GNU bug report logs - #53833
[PATCH] gnu: Add qbe.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>

Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 01:21:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Merged with 55150, 55151, 55605

Done: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> ist.tugraz.at>
Cc: 53833 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#53833] [PATCH] gnu: Add qbe.
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 16:10:34 -0500
On Mon, 07 Feb 2022 10:47:08 +0100 Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> ist.tugraz.at> wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 06.02.2022 um 20:13 -0500 schrieb jgart:
> > * gnu/packages/c.scm (qbe): New variable.
> > ---
> >  gnu/packages/c.scm | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/c.scm b/gnu/packages/c.scm
> > index 459d996fa2..8966b7b8d0 100644
> > --- a/gnu/packages/c.scm
> > +++ b/gnu/packages/c.scm
> > @@ -142,6 +142,36 @@ (define-public pcc
> >      ;; preferred.  See http://pcc.ludd.ltu.se/licenses/ for more
> > details.
> >      (license (list license:bsd-2 license:bsd-3))))
> >  
> > +(define-public qbe
> > +  (let ((commit "2ca6fb25a238842418019a3f9ee8d1beb1327f7e")
> > +        (revision "0"))
> > +    (package
> > +      (name "qbe")
> > +      (version (git-version "0.0" revision commit))
> From the homepage: "QBE is in constant change. It is a young project
> and I still have many ideas to try."  As always, I don't think it's too
> good of an idea to package projects that tell you "this edge will make
> you bleed".  Or in the words of the manual
> 
> > Occasionally, we package snapshots of upstream’s version control
> > system (VCS) instead of formal releases.  This should remain
> > exceptional, because it is up to upstream developers to clarify what
> > the stable release is.
> I think upstream is very clear here that QBE is not yet stable and
> therefore not something you'd want in a distro.  Of course, since the
> recipe is a rather simple one, you can easily maintain it in your own
> channel -- or not package it at all and use it from source with just a
> C compiler.

Hi lilyp,

Thanks for the review. It's much appreciated.

Here's a recent talk from FOSDEM 2022 on qbe by Drew Devault in case
you're interested in finding out more about it:

https://fosdem.org/2022/schedule/event/lg_qbe/

I already have qbe in Guix 'R Us along with cproc:

https://git.sr.ht/~whereiseveryone/guixrus/tree/master/item/guixrus/packages/qbe.scm#L43

If maintainers think it will be ready for Guix in the future ping me or
feel free to send an update as you see fit.

all best,

jgart

https://whereiseveryone.srht.site/
gemini://whereiseveryone.srht.site/

https://sr.ht/~mcf/cproc




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 50 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.