From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:20:27 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#53865 <53865@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#53865 <53865@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [PATCH] gnu: ruby-parser: Update to 3.1.0.0. Reply-To: bug#53865 <53865@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:20:27 +0000 retitle 53865 [PATCH] gnu: ruby-parser: Update to 3.1.0.0. reassign 53865 guix-patches submitter 53865 jgart severity 53865 normal tag 53865 patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 07 21:11:36 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2022 02:11:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44401 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHFyi-00030D-69 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 21:11:36 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:43768) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHFyg-000306-W0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 21:11:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHFyg-0003FG-Nt for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 21:11:34 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:11622) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHFyb-0005cC-H5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 21:11:31 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id e2e7a4c4 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2022 03:10:38 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=20190914; bh=poIsqMZADMSw+DXgi+AGs7VT+tLZlRmocO7ndzIreb8=; b= YQDEs6qwoez9UeKTeasZ6SiElE+zu9SyS28N/HR2fdRh+VJHd0TTX/1IEAd40Ppp XvaqReLrTj7szbEsrnkcvWpDZh+jJ4XrjYbNu0qgM5St3J0C78bLd7Fc8u/NrDL5 B/hGhBQvWh8th733bgQzO3qoSJPmBUV0idROf4sQmOq/ypDIwg5jCdFq1NHuZT7W DdlZWYNlEMXgKRxlrKIR4NFAFN1rL/vplU+PUGO5+mutw/pli5PzIvxT9xZ4LTOa X/gXjDTHmK7WgiGAqP+6L1BxwJGJZgh/l72kMMjBWrXHHQpwqG2DSJqorq7uHBC+ FMB0dLcJfMTrmRlglcSYqQ== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 2f598388 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2022 03:10:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c08ccfed for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2022 03:10:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 77f0852e (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 8 Feb 2022 03:10:37 +0100 (CET) From: jgart To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ruby-parser: Update to 3.1.0.0. Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 21:08:34 -0500 Message-Id: <20220208020834.5701-1-jgart@dismail.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=78.46.223.134; envelope-from=jgart@dismail.de; helo=mx1.dismail.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: jgart X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) * gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby-parser): Update to 3.1.0.0. --- gnu/packages/ruby.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/ruby.scm b/gnu/packages/ruby.scm index b242aa8295..e15d53eefa 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/ruby.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/ruby.scm @@ -5195,14 +5195,14 @@ (define-public ruby-parallel-tests (define-public ruby-parser (package (name "ruby-parser") - (version "3.0.0.0") + (version "3.1.0.0") (source (origin (method url-fetch) (uri (rubygems-uri "parser" version)) (sha256 (base32 - "1jixakyzmy0j5c1rb0fjrrdhgnyryvrr6vgcybs14jfw09akv5ml")))) + "08q20ckhn58m49lccf93p0yv7pkc7hymmcz3di762kb658d5fd38")))) (build-system ruby-build-system) (arguments '(#:tests? #f)) ; tests not included in gem -- 2.35.0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 09 10:06:05 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2022 15:06:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52327 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHoXl-0004Gq-O2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:06:05 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:32822) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHoXk-0004Gj-Cp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:06:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59326) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHoXk-0007D5-2d for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:06:04 -0500 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:42037) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHoXe-0005SM-0t for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:06:03 -0500 Received: (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D097520016; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 15:05:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou To: jgart via Guix-patches via Subject: Re: [bug#53865] [PATCH] gnu: ruby-parser: Update to 3.1.0.0. References: <20220208020834.5701-1-jgart@dismail.de> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:05:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20220208020834.5701-1-jgart@dismail.de> (jgart via Guix-patches via's message of "Mon, 7 Feb 2022 21:08:34 -0500") Message-ID: <874k58w04v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.200; envelope-from=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr; helo=relay7-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: jgart , 53865-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) Hello, jgart via Guix-patches via writes: > * gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby-parser): Update to 3.1.0.0. Applied on core-updates (it entails building 5k packages). Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 09 13:02:42 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2022 18:02:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52579 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHrIf-000343-Up for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:02:42 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:45942) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHrIe-00033u-RV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:02:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHrIa-0007sn-8P for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:02:36 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:13867) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHrIY-0008RO-AW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:02:35 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 9faabe3c; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:02:20 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20190914; bh=/MXg2pE3gNpjit4KiFVSH0D63H2GLHXn1oChj8FoKhw=; b=YgJ 7/dGeD/gOpEDGCr8sjeFP+10m2WG2z7LIDaJvmacFDg7htzfJ4rltAZws2hXZH5g Y2JteahG0Am/ILr1Vy/Y6BoIdqBa43+xyHardA6f/fj/RP6qypUV2llFGK8WQxgL OHYKowugj7lkScxb+knj0iA0UhQgUC1DltGamWKonDWqmFiElk+Z5rF1uVY1svt4 3Fl+bfaZIjVOH7/Wq1lQ5NwDGJ13sAa+5XXAA/HmBP0xf64SycU7eCfrov0sPzXV IIoAl1xqHgwk3CIoex+98qeRBmtJp3qXoSJaGefBTU/HVoHYLsquf2IcKH/3+W69 li3AZWmwdQW4clP3e3g== Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id b075b1d8; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:02:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 6f671ba1; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:02:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 7e2caa40 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:02:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 13:02:13 -0500 Message-ID: <20220209130213.GB5766@gac.attlocal.net> From: jgart To: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [bug#53865] [PATCH] gnu: ruby-parser: Update to 3.1.0.0. In-Reply-To: <874k58w04v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <20220208020834.5701-1-jgart@dismail.de> <874k58w04v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=78.46.223.134; envelope-from=jgart@dismail.de; helo=mx1.dismail.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 53865-done@debbugs.gnu.org, jgart via Guix-patches via X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:05:52 +0100 Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > jgart via Guix-patches via writes: > > > * gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby-parser): Update to 3.1.0.0. > > Applied on core-updates (it entails building 5k packages). Thanks Nicolas! What is your workflow for determining whether it goes to core-updates? Do you just run `guix size ...` at the end of working on something and then make a decision while consulting that page in the manual that details it? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 09 15:00:51 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2022 20:00:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52819 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHt91-0006T1-5F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 15:00:51 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:42562) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHt8w-0006Sg-Sq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 15:00:47 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60260) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHt8w-0005bk-Hf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 15:00:46 -0500 Received: from [2001:4b98:dc4:8::221] (port=35539 helo=relay1-d.mail.gandi.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHt8u-000123-Jb for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 15:00:46 -0500 Received: (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B290C240007; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 20:00:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou To: jgart via Guix-patches via Subject: Re: [bug#53865] [PATCH] gnu: ruby-parser: Update to 3.1.0.0. References: <20220208020834.5701-1-jgart@dismail.de> <874k58w04v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20220209130213.GB5766@gac.attlocal.net> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 21:00:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20220209130213.GB5766@gac.attlocal.net> (jgart via Guix-patches via's message of "Wed, 9 Feb 2022 13:02:13 -0500") Message-ID: <87o83fvmhn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2001:4b98:dc4:8::221 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:4b98:dc4:8::221; envelope-from=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr; helo=relay1-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 53865-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 53865@debbugs.gnu.org, jgart X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) jgart via Guix-patches via writes: > On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:05:52 +0100 Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> Hello, >> >> jgart via Guix-patches via writes: >> >> > * gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby-parser): Update to 3.1.0.0. >> >> Applied on core-updates (it entails building 5k packages). > > Thanks Nicolas! > > What is your workflow for determining whether it goes to core-updates? I did guix refresh --list-dependent ruby It reported 5000+ packages. According to Submitting Patches section of the manual, above 1800, it should go to core-updates (at the moment). HTH, -- Nicolas Goaziou From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 09 16:05:46 2022 Received: (at 53865) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2022 21:05:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52924 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHu9p-0004ef-Te for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:05:46 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:20581) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHu9n-0004eG-U9; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:05:44 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 98c66374; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 22:05:37 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20190914; bh=nMxQdeUJMh9y+FBraKIAVlvRRvRzzGFy1DVaFQOX4rc=; b=ny9 R0TKEXSEazqByOxsGtqAJw01kf1MQ4aXZ7G7lB7cZ6huFT3K++V5YvkDrjpDlj1g eqb8aRRc2lVQpGSmV8aeD3uPJQpT0AsMlSHp7OGokZ+xkI+s9cq2JYuJa78hlmyI pDpM7a4dHI+rjO0bYau0bf9NPYWF1AmQ+rZiv26yO8qdWYmaC3f6saxcyyuAgTOn tyxnAJCrmCw4m852GKIRSSG19HZh7xuTgFK8+Jr2fyLrWSgRh46/MjoA25mRhjar SfTckQJkqxKNJIcLH0AUkECZXB3hgRdabBWxxL+iASCijKpk0T9e+IsEBMb7u2cY Mv3CDOXzOut0bqE8FPA== Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 0f545235; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 22:05:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 49909a72; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 22:05:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id bc63a9fb (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 9 Feb 2022 