbzO7z0 kYNG1USotugGBaj+jwEo3KFv+tVeLgdt3hsb4U2k/WOKNvmGvCw3Xbjpob5qV3ze4/Rd 8EAZsD7Z8hYOLVYmVk2Ge1zRK93Y5GMdqw8D5jUwQnaCYUmXODC1CaxepYq4ALYIEgIi Dj5nHMiq4XTgmVZn4/fKau8KuzOBAHKc2ZP1OYJSaGK5rTegYvb68Y5JgUD2jbiXl4LQ ox7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f30gm4GTwrCyXxdqX8jUB4t2syU5LrCwrf0sR9i0iLE=; b=6CmW1iI9X2FC7Hu2e+k+DA5N4MunbE8t4FFEArvBNYt6S9AO0gEB+wjMtBAlherg9l KDuFJ9A1pXXAy3/zzw/YwxRwnwCQEN3p4/I2akj9vMX1YZpM7fu1DO2K9uNCWlcjuxz9 qB3tYR7HgO6KxqNgmTMKOtMNQY9IOwwl9BKEnQ8dFQmeqW74+stUSX/LrSHB/wb7Ut41 C9E+dj3UEZivzKJznNZzMlNhNXmjNUjigCzuIf5YFmYybWYVpWWcNB72EdoquiIJ6y1m i3+kC1nbhBq3cpr4OZFrNBDLO/qM/35Flhzk0ArSc57h/bqHpfGoxIU1L+Eud4N2ZB9u 5WZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533acxzpXvLGuK9SAkvSr4NuRWLPP/FRfz9ZR5dJ0fKwRjU+vI6s ketzvE6PvR0oDFVLP2SSWnZVLKEdCeQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz4gvFhdC/h24CuCpoql4f6d//r9DcUAZGtk6mWk4YKYCilbXuwaK3Y0vxUxYlU96t2jmeNNQ== X-Received: by 2002:a37:aa0a:0:b0:507:568:5686 with SMTP id t10-20020a37aa0a000000b0050705685686mr16675883qke.254.1646229895778; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 06:04:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-155-199.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.155.199]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s11-20020a37a90b000000b005f1806cbfe4sm8442803qke.42.2022.03.02.06.04.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 02 Mar 2022 06:04:55 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#53892: guix shell not reading manifest.scm when used with '--' References: <87czjw1xl5.fsf@gmail.com> <87tud8mmdp.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> <87a6e84oxp.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 09:04:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87a6e84oxp.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Wed, 02 Mar 2022 11:41:06 +0100") Message-ID: <874k4gjvqx.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 53892 notabug -- Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Courtès writes: Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (maxim.cournoyer[at]gmail.com) 1.6 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.222.174 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.222.174 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53892-close Cc: Josselin Poiret , 53892-close@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) tags 53892 notabug -- Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi, > > Josselin Poiret skribis: > >> Maxim Cournoyer writes: >> >>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >>> $ guix shell -C -- make >>> guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environme= nt >>> guix shell: error: make: command not found >>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >>> >>> The last command exhibit the problem. >> >> I believe this is [1]. >> >> [1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52347#18 > > Should we close as =E2=80=9Cnotabug=E2=80=9D? That seems reasonable; and I see it's already documented as such. Good for me! Thanks for pointing it out. Maxim From unknown Sat Jun 21 05:16:43 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator