GNU bug report logs - #53865
[PATCH] gnu: ruby-parser: Update to 3.1.0.0.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>

Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 02:12:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #31 received at 53865 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: 53865 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 53865-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 jgart via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [bug#53865] [PATCH] gnu: ruby-parser: Update to 3.1.0.0.
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 16:05:30 -0500
On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 21:00:36 +0100 Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
> jgart via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:05:52 +0100 Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> 
> >> jgart via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:
> >> 
> >> > * gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby-parser): Update to 3.1.0.0.
> >> 
> >> Applied on core-updates (it entails building 5k packages).
> >
> > Thanks Nicolas!
> >
> > What is your workflow for determining whether it goes to core-updates?
> 
> I did
> 
>   guix refresh --list-dependent ruby
> 
> It reported 5000+ packages. According to Submitting Patches section of
> the manual, above 1800, it should go to core-updates (at the moment).
> 
> HTH,

Ah yes, `refresh` not `size`

Thanks!
> -- 
> Nicolas Goaziou




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 101 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.