GNU bug report logs - #53818
[PATCH 0/3] Add Repology updater

Previous Next

Full log

Message #113 received at 53818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Xinglu Chen <public <at> yoctocell.xyz>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 53818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#53818] [PATCH 0/3] Add Repology updater
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:52:48 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

Ludovic schrieb am Dienstag der 08. Februar 2022 um 23:59 +01:

> Hi!
>
> Xinglu Chen <public <at> yoctocell.xyz> skribis:
>
>> This patchset adds a new updater, which scans Repology[1] for updates.
>> It should technically support all packages in Guix!  :-)
>
> I wouldn’t want to spoil the party, but I’m mildly enthusiastic.
>
> Repology implements the same functionality as our updaters, so
> repology.org is effectively “service as a software substitute”
> (SaaSS).

Right, but it tracks a lot more repositories than what our updaters do,
so why not take advantage of that.

> My preference would be to keep our existing updaters rather than
> effectively ditch them and delegate the work to Repology.  It’s tempting
> to think we can have both, but I’m not sure this would last long.

The point of the Repology updater is to act as a fallback if none of
the other updaters can update a package, e.g., ‘maven-dependency-tree’.
I already mentioned that language-specific updaters usually provide more
accurate and detailed information, so they should be used when possible;
we aren’t losing anything here.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.