22:05:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 16:05:30 -0500 Message-ID: <20220209160530.GB30067@gac.attlocal.net> From: jgart To: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [bug#53865] [PATCH] gnu: ruby-parser: Update to 3.1.0.0. In-Reply-To: <87o83fvmhn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <20220208020834.5701-1-jgart@dismail.de> <874k58w04v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20220209130213.GB5766@gac.attlocal.net> <87o83fvmhn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53865 Cc: 53865@debbugs.gnu.org, 53865-done@debbugs.gnu.org, jgart via Guix-patches via X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 21:00:36 +0100 Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > jgart via Guix-patches via writes: > > > On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:05:52 +0100 Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> jgart via Guix-patches via writes: > >> > >> > * gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby-parser): Update to 3.1.0.0. > >> > >> Applied on core-updates (it entails building 5k packages). > > > > Thanks Nicolas! > > > > What is your workflow for determining whether it goes to core-updates? > > I did > > guix refresh --list-dependent ruby > > It reported 5000+ packages. According to Submitting Patches section of > the manual, above 1800, it should go to core-updates (at the moment). > > HTH, Ah yes, `refresh` not `size` Thanks! > -- > Nicolas Goaziou From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 09 16:17:01 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2022 21:17:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52951 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHuKj-0004y4-9T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:17:01 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:53520) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHuKh-0004xt-73 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:16:59 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57398) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHuKg-00065o-Mx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:16:59 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:34196) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHuKc-0005ba-Rr for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:16:58 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id ffabfb79; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 22:16:45 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20190914; bh=KP2iwyNIM5nn1wEMKabbVLKS3bT0WBdnJQ/UUbwRCSA=; b=NwV ho0gBrWtL7uYSJcAVM2fPQSwsFrZntQviz5YB0O041cYJgXfNgQcQSPYFn1qG3AU EktC0tBb8L+P0RMe+6AgNb94L0Y6HDCJSjRN5pee0AO+2dT5pPIPYWiiM/xXnvfG bk35fSPZ5DOorVloWRJFaQE+agsIaQ4sk0Y+tqvVToB2Bz/MIKa7IZOtnrA8JMac +um43lwyr56qLRQR2AZi8F5mPsz5GmB4fdKkG8lVnyR5N1YaseorppwA2cRW/SPm 2bguvuhQ5+pSrcB+p2f13/QQt7l+m65faNh2HEbSE5cwAbUXQ6pc3wULN1hn3YNf A2rdmf93gwiK6537JNw== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c75279e2; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 22:16:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id ff04adf2; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 22:16:44 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 32f5716d (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 9 Feb 2022 22:16:43 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 16:16:38 -0500 Message-ID: <20220209161638.GD30067@gac.attlocal.net> From: jgart To: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [bug#53865] [PATCH] gnu: ruby-parser: Update to 3.1.0.0. In-Reply-To: <20220209160530.GB30067@gac.attlocal.net> References: <20220208020834.5701-1-jgart@dismail.de> <874k58w04v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20220209130213.GB5766@gac.attlocal.net> <87o83fvmhn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20220209160530.GB30067@gac.attlocal.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=78.46.223.134; envelope-from=jgart@dismail.de; helo=mx1.dismail.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 53865@debbugs.gnu.org, 53865-done@debbugs.gnu.org, jgart via Guix-patches via X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:05:30 -0500 jgart wrote: > On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 21:00:36 +0100 Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > jgart via Guix-patches via writes: > > > > > On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:05:52 +0100 Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> jgart via Guix-patches via writes: > > >> > > >> > * gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby-parser): Update to 3.1.0.0. > > >> > > >> Applied on core-updates (it entails building 5k packages). > > > > > > Thanks Nicolas! > > > > > > What is your workflow for determining whether it goes to core-updates? > > > > I did > > > > guix refresh --list-dependent ruby > > > > It reported 5000+ packages. According to Submitting Patches section of > > the manual, above 1800, it should go to core-updates (at the moment). What do you think if we were to add a smart user message to the `guix refresh --list-dependent ...` command? I was thinking something along these lines: ``` $ guix refresh --list-dependent ruby-parser Building the following 1991 packages would ensure 5378 dependent packages are rebuilt: ... ruby-parser reported 5000+ packages. According to Submitting Patches section of the manual, above 1800, it should go to core-updates (at the moment). ``` Like that, the command reminds the user/calculates for the user what branch to put the package in. I'm imagining it would be as easy as just getting the length of the output and matching against it the appropriate message? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 09 16:24:12 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2022 21:24:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52967 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHuRg-0005Ao-2z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:24:12 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56042) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHuRf-0005Ai-Gj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:24:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58522) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHuRf-0008Dw-CB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:24:11 -0500 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:44943) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHuRd-0006Wy-Bx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:24:10 -0500 Received: (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9B71FF805; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 21:24:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou To: jgart via Guix-patches via Subject: Re: [bug#53865] [PATCH] gnu: ruby-parser: Update to 3.1.0.0. References: <20220208020834.5701-1-jgart@dismail.de> <874k58w04v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20220209130213.GB5766@gac.attlocal.net> <87o83fvmhn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20220209160530.GB30067@gac.attlocal.net> <20220209161638.GD30067@gac.attlocal.net> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 22:24:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20220209161638.GD30067@gac.attlocal.net> (jgart via Guix-patches via's message of "Wed, 9 Feb 2022 16:16:38 -0500") Message-ID: <87k0e3vimj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.199; envelope-from=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr; helo=relay9-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 53865@debbugs.gnu.org, jgart , 53865-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) jgart via Guix-patches via writes: > What do you think if we were to add a smart user message to the `guix refresh > --list-dependent ...` command? > > I was thinking something along these lines: > > ``` > $ guix refresh --list-dependent ruby-parser > > Building the following 1991 packages would ensure 5378 dependent packages are rebuilt: ... > > ruby-parser reported 5000+ packages. According to Submitting Patches section of > the manual, above 1800, it should go to core-updates (at the moment). > ``` > > Like that, the command reminds the user/calculates for the user what > branch to put the package in. > > I'm imagining it would be as easy as just getting the length of the output and > matching against it the appropriate message? This would only be useful for people wanting to submit a patch who have forgotten about that rule. For everyone else, this is just technical noise. I don't think this is something terribly useful. In any case, you can create another bug report to suggest it as an UI improvement. Regards, From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 09 17:10:28 2022 Received: (at 53865) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2022 22:10:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53013 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHvAS-0006Sd-2s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 17:10:28 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:35474) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHvAP-0006SG-NU; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 17:10:26 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id e32cb759; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 23:10:18 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20190914; bh=DIABnT8i+g2kJuV0hmBAkqR/zWZSgzIqOC4klPUT+Os=; b=XuG jGioVfObAzVHfQh6pFcPNkW9EF6BPVImik+4apS9rnDC/Zr9G2R5Mf69KOMWpxfW 3QC8AESCHjmRoe42gjlo0FqWxSpJ48Ll7p0lGoEDp8f+RFG/C9el+zOJtdTmoZWy D6oN/WdZKY8PqED6MiXqn14eH9N3D7X3rw5thqRdndu26PP6rsC0IcUht5DeYD1Z FTB0/fgliY1g0PMZyTragVXRPVtxizsyXZ2d9eMXuPeKECJVFwGuF+GJ2r984vOg BrrK3iol/I5ALmg0ddgH7KO3mogansyQqkQpi2KBtxc7gnEUIN69tSCYRbaDTvOe 5zC+liXH3s0PhxI8W3g== Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 7e5f7fdf; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 23:10:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 24439ebf; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 23:10:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id cf747216 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 9 Feb 2022 23:10:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:10:11 -0500 Message-ID: <20220209171011.GB4308@gac.attlocal.net> From: jgart To: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [bug#53865] [PATCH] gnu: ruby-parser: Update to 3.1.0.0. In-Reply-To: <87k0e3vimj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <20220208020834.5701-1-jgart@dismail.de> <874k58w04v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20220209130213.GB5766@gac.attlocal.net> <87o83fvmhn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20220209160530.GB30067@gac.attlocal.net> <20220209161638.GD30067@gac.attlocal.net> <87k0e3vimj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53865 Cc: 53865-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 53865@debbugs.gnu.org, jgart via Guix-patches via X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 22:24:04 +0100 Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > jgart via Guix-patches via writes: > > > What do you think if we were to add a smart user message to the `guix refresh > > --list-dependent ...` command? > > > > I was thinking something along these lines: > > > > ``` > > $ guix refresh --list-dependent ruby-parser > > > > Building the following 1991 packages would ensure 5378 dependent packages are rebuilt: ... > > > > ruby-parser reported 5000+ packages. According to Submitting Patches section of > > the manual, above 1800, it should go to core-updates (at the moment). > > ``` > > > > Like that, the command reminds the user/calculates for the user what > > branch to put the package in. > > > > I'm imagining it would be as easy as just getting the length of the output and > > matching against it the appropriate message? > > This would only be useful for people wanting to submit a patch who have > forgotten about that rule. For everyone else, this is just technical > noise. I don't think this is something terribly useful. > > In any case, you can create another bug report to suggest it as an UI > improvement. If you think it's bloat, I can get behind that. I should just memorize the rule already ;() I was thinking it could be useful for newcomers to Guix but maybe they should just find it in the manual. I know I missed that part in the manual when I was more of a fresher and I still do sometimes as this patch attested. From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:20:27 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator