Subject: [bug#53820] [PATCH] gnu: Add jtdx

From: Maxime Devos <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2022 16:05:21 +0100

Sheng Yang schreef op zo 06-02-2022 om 08:14 [-0600]:
> +(define jtdx-hamlib
> +  ;; Fork of hamlib with custom patches used by jtdx.

Have these patches been submitted upstream?  If so, can we
add a link to a web page tracking upstreaming progress,
such that we can determine when 'jdtx-hamlib' can be removed
in favour of 'hamlib'?

Given that it is a fork, doesn't the home page, synopsis and
description need to be tweaked?

Why define and not define-public?

Greetings,
Maxime.