From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 07 22:24:09 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2022 03:24:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44481 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHH6v-0004lZ-Nk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 22:24:09 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:40320) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHH6t-0004lR-A9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 22:24:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39658) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHH6t-0000CS-4r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 22:24:07 -0500 Received: from mail-4319.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.19]:15685) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHH6o-0008F9-JF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 22:24:06 -0500 Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 03:23:57 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1644290639; bh=rISYRXPA4rwflWhIX1Wapossyv0JJfQqA2ZUhZsOKy8=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject: Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID; b=XxyGgwQMeeFc8UlFwFTt9JoIq3to/JxVCzWAIUZ6dwZr5J5dLleZ5H1C+vMdQdFcq DwphftnFp+PABf6+1oYuqk8fPZOl5XSyHW8RBzVt3uVSgy/VevKLfNDsepAKZ2jSvy JxJFCTST/aYm/Z2H12wPROOewxjL//soJItS6aACX4ZhxOsGZo6MIvKRwhJoaxZI1F wPHEX3soPaJ4GmneeJ1uta5RturNlVGva1h/54iKxYzrIEXEkpFm2qjNMzJM//C9Lv SZquUuHyB59hIdkXlurBHBtbK7grelhLAndOPn74pP+r8iIAbSV8G67AzBXpdShINE 7lTg6BcTpAhlQ== To: "bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" From: goncholden Subject: face-attribute giving bold for ultra-bold attribute Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b1_LB0m7QdbDPytEwRI0zeoPtmgsmghTR9LxlzaeCNoM" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.19; envelope-from=goncholden@protonmail.com; helo=mail-4319.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: goncholden Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --b1_LB0m7QdbDPytEwRI0zeoPtmgsmghTR9LxlzaeCNoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SSBoYXZlIGNhbGxlZCBpbiBteSBpbml0IGZpbGUKCihzZXQtZmFjZS1hdHRyaWJ1dGUgJ2RlZmF1 bHQgbmlsIDpoZWlnaHQgMTYwIDp3ZWlnaHQgJ3VsdHJhLWJvbGQpCgpCdXQgKHByaW5jIChmYWNl LWF0dHJpYnV0ZSAnZGVmYXVsdCA6d2VpZ2h0KSkgZ2l2ZXMgYm9sZC4= --b1_LB0m7QdbDPytEwRI0zeoPtmgsmghTR9LxlzaeCNoM Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGRpdiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IGFyaWFsOyBmb250LXNpemU6IDE0cHg7Ij48ZGl2IHN0 eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTogYXJpYWw7IGZvbnQtc2l6ZTogMTRweDsiPkkgaGF2ZSBjYWxsZWQg aW4gbXkgaW5pdCBmaWxlPGJyPjwvZGl2PjxkaXYgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiBhcmlhbDsg Zm9udC1zaXplOiAxNHB4OyI+PGJyPjwvZGl2PjxkaXYgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiBhcmlh bDsgZm9udC1zaXplOiAxNHB4OyI+Jm5ic3A7IChzZXQtZmFjZS1hdHRyaWJ1dGUgJ2RlZmF1bHQg bmlsIDpoZWlnaHQgMTYwIDp3ZWlnaHQgJ3VsdHJhLWJvbGQpPGJyPjwvZGl2PjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9 InByb3Rvbm1haWxfc2lnbmF0dXJlX2Jsb2NrIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IGFyaWFsOyBm b250LXNpemU6IDE0cHg7Ij48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJwcm90b25tYWlsX3NpZ25hdHVyZV9ibG9jay11 c2VyIHByb3Rvbm1haWxfc2lnbmF0dXJlX2Jsb2NrLWVtcHR5Ij48L2Rpdj48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJw cm90b25tYWlsX3NpZ25hdHVyZV9ibG9jay1wcm90b24iPjwvZGl2PjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+PGJyPjwv ZGl2PjxkaXYgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiBhcmlhbDsgZm9udC1zaXplOiAxNHB4OyI+QnV0 IChwcmluYyAoZmFjZS1hdHRyaWJ1dGUgJ2RlZmF1bHQgOndlaWdodCkpIGdpdmVzIGJvbGQuPGJy PjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+PGJyPjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+PGJyPjwvZGl2PjwvZGl2Pg== --b1_LB0m7QdbDPytEwRI0zeoPtmgsmghTR9LxlzaeCNoM-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 08 00:54:32 2022 Received: (at 53866) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2022 05:54:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44795 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHJSR-0003Mj-Px for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:54:31 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:47812) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHJSN-0003MK-4N for 53866@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:54:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=kM9k0BvD0CozxOS4jezU9bygFif2CJOefjPSh1h16YM=; b=nu+WddWijMKUp51Zawk/+7Tduv mtZBrvV7ZpC0Yie/LJMBaMVid8B7lgZ9/AMe+XqUbvhA6jwpJVGdyg4/1XaZliKSRtuDaBCyRplNv lCSPpUvD8UOLOvUHh2xx9nGzCF2NXL05MSxLxoYbM8nnhVFS4RJoUfxAEoReYkyCOfO0=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nHJSD-0001UA-Rr; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:54:20 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: goncholden Subject: Re: bug#53866: face-attribute giving bold for ultra-bold attribute References: X-Now-Playing: Melanie de Biasio's _Blackened Cities_: "Blackened Cities" Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:54:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: (goncholden@protonmail.com's message of "Tue, 08 Feb 2022 03:23:57 +0000") Message-ID: <87v8xpvr7d.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: goncholden writes: > I have called in my init file > > (set-face-attribute 'default nil :height 160 :weight 'ultra-bold) > > But (princ (face-attribute 'default :weight)) gives bold. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53866 Cc: 53866@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) goncholden writes: > I have called in my init file > > (set-face-attribute 'default nil :height 160 :weight 'ultra-bold) > > But (princ (face-attribute 'default :weight)) gives bold. Please use `M-x report-emacs-bug' when reporting bugs so that we can see the information about your Emacs build and OS. Does the font you use have an ultra-bold variation? Very few fonts have that weight (but many have the "black" weight, which is heavier). -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 08 00:54:35 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2022 05:54:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44800 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHJSV-0003N0-4o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:54:35 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:47826) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHJSR-0003MR-Pc for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:54:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ftdBJ2fqlZvH9qctnr1nBFx1MsOKsRBCHsxz82gMHsg=; b=ZmVCcKMniOTIQTneR6ZTbmVjFd 1hKadSii2d9GzI+lbsIp91L2NA3MLLxbvpYuSM8bJnO9IU0EQoEs4u7deZC9eYyVDyAqdxCTlwLmM 1nNGVv3mlcynU1YBl0ZnNp8Dq9RRYLXmSDllVlcSEo1ktrKekNUXCdbflPpAzYDJ+k7A=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nHJSJ-0001UH-Qn for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:54:26 +0100 Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:54:22 +0100 Message-Id: <87tud9vr75.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #53866 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 53866 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 53866 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 08 01:30:18 2022 Received: (at 53866) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2022 06:30:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44894 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHK13-0000rY-NU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 01:30:18 -0500 Received: from mail-4027.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.27]:40772) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHK0y-0000eW-1V for 53866@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 01:30:15 -0500 Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:30:03 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1644301804; bh=Nk6mq16bDencUKi+t1Yu0+fgpA89RK5agSEh8ibHRyU=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID; b=UU3gTzjb3ERwa0RTo9UxIOq+hI/72d22gUoeSZEntWdy7LAFYcufeWFN5Sk4UeWF/ 70NeGxtrMDIGuS8nqKaMu5XKPLB7sWJsN0J/QuRs4HeJHhEUehpwkAb3YFxIqoTU8/ TPsgnl1kApdgEJdpGJdAhaecVCwUkiKL0eaS3kQjJ+etDxk3TrBDULjMLDQ2iDBIlU D6Yj1GnSkVpX+F+WEVGzQpz66CqnjWYR2+bcM0tdRPzilDhN2/CSdOfzgrgQ3weh5Q QiBWoTJyWg8jUkrjMsGnp24VDPc4qdCGoxWPpmhdsWBQvmu+2dafzvwVY5SxSRyB/A C43+xMqvt1GQg== To: Lars Ingebrigtsen From: goncholden Subject: Re: bug#53866: face-attribute giving bold for ultra-bold attribute Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87v8xpvr7d.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87v8xpvr7d.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53866 Cc: 53866@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: goncholden Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) ------- Original Message ------- On Tuesday, February 8th, 2022 at 5:54 AM, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > goncholden goncholden@protonmail.com writes: > > > I have called in my init file > > (set-face-attribute 'default nil :height 160 :weight 'ultra-bold) > > But (princ (face-attribute 'default :weight)) gives bold. > > Please use `M-x report-emacs-bug' when reporting bugs so that we can see > the information about your Emacs build and OS. > > Does the font you use have an ultra-bold variation? Very few fonts have > that weight (but many have the "black" weight, which is heavier). Now that you mention it, I do not know exactly what font emacs is using. I have modus-themes activated. Are there monospace fonts which go to ultra-bold? I do not know whether emacs should report about whether a weight setup fails for the font being used. In GNU Emacs 27.2 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.32) of 2021-09-28 built on fuckup Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundati= on', version 11.0.11906000 System Description: Trisquel GNU/Linux Etiona (9.0) Configured features: XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG SOUND GSETTINGS GLIB NOTIFY INOTIFY GNUTLS FREETYPE HARFBUZZ XFT ZLIB TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS GTK2 X11 XDBE XIM MODULES THREADS PDUMPER GMP Important settings: value of $LC_MONETARY: en_GB.UTF-8 value of $LC_NUMERIC: en_GB.UTF-8 value of $LC_TIME: en_GB.UTF-8 value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8 value of $XMODIFIERS: @im=3Dibus locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix Major mode: Lisp Interaction Minor modes in effect: global-company-mode: t company-mode: t shell-dirtrack-mode: t outline-minor-mode: t icomplete-vertical-mode: t icomplete-mode: t richerenkov-minor-mode: t save-place-mode: t tooltip-mode: t global-eldoc-mode: t eldoc-mode: t electric-indent-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t auto-fill-function: do-auto-fill transient-mark-mode: t Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow sort mail-extr emacsbug message rmc puny rfc822 mml mml-sec epa epg epg-config gnus-util rmail rmail-loaddefs text-property-search mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader sendmail rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mail-utils face-remap company-dabbrev-code company-dabbrev company flight-guidance flight daphne rx faddeev-texi persepolis-fort volterra-elisp foramifer-shell org-tempo tempo ob-C ob-latex ob-awk ob-shell shell ob-calc calc-store calc-trail calc-ext calc calc-loaddefs calc-macs ob-lisp ob-fortran cc-mode cc-fonts cc-guess cc-menus cc-cmds cc-styles cc-align cc-engine cc-vars cc-defs ob-org matryoshka cl org ob ob-tangle ob-ref ob-lob ob-table ob-exp org-macro org-footnote org-src ob-comint org-pcomplete pcomplete org-list org-faces org-entities time-date org-version ob-emacs-lisp ob-core ob-eval org-table ol org-keys org-compat org-macs org-loaddefs format-spec find-func cal-menu calendar cal-loaddefs pachamama-org noutline outline shell-outliner texi-outliner texinfo fort-outliner fortran f90 cus-edit cus-start cus-load wid-edit elisp-outliner pterosaur-outliner ziggurat-protowrit toromona-recluder checkdoc lisp-mnt thingatpt counsel xdg advice xref project dired dired-loaddefs compile comint ansi-color swiper cl-extra help-mode ivy derived delsel ring ivy-faces ivy-overlay colir color orderless icomplete-vertical icomplete contrib teleport richerenkov easy-mmode diamer marshall saveplace speedbar sb-image ezimage dframe modus-vivendi-theme modus-operandi-theme modus-themes typex edmacro kmacro pcase package easymenu browse-url url-handlers url-parse auth-source cl-seq eieio eieio-core cl-macs eieio-loaddefs password-cache json subr-x map url-vars seq byte-opt gv bytecomp byte-compile cconv cl-loaddefs cl-lib tooltip eldoc electric uniquify ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel term/x-win x-win term/common-win x-dnd tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list replace newcomment text-mode elisp-mode lisp-mode prog-mode register page tab-bar menu-bar rfn-eshadow isearch timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core term/tty-colors frame minibuffer cl-generic cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese eucjp-ms cp51932 hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese composite charscript charprop case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev obarray cl-preloaded nadvice loaddefs button faces cus-face macroexp files text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote threads inotify dynamic-setting system-font-setting font-render-setting move-toolbar gtk x-toolkit x multi-tty make-network-process emacs) Memory information: ((conses 16 374514 14523) (symbols 48 38891 2) (strings 32 129711 4054) (string-bytes 1 3645382) (vectors 16 30391) (vector-slots 8 754256 22764) (floats 8 329 86) (intervals 56 436 0) (buffers 1000 14)) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 08 01:42:34 2022 Received: (at 53866) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2022 06:42:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44924 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHKCw-0003Gk-Ha for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 01:42:34 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:48566) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHKCu-0003GY-IT for 53866@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 01:42:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=zLNhGWK44YUyfABcRhGEisj7JvCi/uF7IRkFU32GMRU=; b=OruVElqojGP1pKqyTbiZBC8tVE 02UjUhIqKdkps9WfqtZd3DR/L0vJ7xJBCRmKHYDXfuQp0QAyenHlXgio6sS7RiUVlsBhyTXx7QG2r YBzXnsNRqd/o7JXxCwOJw7Ow+gSv57sHvs6OJ/kmwa3y2NudjW6KqPPmLuNInnLe2b0o=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nHKCl-0001xB-U2; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 07:42:26 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: goncholden Subject: Re: bug#53866: face-attribute giving bold for ultra-bold attribute References: <87v8xpvr7d.fsf@gnus.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEXf3d+wqKmjWWdM PkD///8I5xZsAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+YCCAYnJr/4YpoAAAGCSURBVDjLbdPttYMg DADQBBZIwgICCwjZf7cXAira54+2h2u+gAJcD/tn6FVLVa3wAEEhCLbavhC1GajmNwAn1QnlHeGA WbXIDowGzbj2bFBuECK4oW/AJFQ7AdbCkssGrNmKnFDygPwUT+0IauWFB/AD2q1LVTLgHVDnczIT vyMuILKY34iGo5ENYh/LnZQ/UMnft+8PrESgPhPjp4SB16A7AtsqbcVHohsieUxLhy3yddCAEA9I HkNMyGNlAZ6QvGHb5i1iNjyLOOAOc0AcQyDvULRq9+E+UA0sE3q32yZau6LnL4zbk8Zp2Ni0AfIx 4Ji7sdWwhaTRxjOgDZAFogF4R7RDhhVhs9F4b2USgjvVC8qYYxYHMJYnkw94rAo3WKYZgVk4b5AH 9KQ52F3bQNgh9nFt5QHMA1ILXURKHjD/BsF7kRaacCnjVi+YFyy02NgL3KkmYItr9Yrw07Sd6+k/ sE3qld6wfgetx7UuG0DQeYAv8EtW9RPhpzMvxF2i/gHS/Et6MT6rMQAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVh dGUAMjAyMi0wMi0wOFQwNjozOTozOCswMDowMF0Z7V4AAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjIt MDItMDhUMDY6Mzk6MzgrMDA6MDAsRFXiAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Melanie de Biasio's _Lilies_: "Afro Blue" Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 07:42:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: (goncholden@protonmail.com's message of "Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:30:03 +0000") Message-ID: <874k59uaeo.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: goncholden writes: > Now that you mention it, I do not know exactly what font emacs is using. > I have modus-themes activated. Are there monospace fonts which go to > ultra-bold? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53866 Cc: 53866@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) goncholden writes: > Now that you mention it, I do not know exactly what font emacs is using. > I have modus-themes activated. Are there monospace fonts which go to > ultra-bold? I have no such fonts. But Sauce Code Pro, for instance, has a Black variation, which is heavier than ultra-bold. `C-u C-x =' will tell you what font you're using. > I do not know whether emacs should report about whether > a weight setup fails for the font being used. Emacs chooses the nearest variation it can find -- it's very common to not have exactly the variety requested installed, so if Emacs were to complain about this, it'd be a lot of noise. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 08 01:56:24 2022 Received: (at 53866) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2022 06:56:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44986 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHKQK-0005w9-5z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 01:56:24 -0500 Received: from mail-40137.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.137]:21995) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHKQH-0005vr-Fw for 53866@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 01:56:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:56:12 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1644303374; bh=b4Ay72l8d7dwKO6+BKf6hjDl1TS0ooiDRyyZ44KhBxE=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID; b=froEjvq3LMCCBAqtG577qBPxF3FrgBR52EdjfVLC78CRZItCjGVv458BiE0aRsl43 VKq0WWgrKixANpUGQxkxBQafyG8iwArKiBv+Q8wQXRQTtbWKXO27ijwE8JwcNbiFOF Lzzsrjh0Qhbe4Lr9LfvCmURQK1adQLDxxbLQ+pbsvBhZdZQnKQGRlP/XeYd5zKIXR4 xGcjTxPqxlIR4Bp6QXrB3/Arhh91CAZGR+Wo2zDF7OGsfrlSvPb7ZMxyx1WSuSbqib +xjpkgzC25F8KN1ctUXsAhcFzkprMTadQJLIdRkg385afIughdG7QlLde0GlD6HETF 8NlU7kyks5bsQ== To: Lars Ingebrigtsen From: goncholden Subject: Re: bug#53866: face-attribute giving bold for ultra-bold attribute Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <874k59uaeo.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87v8xpvr7d.fsf@gnus.org> <874k59uaeo.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53866 Cc: 53866@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: goncholden Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) ------- Original Message ------- On Tuesday, February 8th, 2022 at 6:42 AM, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > goncholden goncholden@protonmail.com writes: > > Now that you mention it, I do not know exactly what font emacs is using= . > > I have modus-themes activated. Are there monospace fonts which go to > > ultra-bold? > I have no such fonts. But Sauce Code Pro, for instance, has a Black > variation, which is heavier than ultra-bold. Is there an easy way to find a font supporting some weight attribute. Curr= ently, it is quite difficult to know what font one can use. > `C-u C-x =3D' will tell you what font you're using. I just get "point=3D146 of 145 (EOB) column=3D0" > > I do not know whether emacs should report about whether > > a weight setup fails for the font being used. > Emacs chooses the nearest variation it can find -- it's very common to > not have exactly the variety requested installed, so if Emacs were to > complain about this, it'd be a lot of noise. Ok From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 08 03:26:42 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2022 08:26:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45137 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHLpi-0000Sq-31 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 03:26:42 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39068) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHLpg-0000Sj-RB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 03:26:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37618) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHLpg-0001by-Dt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 03:26:40 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:46745) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHLpV-0002lH-Cg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 03:26:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1644308779; bh=6RG6k55tFTNZ8bLDlY6E1hZkWYDC1JadMvcT/VP/C9s=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=cWj+gfpH1jSMVyCLRahuFqZak10YxKqII3rfbjw5bWt8DSVg0Ru7YjRlUY0R6Cp75 8mxGn3SoJaYjMDbZP27fpdJAiz4YASOWBiZRnvvoVDG2m5HblZ+q7uDO+iYqOk64UL x5WLUnP7Mp+eXeSXzjsTImzwFHUVDcxTx/+ncefQ= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from strobelfs2 ([89.246.38.38]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MmULr-1nzj3K2pOL-00iPxH; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 09:26:19 +0100 From: Stephen Berman To: goncholden via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Subject: Re: bug#53866: face-attribute giving bold for ultra-bold attribute References: <87v8xpvr7d.fsf@gnus.org> <874k59uaeo.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 09:26:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: (goncholden via's message of "Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:56:12 +0000") Message-ID: <87sfstepcl.fsf@gmx.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:cJES+Z6cQw5MxlpA2TNZZSfWYhf2N00ypn9EA05FdA95EuV4oSJ ON+n21vSOAgTpdi0bTeXq6koEQoZPXc1JJLBT2cOpNM/WpgLuLRJcsUdsckEHfSAy5K1tNG Ny7f0d25G1KJ/jZX/7AeLIbo9zSljIm+J36Pe3kmUieeMG6ToIzDMf0hFWxVH+roXA8n/We ll/cU4FfEPmbWmtfBedyQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:V3RyZ2txKY0=:j0a1PEcB2TaPl4jtYWsTCx 3kFVw+R2wsCeJxMFXF6RRjSljQthMM+nJMs4FOM0bh8Qu9yM7AqNe9xkcw/zCuFauHw+pg/8o WSkJo8J2DQ4UpIbdBCT92vZ4me6/Hv4+D80GFGx4snfIVmHFKUjfhf8eu+0lctsP5WYJoAaO6 uMcUBpz93U2CGMvbhC3x/KAny0LmXxqPH9IEUw51AmZs7O4AOJfdqP3P88iYvOQY7cFILAIPj PDA8lgxMLLbe9nHA5p1mxjgLxWU5iGhM2sR68xWopKXda1jriaDpdP7Vk4NBGjGK58nzOPgWg zhWJ52eQJ8q60T7z8hIAO4NQg6sTDACfCDpizLABW4FYbsDyXzozJbE5iSeHlQg4bjqvNflq1 zhs2Z3J+tMQHLvGGW/rn510xHOen7RcD5m8oMh5RGCJcUTAQoqLOPkwG0Kw3p9Xn9NZDlOEnw 4vw88QA3CP/Bh1mCw+qqUBjdRRDlcfnZCDiCzusny+IWbOk+n+jGTnbJegMKWI2unPGaPxGYY +1CF1CAFOmCxXktoLIFu8RVUJN9RWb/v9qMbzjA0xX7lZFgzdPEZvcx+OY4bFjYxltT5A+86v CuMqp6lSeFxJpEe5DZDv6iMxC0bo2Me/LesINTK/V5WJ1sWRJUxE3Kj1vbzE74Fe93uflXkH/ snMv7haa5FJojQ/qDe+yZMrU7n2NZVfXxxy+ChKxrEnrpo/Sh7gBooS9/hTkyAW7fBrqcbCXj M2tpiCQK04XFUhtRqaytQLD7JByai9cZfjoUjHoRuHTbL5ZgIIbLF7Qz7qorLGgIr/shLzvsx vZOSGoAuTT4Tj57oj1XtVJD+KX2HUmgaPHXWJLDLuB8r1dN4z7ovGqwhX/1XIiG3sxd8z/5N9 9xT2L05qxfHQJrnFep856L3r8QKEz+64Uj5ShQssk8h9MjQEq2VsttNjuIaqkknfoeUsWrFGO KSS9TGPZklgsq/FJNxpFpWmxCKECRl4/D+7sSLOUl62F2HwUssFGa1MnTz9DL3U5Y44K3ApXA AYxkCqnGLf0CK6ZrsBxvmorHK+LJljAEjHnK9BghKnmBbWOXz3Y+1mWnG3krr3HGTcgMK6fKO wUwirKyKlSNQ4c= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.15; envelope-from=stephen.berman@gmx.net; helo=mout.gmx.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , goncholden , 53866@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) On Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:56:12 +0000 goncholden via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" wrote: > ------- Original Message ------- > On Tuesday, February 8th, 2022 at 6:42 AM, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> goncholden goncholden@protonmail.com writes: > > Is there an easy way to find a font supporting some weight attribute. Currently, > it is quite difficult to know what font one can use. > >> `C-u C-x =' will tell you what font you're using. > > I just get "point=146 of 145 (EOB) column=0" Point has to "see" a character for that command to give information about it, so execute it with point not at the end of the buffer (including an empty buffer). Steve Berman From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 08 12:00:49 2022 Received: (at 53866) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2022 17:00:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48449 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHTrF-0003K7-6Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 12:00:49 -0500 Received: from mail-4318.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.18]:31449) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHTrC-0003Jo-Bk for 53866@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 12:00:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 17:00:38 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1644339639; bh=4GU/aS3qUu+tBK/BbjxVq3EBo9jPFB7x+rKWCqt8fOo=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID; b=EiwmCvJJn0/VZBg2UsQzJ1qgxrw8iYOfbOi8lJ6r6XDquDTPlMny7aEjBQrLGwEKH sFC2QEoUNzc4dijmzFJdB/+8MhUso3iNbWUEP/9tTXzylp5qwTzEt3+O6WuqZughC5 B65eyzLEQ7oONrzqFJoIkt5mys7l0LNUxkPAXFvKW+5w+tSfa1szpAQ/nSVVL+2UWo P4PljKOJwO+HLkfZTki83IR397cBnc75GVYmbYDP3QBB9Igw9YJbV0XapYq0Lr7Rht D/EhXWNI1zEu3e8DSwt8Ca4KYSNsetrnT4jjcyxg9/yx8PMAZvv51qaMPdEwqhqGaD xmGrhdI4RtyrQ== To: Stephen Berman From: goncholden Subject: Re: bug#53866: face-attribute giving bold for ultra-bold attribute Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87sfstepcl.fsf@gmx.net> References: <87v8xpvr7d.fsf@gnus.org> <874k59uaeo.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfstepcl.fsf@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53866 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 53866@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: goncholden Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ------- Original Message ------- On Tuesday, February 8th, 2022 at 8:26 AM, Stephen Berman wrote: > On Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:56:12 +0000 goncholden via "Bug reports for GNU Em= acs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org wrote: > > > ------- Original Message ------- > > > > On Tuesday, February 8th, 2022 at 6:42 AM, Lars Ingebrigtsen larsi@gnus= .org wrote: > > > > > goncholden goncholden@protonmail.com writes: > > > > Is there an easy way to find a font supporting some weight attribute. C= urrently, > > > > it is quite difficult to know what font one can use. > > > > > `C-u C-x =3D' will tell you what font you're using. > > > > I just get "point=3D146 of 145 (EOB) column=3D0" > > Point has to "see" a character for that command to give information > > about it, so execute it with point not at the end of the buffer > > (including an empty buffer). > > Steve Berman It is very confusing. I loaded a random elisp file and run the command in = the middle of the buffer to get --------- Type C-x 1 to delete the help window, C-M-v to scroll help. Char: C-j (10, #o12, #xa) point=3D11866 of 22678 (52%) column=3D0 End of buffer position: 11866 of 22678 (52%), column: 0 character: C-j (displayed as C-j) (codepoint 10, #o12, #xa) charset: ascii (ASCII (ISO646 IRV)) code point in charset: 0x0A script: latin syntax: > =09which means: endcomment to input: type "C-x 8 RET a" or "C-x 8 RET LINE FEED (LF)" buffer code: #x0A file code: #x0A (encoded by coding system prefer-utf-8-unix) display: no font available Character code properties: customize what to show old-name: LINE FEED (LF) general-category: Cc (Other, Control) There are text properties here: fontified nil From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 08 14:39:04 2022 Received: (at 53866) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2022 19:39:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48734 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHWKO-0007fB-F0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 14:39:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53912) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHWKM-0007eg-9c for 53866@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 14:39:03 -0500 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=38802 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHWKF-00015v-07; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 14:38:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=qMOzauTuhXfeJRSdNaiIVdTAVfrxl4BYx3nTPBUhxyw=; b=UxxhAxiacKKb 7wDJQbfVI2oO+BROaMcqna3fmi56WC012831mEX6uT+oRu8/NGzYjpG0bXNJEJGgqpSanTiTGtYQ9 M/le6q3xMPvwVQ7sRnly55S2OP8y+69WIeoeVs/k28l1tdPZIiRc1YkGYz6UIYYrcjkMi9W78wAZX CIeLCwOVOP0+1Hg2txn3sKe/+HoU1S/dFOqN3xAnHVv2g3HZPWkOd6UGsrC1mPSIg8XJSF0DaJfkv InjJLOCE37U4SqkXzt6tvxCXsHo36zmKhl0jQY1HNpZBSiM5Yp/EqC7tlrHx6/WXitmfJJ09Y0rqn GvWvcQ0RpsSRcfIJ5FujJg==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2591 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHWKE-00055A-Gg; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 14:38:54 -0500 Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 21:38:43 +0200 Message-Id: <8335ktw3lo.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: goncholden In-Reply-To: (bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org) Subject: Re: bug#53866: face-attribute giving bold for ultra-bold attribute References: <87v8xpvr7d.fsf@gnus.org> <874k59uaeo.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfstepcl.fsf@gmx.net> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53866 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, stephen.berman@gmx.net, 53866@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 53866@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 17:00:38 +0000 > From: goncholden via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > the Swiss army knife of text editors" > > It is very confusing. I loaded a random elisp file and run the command in the middle of the buffer > to get > > --------- > > Type C-x 1 to delete the help window, C-M-v to scroll help. > Char: C-j (10, #o12, #xa) point=11866 of 22678 (52%) column=0 > End of buffer > > position: 11866 of 22678 (52%), column: 0 > character: C-j (displayed as C-j) (codepoint 10, #o12, #xa) > charset: ascii (ASCII (ISO646 IRV)) > code point in charset: 0x0A > script: latin > syntax: > which means: endcomment > to input: type "C-x 8 RET a" or "C-x 8 RET LINE FEED (LF)" > buffer code: #x0A > file code: #x0A (encoded by coding system prefer-utf-8-unix) > display: no font available Put the cursor on a character that has a visible glyph. You have put it on a newline, which leaves no trace on display, so you get "no font" for that. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 08 17:34:50 2022 Received: (at 53866) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2022 22:34:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48969 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHZ4U-0006HX-2g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 17:34:50 -0500 Received: from mail-4318.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.18]:57329) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHZ4S-0006HL-Dz for 53866@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 17:34:48 -0500 Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 22:34:39 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1644359682; bh=ogrhJMuXlNA01yQ/hvbu+2hHBRA1EDbGDx8kigC34nU=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID; b=OvEyyGSdC3IYz2E2aXSgzqy0+3QHnfpnSp0yVAlDkC8DNFvz4ufgeU5m2RFh0AHfl DxcxVZ3o5xp/jyHCoWkfyAnwGpHGj1GDrD2iPZ81pzWh3BxvTtQn3G03iSZFQdRzEJ AzFpmwddMMr27UJBkENYWc/kzchVLqStNKaLfVLZ1gTlk3ozRB5UBcGD2RZCqDtGD7 JLpLrVfOq/KuLoL+gD1a5/7gKqysBPHVdU3QeZI7/qvvuhuWrU2jTsM2w5zBbGdhv9 SDTf6wjEnzdlIsjdWWUMYuPybn5nouYXSxI1jGvB9HITHaC3V8Wf+Abuv9FqxEyYSU n28ICVrzc+obg== To: Eli Zaretskii From: goncholden Subject: Re: bug#53866: face-attribute giving bold for ultra-bold attribute Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8335ktw3lo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v8xpvr7d.fsf@gnus.org> <874k59uaeo.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfstepcl.fsf@gmx.net> <8335ktw3lo.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53866 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, stephen.berman@gmx.net, 53866@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: goncholden Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) ------- Original Message ------- On Tuesday, February 8th, 2022 at 7:38 PM, Eli Zaretskii wro= te: > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 53866@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 17:00:38 +0000 > From: goncholden via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > the Swiss army knife of text editors" bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > > It is very confusing. I loaded a random elisp file and run the command in= the middle of the buffer > > to get > > Type C-x 1 to delete the help window, C-M-v to scroll help. > > Char: C-j (10, #o12, #xa) point=3D11866 of 22678 (52%) column=3D0 > > End of buffer > > position: 11866 of 22678 (52%), column: 0 > character: C-j (displayed as C-j) (codepoint 10, #o12, #xa) > charset: ascii (ASCII (ISO646 IRV)) > > > code point in charset: 0x0A > script: latin > syntax: > which means: endcomment > to input: type "C-x 8 RET a" or "C-x 8 RET LINE FEED (LF)" > buffer code: #x0A > file code: #x0A (encoded by coding system prefer-utf-8-unix) > display: no font available Put the cursor on a character that has a visible glyph. You have put it on a newline, which leaves no trace on display, so you get "no font" for that. Now I understand what I have to do. I went on a word and I get the font name when I execute the command C-u C-x =3D Is there a way emacs can list fonts that closely match some attribute like ultra-bold. Deos emacs know the list of fonts one could use? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 08 22:31:08 2022 Received: (at 53866) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2022 03:31:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49276 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHdhE-0005vq-KC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 22:31:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41026) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHdhA-0005ut-MW for 53866@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 22:31:07 -0500 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=47094 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHdh4-000211-V5; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 22:30:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=wqLdw1R/k4rLpi23BILy/J/GCv0/YvAD6H7F7XeZixU=; b=btgZ7HTeXafk MsKPYES6D61P6BnTc/av3dPioUApGMAZYDqxTaB1qVE9Rp7wT6TQbGYALgT3bSznvqmbgL9MGIV7B nW+No/+MR43xVOuzuye8m53SrjDs+9wGfly1SqqS+SxGpiun/e4jpofXAQepG1+dAqGVToX1Pxom1 K9D925V3RPYgk95I77aZ7bAAQa8WxXuC69j7PDpcXtSTpjkaDSeUB6iz6B3DByCcqblH7Wl/Gd0/4 Nb+RcAIcSh4XGq6vy+i1viFCWzESbkkeRloNXnMF64P7fNEz/0Met24AbNbGlMaFdMu3lRwe9r16j edNP5DdNc/bgnW3ObAaxDQ==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4075 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHdgQ-0006Vz-Av; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 22:30:58 -0500 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 05:30:03 +0200 Message-Id: <831r0cwwck.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: goncholden In-Reply-To: (message from goncholden on Tue, 08 Feb 2022 22:34:39 +0000) Subject: Re: bug#53866: face-attribute giving bold for ultra-bold attribute References: <87v8xpvr7d.fsf@gnus.org> <874k59uaeo.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfstepcl.fsf@gmx.net> <8335ktw3lo.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53866 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, stephen.berman@gmx.net, 53866@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 22:34:39 +0000 > From: goncholden > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, stephen.berman@gmx.net, 53866@debbugs.gnu.org > > Is there a way emacs can list fonts that closely match some attribute > like ultra-bold. We don't have such a command, but it could be written if needed. However, you should really use the dedicated font tools for exploring the fonts on your system, and Emacs is not such a tool. > Deos emacs know the list of fonts one could use? It does, but only in general. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 08 22:44:16 2022 Received: (at 53866) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2022 03:44:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49289 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHdtw-0006GU-88 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 22:44:16 -0500 Received: from mail-40141.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.141]:28735) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHdtt-0006GC-MK for 53866@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 22:44:14 -0500 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 03:44:04 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1644378246; bh=vBZrq2QSliEAIEu2+/pq4yaB1GrsJ6WXLu6BfKVK0Z0=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID; b=m4MgU1Qn66I+5wV4NgZ/PoFhQ7g3ehs7gpEji2yOZtWaaP7dXJwqpIwQ4+SUKFgx6 cPdl4vcnAcUkbVhjsoNjL/YHYqAtEsNRKu9SIGxcG08bVecrTZH+PBkQPBniQdx5CM XfNOP0aXJAcBYUNOJRXjENhvopA+4g5Kdv+XE6SiBdH1wuBMyjnomEX/xl+qchKuSX mUgUJfSlasv2VqPos7cpwO4i09ThH6ATQNaD4Q4zPUW9Nh1rzub2fLCMMGNbx8B6BY AMolY/y0g+2O/4zMjuEmAHaG20BRgdXEinr6KA2vkKIVL69IcazXXsKxJQJV/mxijh ZUOeFsSTg8Ajg== To: Eli Zaretskii From: goncholden Subject: Re: bug#53866: face-attribute giving bold for ultra-bold attribute Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <831r0cwwck.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v8xpvr7d.fsf@gnus.org> <874k59uaeo.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfstepcl.fsf@gmx.net> <8335ktw3lo.fsf@gnu.org> <831r0cwwck.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53866 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, stephen.berman@gmx.net, 53866@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: goncholden Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) ------- Original Message ------- On Wednesday, February 9th, 2022 at 3:30 AM, Eli Zaretskii w= rote: > Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 22:34:39 +0000 > From: goncholden goncholden@protonmail.com > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, stephen.berman@gmx.net, 53866@debbugs.gnu.org > > Is there a way emacs can list fonts that closely match some attribute > like ultra-bold. We don't have such a command, but it could be written if needed. However, you should really use the dedicated font tools for exploring the fonts on your system, and Emacs is not such a tool. > Does emacs know the list of fonts one could use? It does, but only in general. Could emacs describe (with a few examples) some good tools to help users de= fine the font they would want to use. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 09 02:56:30 2022 Received: (at 53866) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2022 07:56:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49571 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHhq2-0000U1-K1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 02:56:30 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:60816) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHhpz-0000Ti-UR for 53866@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 02:56:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=njRZuxrgDlxQdI8B+ItHbnV+jUTjuGG0FDBQfG8KSyU=; b=bv+KkV7v+Hk87N5nGeEfJ92jkA yi0ciG6QiRivvfAKXyq3Hp5x9oqdrwxoxwN/3WCm8EZ3HbXppCRpym5EPdav3h8Hrnt9gHbhRqw6n g1dqsYP1eGfRqJ/FzeDPcISgES6mqIHDow/LsKDkV3QlIuiZyexHHRec2BYzSS+qqvgM=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nHhpr-0007gy-3K; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 08:56:21 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: goncholden Subject: Re: bug#53866: face-attribute giving bold for ultra-bold attribute References: <87v8xpvr7d.fsf@gnus.org> <874k59uaeo.fsf@gnus.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAgMAAAAqbBEUAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAADFBMVEVcFyGRTzbWtYL/ //+WhK8dAAAAAWJLR0QDEQxM8gAAAAd0SU1FB+YCCQc4BB68ILIAAAF5SURBVCjPTdHBTsQgEAbg fzalB0+QlIuP4FMwyeLBEySlsZ7NRvcp9A3axDXRkyausTylM1s1khT4gA4w4PzNIt8CdszAXsB3 gFsEdRLsA3ZLtvhCA64LqqJDQ6XWz3oUNPBeUGvMnSKz9J9MbiBBez/U+rCiGBYEBfmQPO0/cJop MJQuJpATZFAy9zGRzuQAj76zmAUhyJTtE80GSAHwzsWSFbaUYXnug2KyhyJlZF0220cnyzwxgebm IEctxVHEZoqHl+E4jg6EzRzvX3e7l6MXtDOPgtfFCM4Wt0aL/1Di1OK85h/0XvBWn/e1LjFknNXP qeOArAE2koxSAthLBiB4lIa9lfpCkgEQax+4YUUb9F6BdIQMBJayNsY4qSUDCNa3TyzzPemAv5n4 FIDkWbqWG6zFFHZ/IM346UG0C8R+3RTJ/IICTAxwQxJ08l1v0Vwdf/5XDEtaI99t5ak+ygmdonkv aYXscTmXXpG/5MB59noXcgrLBd+qV3T8tGh9swAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMi0wMi0w OVQwNzo1NjowMyswMDowMLvRZ50AAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjItMDItMDlUMDc6NTY6 MDMrMDA6MDDKjN8hAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Erik Satie's _Vexations_: "Vexations" Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 08:56:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: (goncholden@protonmail.com's message of "Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:56:12 +0000") Message-ID: <87wni4pj6l.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: So this doesn't seem to be a bug in Emacs, and I'm therefore closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53866 Cc: 53866@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) So this doesn't seem to be a bug in Emacs, and I'm therefore closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 09 02:56:37 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2022 07:56:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49574 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHhq9-0000UL-QB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 02:56:37 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:60830) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHhq8-0000U8-7T for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 02:56:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=aYf7HsAK18h9zPfoxN5+oYnIEOWrUPWuRXu2UrrHRaQ=; b=f24CbZmrA4PhQI6cgy9D6jliw1 ALzrArhW0P0Otg5Cq8gpql9mchfPe22GbUtlC2vXFcSMuN+FvY4FgSHlVKnbwhfAaW2xuWcZDqTXc AusFYKm9aQpKjvWkAygCTe9gql33lGo1xoGTGPpYAVPkx3RtCpUagoe9jp/jqdOSBzQg=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nHhq0-0007h7-1U for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 08:56:30 +0100 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 08:56:27 +0100 Message-Id: <87v8xopj6c.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #53866 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 53866 notabug close 53866 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 53866 notabug close 53866 quit From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:29:01 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 12:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator